Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

New Presumptives Going Through Now

Rate this question


DuRock

Question

Just called the 800 number to check on status of my Ischemic Heart AO claim, young lady informed me that all of the new presumptive claims were now being processed without further delay. She said that it was now out of Congress and that the VA is presently processing all claims as of yesterday. Can anyone else confirm this information, as far as I am concerned this is great news for everyone concerned.

DuRock

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Both John and I have received emails from NVLSP saying this could be a lengthy process. ( new AO presumptive claims)

I thought I got that statement because I have an unusual AO IHD claim situation.But apparently maybe NVLSP is stating that to any AO vet or widow they hear from.

I dont expect any cash until 2011. Maybe.

With the super dooper IBM system that was supposed to make these claims go faster (and that is snafued already)

I still suggest strongly for anyone filing under these new presumptives to attach to their claim -copies of any evidence they have of diagnosis and in case of IHD- to make sure the VA readily sees evidence of ischemic heart disease by METS test results, and/or ECHO as to the ejection fraction.

Rick at NVLSP (an AO expert) told me they would still have to send out VCAA letters on these new claims.That will take tme and then their is the response period added to it.

I feel the VCAA could be waived if the vet or widow sends them apply evidence right from the git go but he said that would never happen because they cant deny us our VCAA rights.

(yeah right) I never got my VCAA rights for my last claim and the BVA recognized that error-but I had the only thing that mattered-the medical evidence.

I wold actually love to get a real VCAA letter this time.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It indeed will be interesting to see what kind of SNAFU the DAV can come up with to delay claims payments? Still, to rate and award to Vet's who have completed the claims process should be a simple matter?

Personally, as noted in a post I made to this forum several months ago regarding my "C" file, I just this week finally received the copy of my file. The good side of the delay in getting the copy of my file is that it now includes my IHD Claim and I received a copy of the C&P Exam that I underwent in July. The C&P report, which states that it is "Final" in it's conclusion finds that I am diagnosed with IHD and that my LV Dysfunction equates to an ejection fraction of less than 30%. I assume that based upon this report rating my claim under the current guidelines should be a no-brainer? How long could it possibly take to have the computer cut an award letter and begin payments? I guess we will see?

Jim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A poster on another board has posted that he has received an award letter and it was favorable which also had a payment start date of Nov.1, 2010

Trying to get this clarified now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

stillhere: Can you also post the State and City the VARO is in??

Likewise,,, if anyone else has posts as to the effective A/O payout date, a City/State for that VARO would be helpful too.

thanks

tom

A poster on another board has posted that he has received an award letter and it was favorable which also had a payment start date of Nov.1, 2010

Trying to get this clarified now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rick at NVLSP (an AO expert) told me they would still have to send out VCAA letters on these new claims.That will take tme and then their is the response period added to it.

I feel the VCAA could be waived if the vet or widow sends them apply evidence right from the git go but he said that would never happen because they cant deny us our VCAA rights.

(yeah right) I never got my VCAA rights for my last claim and the BVA recognized that error-but I had the only thing that mattered-the medical evidence.

I wold actually love to get a real VCAA letter this time.

Berta,

Like you, I deal with the Buffalo VARO, and I received the VCAA notice for my presumptive IHD claim on 9/1/2010. I had the C&P exam on 9/21 at the Syracuse VAMC. I guess they are at least working on these claims. That might be good news.

Edited by JustPLS

Pat

I wonder if I would have all the medical conditions that I have now if I had never joined the Army. I'm pretty sure the answer would probably be no. When I look around and see others my age who were not in the service, most of them look pretty healthy.

Do you think all the employees of the VA really understand that it is ONLY because we served that their positions even exist?

'67-'68 1st Cav, '69-'70 101st Abn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you are already SC'ed for arteriosclerotic heart disease is it possible to get SC'ed for IHD as well? Would the VA just combine these disabilites under one or the other DX? Are these two diseases differenct or the same thing with another name like CAD? Would the VA be likely to call us in for C&P exams for the IHD claims?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use