Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Malpractice?

Rate this question


john999

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Last time I went to the VA pain clinic they told me that the narcotics they were giving me might kill me because I take clonazepam, but they gave me the narcotics anyway. Is this malpractice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Last time I went to the VA pain clinic they told me that the narcotics they were giving me might kill me because I take clonazepam, but they gave me the narcotics anyway. Is this malpractice?

Informed consent is a phrase often used in the law to indicate that the consent a person gives meets certain minimum standards. As a literal matter, in the absence of fraud, it is redundant. An informed consent can be said to have been given based upon a clear appreciation and understanding of the facts, implications, and future consequences of an action.

In order to give informed consent, the individual concerned must have adequate reasoning faculties and be in possession of all relevant facts at the time consent is given. Impairments to reasoning and judgment which may make it impossible for someone to give informed consent include such factors as basic intellectual or emotional immaturity, high levels of stress such as PTSD or as severe mental retardation, severe mental illness, intoxication, severe sleep deprivation, Alzheimer's disease, or being in a coma. This term was first used in a 1957 medical malpractice case by Paul G. Gebhard http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informed_consent

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

John I promise you they documented it in your records that they have notified you of this and yet you keep calling in for the refills of the narcotics every month just the same as I do great the clonazepam lets us sleep at night but without the percocets our days would be filled with pain and I don't know about you but me without the percs I would be suicidal from the pain I have been on this combination since Sep 2002 and I sure am not complaining I would be in trouble if they cut off either med really between the nightmares and the back pain I can't ignore either issue so I take a reasonable dose of each I don't ever double up on anything and keep the menu if anything I will cut back on the percs if I am having a better than usual day but that means maybe 3 instead of 5 percs I can't remember the last time I had a pain free day I think it was back in 1999 but I couldn't make a bet on that

wasn't you complaining last month because they didn't refill your pain med?

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Last time I went to the VA pain clinic they told me that the narcotics they were giving me might kill me because I take clonazepam, but they gave me the narcotics anyway. Is this malpractice?"

It might be if the the meds are contraindicated and certain combos can cause death.

Has the combo caused you additional disability or any other problems?

Personal example

When I FTCAed the VA one of my charges was that my husband's 4 times day sudafed (maybe it was 6 times a day) forget - prescription was contraindicated by his HBP meds which were at the lowest possible dose yet ,even after having a stroke, nether the low dosage for HBP meds or the high dosage for sudafed was changed by the VA.

This was pre-internet as we know it so I was just guessing on this specific point and offered limited medical side affect info on it at first- and had FOIAed the Feds for some info on deaths and sudafed.

The FOIA request was honored but it took years for the info to arrive and my claim was already resolved by then.

I had found a exam of his sinuses in the med recs.They were clear-no sinus problems at all.

The VACO docs agreed (after many many denials) with all of my FTCA charges but one-(improper treatment of his PTSD)

and stated in their review that the sudafed , for no apparent reason (the X Ray of clear sinuses)had compromised his HBP meds, which were at the wrong dosage anyhow and was instrumnental in contributing to his death.

This was only a small part of my FTCA case but a big part in his demise when one considers he died due to "multiple deviations" from standard VA health Care.( source FTCA medical review and 1151 award.)

If I were you I would aggressively search the meds you take and see, if in fact, they could cause your death by compromising your medical situation.

I dont suppose the docs wrote that down in your meds recs -did they?

You have no idea how angry I have been since I got my recent award for direct SC death and over the new IHD regs.

If only we had the internet when Rod was alive, and had not been impressed by those medical diplomas on the walls of the VA docs offices-

he would be alive today.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I think the VA's solution to my problem will be to cut off the fentanyl because the fentanyl is not in the formulary. A new doctor who did not understand the cheapness of the VA prescribed the fentanyl for the chronic pain. He got fired recently. He was trying to do his job, but ran afoul of the VA's obsession with cost, so they canned him. The other old time VA pain doctors think anti-depressants and neurontin will cure any pain problems. They don't even believe in narcotics. Why are they even running a pain clinic? I don't hurt because I am depressed. I am depressed because I hurt. It is like going to doctors for treatment of PTSD who don't believe it is a problem. My pain is all in my head according to their philosophy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it helps the issue that the TV is filled with commercials that claim that physical pain is a symptom of depression. I did have a VA PCP (phys. asst.) tell me that if I could just get over my emotional problems that my aches and pains would clear up. Yep, that danged depression makes me think I have plantar fasciitis, neuromas, RSD and chondromalacia patella and osteopenia and arthritis and a halux vulgus, etc. etc.. Yep, the x-rays & mri's must be affected by my depression, too.

:wacko:

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have just been prescribed Clonazepam, to help stop thejerking and trembling, shakiness, and take it at bedtime.. it seems very strong but has been immensely helpful in getting rest, but it seems to be very strong and sedates me more than I want.. I just want soemthing ot help keep control of my body when I am going out or resting to keep from having involuntary body movements..

my neurologist says he is getting me a special blood test to test for myotonic dystrophy...

I have myoclonic seizures..

Not in appeals, since I got 100%, and some of it was winning an 1151 negligence, which the VA turns out does not give ful benefits if you win 1151 negligence they squirm and legal loophhole you and your family out of many benefits, really crapp nasty bunch running the va benefits, they wil backstab and scre wyou even if you win you lose. May 2021.

01-01-11_My_Medical_Records2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use