Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Congressional Inquiry

Rate this question


unique

Question

My appeal is currently at the SSA Appeals Council level. I was denied SSA disability benefits by the ALJ. Has anyone ever had to write their Congressman concerning a social security disability issue and did it help?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Has your lawyer sent you to one of his doctors to get more evidence? Most SSD lawyers know doctors who know how to write good reports for the SSD judge. I really don't think congress critters will help at all. It might even slow it down as they pause to respond to you. The congressman will make an inquiry and the SSD will send back some BS and your congressman will accept it. That's it! What does your lawyer say to do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has your lawyer sent you to one of his doctors to get more evidence? Most SSD lawyers know doctors who know how to write good reports for the SSD judge. I really don't think congress critters will help at all. It might even slow it down as they pause to respond to you. The congressman will make an inquiry and the SSD will send back some BS and your congressman will accept it. That's it! What does your lawyer say to do?

Yes my lawyer did send me to one of his doctors and he said that I cannot work but I was still denied at the ALJ hearing. My lawyer said that I can write my Congressmanl if I wanted to it is my decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes my lawyer did send me to one of his doctors and he said that I cannot work but I was still denied at the ALJ hearing.

unique,

What reason did the ALJ give to deny ?

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

unique,

At the Social Security Appeal Council level, your case is first received and prepared for review. It then goes on a pile of other cases to be reviewed, to see if it will even be reviewed in case of an ALJ error; or just a standard appeal denied letter is sent. (Roughly 75% of cases are denied, 22% remanded back to the ALJ for corrections, and 3% get a favorable ruling).

For 2009, the average processing time for Appeals Council cases was 261 days. However, due to increases in applications and subsequent denials, the average processing time for 2010 was 345 days, and is getting longer.

I am in the same boat, as I too have my case sitting at the Social Security Appeals Council. I have evidence that the ALJ ignored evidence of multiple hospitalizations in my file. However, in my opinion, a Congressional inquiry will probably only slow my case down; which in all likelihood is going to result in the standard denial letter anyways. I can't imagine a Congressional inquiry speeding anything up, as everyone would do it if it worked; and I haven't seen it posted as working on any of the Social Security boards I've visited. I could be wrong...

I am prepared to do two things, if I am denied by the Social Security Appeals Council:

1. File suit against the Social Security Administration in Federal District Court.

2. File a complaint against the Administrative Law Judge for being biased against me, based upon his deliberately ignore supportive evidence in my file.

I have called the 800 # and ensured that my request for appeal was received. I was added to the cases waiting to be reviewed in late August 2010 - so have been waiting 121 days, but who's counting?

Edited by Bonzai

"It is a terrible thing, when you lose your train of thought and you only have a one track mind"... Me

96C2P/96F2P (old MOS designations)

97E2P/37F2P (new MOS designations)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use