Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Nod Time

Rate this question


cannoncocker

Question

Honestly I do listen and follow the advice here but at the time I had my hands full fighting the multiple back problemwhich I finally beat them down and got it granted. Wrong diagnosis really and low ball rating but full grant so a win none the less.

This is an aside, have you ever seem to hit a wall where everything you send at them, and without time to even read the evenvelope they come back with a denial, to everything regardless. It seems like a synyndrome of some sort. It has been that way since I won through DRO on the back. They really did not want to approve that. Curious if anyone else has come across that scenarrio?

If this sounds good, so I will print of the IRIS dialogue, reprint my nod on th 21-4138 and print a nod on a 21-4138 regarding the denial for time since I made sure it was mailed via verifiable mail and reorded on IRIS. I will copy the receipts return receipts. I neglected that, which of course I shouldn't have but like I said I was full on with my back. Now I have the time I'll give this a run.

At the time it was a long shot but now that I have gone throught teatment and the VA Contract Examination, which I would use to open the claim up if they continue the time denial, was as bad as they get, The VA doctors laughed and wanted to know if they had the right patient. Physical markers on my body were incorrect among other things. Reality is they had the answer and were there to ret4rn with that answer. But it is sufficient to open it back up. since the recorded all those mistakes in the SOC.

I would say multi task but Idid not have the , haha, SOC.at the time.

Thank you guys for this information.

Edited by cannoncocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator

Not really sure what you are talking about. Are you referring to your back claim or other claims that you filed? A little more information would help.

Edited by pacmanx1

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you expect anything different from me? The forum would not seem to allow me to post a reply unlus I added a new topic, which of course split the topics. See NOD Time below but this is much more comprehensive partially due to using ABBYY FineReader 10.

I received the letter bellow that denied the full nod but did allow for a partial nod since they did not grant part of the back claim until April 2010.

Initially the claim in question dealing with anxiety was denied on the 20th but they are claiming the 17th of August 2009. Fine! I submitted the NOD on the 16th of August 2010 by Registered mail with Return Receipt stating the 18th of August. They claim they did not receieve the NOD intil 2 Sep 2010. So they for reasons yet to be understood will allow only the Nod for April 2010. I submitted copies of the mailing numbers at the time in the IRIS Sytem as a back up. See bellow the denial letter:

We are writing in response to the VA Form 21*4138 "'Statement in Support of Claim" you submitted to our office that was received on September 2,2010, This letter will explain what we decided, what you should do if you disagree with our decision* and who to call if you ha ve questions.

What We Decided

We have determined that we cannot accept your letter as a Notice of Disagreement with our decision on your anxiety disorder. The time limit to file a Notice of Disagreement has passed. In order to file an appeal, you mast submit your Notice of Disagreement no later than one year following notification of the adverse decision you are appealing.

In your case, we notified you on August 20, 2009, regarding our Rating Decision dated """ August 17,2009. Therefore, you had one year from August 17,2009 to submit your Notice of Disagreement, Your Notice of Disagreement was not received until September 2f 2010, more than one year from the date you were notified of the Rating Decision.

In regards to your Notice of Disagreement with the effective date of 10% for radicular pain left leg. your Notice of Disagreement was received before we sent out our notification letter of September 15, 2010, We cannot accept a Notice of Disagreement received earlier than our notification letter date.

Please resubmit your Notice of Disagreement and specifically state which rating decision and which issue you are appealing. A review of your claims folder shows that you have had several rating decisions in the past year. For your convenience we have enclosed a copy of all those rating decisions.

SOC: 2. Service connection for anxiety disorder and panic disorder as secondary to the service-connected disabilities of sinus tachycardia, pes planus and plantar fasciitis with status post bunionectomy of both feet, hypertension, tinnitus, and bilateral hearing loss.

Service connection may be granted for a disability which began in military service or was caused by some event or experience in service.

We have received a claim for depression to include panic attacks as secondary to your service connected disabilities (sinus tachycardia, pes planus and plantar fasciitis with status post bunionectomy of both feet, hypertension, tinnitus, and bilateral hearing loss). You also note that your anxiety began in service after an incident in which you state put the lives of seven other men in jeopardy. You note that you were responsible for this near death incident and you subsequently cut your left wrist that evening. You report that you did not seek medical treatment for your left wrist cut, but you still have a deep scar on your left wrist.

Your service treatment records do not show any treatment, complaint, or diagnosis of depression, panic attacks, or any symptom of a mental disability. There is no evidence of a left wrist scar or injury.

Your post service medical evidence shows you were treated for anxiety in August of 2003 at the VAMC in Columbia. You were prescribed Paxil. In December of 2003, you were seen again for anxiety and you decided to stop medication (deciding that a change in jobs may help instead). From September of 2004 to October of 2005, bi annual visits show improvement in your anxiety with no desire for medication. In January of 2008, you reported anxiety and panic attacks for the last two months at the VAMC in Asheville. You underwent a full mental health consultation in March of 2009 and were diagnosed with panic disorder without agoraphobia, depressive disorder not otherwise specified, and generalized anxiety disorder.

VA Contract Examination dated August 4, 2009 shows a diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder without agoraphobia. The examiner reviewed your claims folder and opined that it is not as least as likely as not, that your anxiety/panic attacks are due to your service connected disabilities. The examiner's rationale for the opinion is your denial that your health problems are a significant factor in your anxiety and panic.

The evidence does not show that anxiety disorder and panic disorder is related to the service-connected conditions of sinus tachycardia, pes planus and plantar fasciitis with status post bunionectomy of both feet, hypertension, tinnitus, and bilateral hearing loss, nor is there any evidence of this disability during military service.

I initially was not going to follow through with this claim but once the VA Therapist and I got a load of the SOC from the VA Contract Examiners did not even have my physial markers correct along with their other notes the VA Therapists recommended I follow through which I am now doing.

So is it true that I prove I submitted the NOD on the 16th and by the VAS's own admission allowed until the 17th of August 2010? What action do you suggest I follow from here?

post-5652-096231100 1285705749_thumb.jpg

Edited by cannoncocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well waiting to the last day to do something is not always good and this proofs it. Although you do it seems have evidence that at least something was delivered there on the 18th. I would send them a letter with the form and tell them what you state here that you did send it in on time. Call the 800# and get the fax number to the RO if you do not have it and send it in.

Still not sure if the VA will acknowledge and let your NOD stand but you have a chance it would seem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Cannon

I would do as Stillhere says and fight this out over the NOD date. This is what I think happened: The mailroom got the NOD in time, but the NOD did not get to the RO until September 2. This is not your fault and they are dumb, but never leave it to the last minute again as you can see what happens. They love to dismiss claims for being untimely. It is open and shut. If you are going to cut it close hand deliver it and get date stamped copy. The VA will sit there and say that even when you have a return receipt in your hand that you cannot prove what was in the letter you have the receipt for! They send you rating decison regular mail and then deny you sent them something certified mail when you have proof they got it. My VARO gets 10,000 pieces of mail a day and the chimp they have sorting the mail just can't keep up. Did you claim tinnitus as a cannoncocker?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Still or Mr Hill It is always enouraging when someone will take the time and give some thought to your personal problems. Very considerate and equally appreciated. I hadn't planned on putting it off till the last minute, but who does? I hadn't even planned on following this through, not that I didn't think I was right or had a case but I really thought others were more serserving so Ireally hadn't thought the claim through and the more involved Igot the more facts came to light, then the VA starts with this piling on with the straight lies and disregarding facts etc and so on. In other words it became personal. I am nowready to do whatever it takes, like my back claim. Wasn't easy and was told it would take thousands but in reality it took a freat feal of taliking, researh, ans 324 bucks. If I had just walked away and let them do what they do best which is slap me down I would still be sucking air.

It would seem that actual law would seem to apply here:

1. What exactly constitutes a year to the VA? The Denial according to the VA was 17 August 2009

2. My response was Registered W/return Receipt copied and posted afterwards on the IRIS.

3. As far as "I sent something", they seem to be conceding that it was the NOD related to Anxiety. But now you mention it, how exactly do you prove what you are sending. Aside from posting on IRIS and CC to the DAVwhat do you do to prove you are not sending blank paper?

4.So it boils down to the law. Does the 16th of August 2010 form 17 August 2009 Constitute a VA year? If that is the case I do not know what else a reasonable person could do to prove they responded in a year. It does not seem to be a matter of close or a mile away but rather did I or did I not respond in one legal VA year. Close would not be relevant..

They have given me the right to NOD one item of my claim which by and large is what I need for my claim which is a chance to rebut their(VA) Contract Examination) SOC . That would be sufficient to open up another line of questioning/claim, how wrong there examination was, their intent, so forth, but the other actual parts of the claim that are more felicitous than just secondary results of SC Granted Claims. But Ido not know the full law but I believe oce the claim is open other matters of your service can be considered.

The reason for these questions are I need the answers to determine my next move, ie, nod their denial or go with the opening they left open on the April 2010 Back Grant and use it for the rest ofmy claim.

TheW-S DAV representative Lindsey is doing the duck and cover leaving hadit.com asmy onliest source of information and claim assistence. I don't need a bunch of help but mainly the part that constitutes a VA year?

Edited by cannoncocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cannon

I would do as Stillhere says and fight this out over the NOD date. This is what I think happened: The mailroom got the NOD in time, but the NOD did not get to the RO until September 2. This is not your fault and they are dumb, but never leave it to the last minute again as you can see what happens. They love to dismiss claims for being untimely. It is open and shut. If you are going to cut it close hand deliver it and get date stamped copy. The VA will sit there and say that even when you have a return receipt in your hand that you cannot prove what was in the letter you have the receipt for! They send you rating decison regular mail and then deny you sent them something certified mail when you have proof they got it. My VARO gets 10,000 pieces of mail a day and the chimp they have sorting the mail just can't keep up. Did you claim tinnitus as a cannoncocker?

I guess that makes it pretty much unanimous for Submitting a NOD in the AM with a CC to the DAV for whaatever point there is in that. They are suppose to all me in the am after supposing to call me all day today but it seems like fun. I will look up the exact IRIS, well the first IRIS I submitted the registered mail number and attach it to the NOD with the copy of registered mail w/return receipt copy along with a copy of a request for a copy to the DAV CC but highly unlikely they have it much less heaven forbid file the NOD. John I will break it down like you did and I have enough time to wait them out. I will post the nod tonight on IRIS.

Edited by cannoncocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use