Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

More Bradley Vs Peake

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Here is the gist of what I am getting at in this post:

Frankly, I think many/if not most recent 100% Schedular Vets are also unemployable, and should be entilted to about another $311 per (SMC S) month under Bradley vs Peake. But they are going to have to file a CUE.

I have just about made up my mind that it is CUE for the VA to tell the Vet that TDIU is moot, when it is not.

I am fairly sure I will file, and have a message into a law firm.

Other Vets can do what they like, but I am not leaving any money on the table to which I am (or even may be) entitled.

My 100% scheduler was awarded in Jan. '99 so it's not recent. I hope you are right and win.

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Here is the gist of what I am getting at in this post:

Frankly, I think many/if not most recent 100% Schedular Vets are also unemployable, and should be entilted to about another $311 per (SMC S) month under Bradley vs Peake. But they are going to have to file a CUE.

I have just about made up my mind that it is CUE for the VA to tell the Vet that TDIU is moot, when it is not.

I am fairly sure I will file, and have a message into a law firm.

Other Vets can do what they like, but I am not leaving any money on the table to which I am (or even may be) entitled.

bronco,

Go get em !

Tell them, "Show me the money".

I hope you can do it at COVA and make it a precedent setting case : )

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Dsgsr

If I am right on this (and I dont know if I am or not), then it could be a lot for a lot of Veterans. There is even some chance if it applies to a lot of Veterans, then many of them could basically get a $311 per month "raise" for SMC S (Housebound).

When I asked a similar question on another board, a retired rater with some 20 years experience chimed in with his opinion. He did not say, "Yes, you are entitled to SMC Housbound under Bradley if you file a CUE", but he also did not expressly say no, either. He did say something about a "loophole" suggesting that is was not the intent of the law to award SMC S Housebound to IU-Schedular Vets.

This retired rater related a story about a different "benefits loophole" as follows: (This is my paraphrasing of the story)

There was a loophole in the law, which basically stated that before a Veteran could receive compensation as a result of VA medical care, there had to be proof of negligence or malpractice. Then, apparently a Veteran took the VA to court over this, and the court ruled that the VA had no authority to deny claims simply based on the absence of malpractice or negligence. After the court ruling congress stepped in and "fixed" the legislation, however during the interim period before congress could act, the Va had "no choice but to grant a bunch of claims that otherwise should not have been granted". Apparently a number of Veterans took advantage of the "window of opportunity" before the loophole was closed.

At this point, I dont know if its a "loophole" or a "noose" to hang me with. I think I will be watching for anyone in the VA who looks like they are trying to "kick the chair out from under me". However, I think if the VA "had the goods" on me, I would already be swinging from the bottom of that noose, because I am pretty sure there are enough VA employees that would really like to see me choke to death, that, if they could, they would already have done it. I just dont think they can "hang me out to dry" with this large of an audience.

I feel compelled to proceed, at some risk of retaliation by the VA, for the benefit of other Vets as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Bronco

File it. You have nothing to lose. Whether it is a CUE or not you will probably get an answer in a hurry. I got my CUE in about 5 weeks on the IU plus 60% "S". That is speed of light for St. Petersburg VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Ok...Will someone please give the "hampster wheel" a spin after I jump on? On second thought, I dont know if I can take another 10 years on the VA benefit hampster wheel.

I was hoping to find someone who had figured out how to get off the hampster wheel, other than the "usual" method of getting off the VA hampster wheel by giving up on your benefits. That is the only sure way to get off the wheel that I know of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use