Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Misuse Of Words On C&p, Will This Hurt My Case?

Rate this question


combatcamera

Question

I had a C&P exam related to sexual trauma and I said to the therapist, I think he was going to try and rape me and she put that I said he tried to rape me. Then for my combat experience, she wrote down the location wrong. Both of these things conflict with my statements. Will this hurt my case?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

The C&P exam results include a section where the doc opines whether or not it is service connected. What did they say? The answer should include something like "Is due to; more likely; least as likely; less than likely; is not due to"

Additionally, the VA will verify the stressor. Did you send in a stressor letter and other evidence? Do you know if the VA confirmed the stressor?

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The C&P exam results include a section where the doc opines whether or not it is service connected. What did they say? The answer should include something like "Is due to; more likely; least as likely; less than likely; is not due to"

Additionally, the VA will verify the stressor. Did you send in a stressor letter and other evidence? Do you know if the VA confirmed the stressor?

I requested and submitted the evidence from the case opened by CID regarding this matter and the combat incident is of course already confirmed due to the documentation kept nowadays, but yes I did send the stressor letter with my own evidence as well. and yes it was confirmed that it is service connected. The point is though, what the therapist wrote is not what I said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I would wait for the rating. If it is not what you think it should be then you can raise these issues on appeal. It really depends on what the doctor concludes about your stressors and if you MST/PTSD is service connected. If the VA accepts your stressors then I don't see a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cc- my medical records and C&P's have no small number of errors, omissions and downright fabrications, but I got mine.

If you see glaring discrepancies on your copy of the C&P that you think may be detrimental to your case, I'd submit corrections to the VA.

Many details that look huge to us are completely overlooked by the raters, so hang in there and we'll hope for the best. :smile:

Edited by Notorious Kelly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

cc- my medical records and C&P's have no small number of errors, omissions and downright fabrications, but I got mine.

If you see glaring discrepancies on your copy of the C&P that you think may be detrimental to your case, I'd submit corrections to the VA.

Many details that look huge to us are completely overlooked by the raters, so hang in there and we'll hope for the best. :smile:

Thank you and I hope you're right. What kind of errors are there if you don't mind me asking?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use