Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question On Attorneys

Rate this question


jeff10

Question

Just wondered if many people get frustrated enough with VSO's and head to an attorney who practices V.A.law. Or..maybe that is what I should be doing. VSO filed for 100% IU in Feb.2010. I recv'd 70% in fall of 2010. VSO has sent me to my V.A. doc twice since then to get him to call VSO and give opposing opinion to CP examiner. My doc has said sure both times and called my VSO to ask what he needs exactly. VSO has ALWAYS been busy and says he will return docs call..but can never get a handle on how to hook up with him!! My VSO told me he's going to wait till Aug.2011 to appeal or disagree or whatever it is he does,because that's 12 months from Decision. Does this sound a little dicey on his part? Any advice from anyone on forum who has taken the step to use an attorney,? downsides?

jeff10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

You need a written statement from your doctor saying your SC conditions is the sole cause of your being unemployable. Phone calls don't cut it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ditto on John999's post and I believe I posted that to you in another thread.

Also, I'm not sure you're open to hire an attorney at this point.

Other's will chime in.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a perfect world, the VA would infer a claim for TDIU if the evidence of record suggests evidence of unemployable, i.e. a medical opinion relating the conditions which are SC'd as being so severe that they render the claimant unemployable. If not they are in error. (See Fenderson v. West (1999), and Rice v. Shinseki (2009))

The VA will in most cases re-evaluate all conditions, even if recently evaluated if a claim for TDIU is now claimed without a current medical opinion and properly filed VA form 21-8940 of record. Did your VSO ask you to start working on the VAF 21-8940 and additionally advise you to obtain 4192's from your prior employers to expedite the claim?

You may want to clarify the intentions of your representative, and if needed seek a second opinion before consulting an attorney. If the VSO is developing your claim, and is working diligently, then try to appreciate the tremendous workload these men and women bear. I have often seen cases where the veteran appointed an attorney after the VSO did the majority of the work in reviewing the claim and often arguing for the 70% evaluation, and was working to develop the claim for TDIU. I think a good VSO, should always tell their clients what we are doing and what the end goal is. You don't have to understand the law involved to appreciate the strategy.

This is best I can tell you without more precise info. This is giving your rep the benefit of the doubt that he or she knows what they are doing and why. There is internal guidance in VA Training Letter 10-07 which states:

"VA examinations are generally undertaken in conjunction with original disability

compensation claims and claims for increase in accordance with VA’s statutory duty to

assist a Veteran in developing his/her claim. See 38 U.S.C. § 5103A(d); 38 C.F.R. §

3.159©(4).

In such claims, if a request for a TDIU evaluation is expressly raised by the

Veteran or reasonably raised by the evidence of record, a general medical examination is to

be scheduled. Specialty examinations (Eye, Audio, Mental, Traumatic Brain Injury, and

Dental) may also need to be scheduled. These specialty examinations are only to be

ordered when the Veteran is service connected for an eye, audio, mental, or dental

condition that is not already at the schedular maximum, even if this condition is not one

that the Veteran is claiming as causing his or her unemployability. Additionally, the

examiner should be requested to provide an opinion as to whether or not the Veteran’s

service-connected disability(ies) render him or her unable to secure and maintain

substantially gainful employment, to include describing the disabilities’ functional

impairment and how that impairment impacts on physical and sedentary employment."

If no medical opinion is of record, a solid one may be needed addressing the SC'd conditions to ensure the Rating Board is provided with more than one assessment as to "unemployability". The Gen Med examination will not exclude those disabilities found which are not service connected, and this in-and-of itself presents a potential problem to a favorable outcome. As far as the phone calls, I know most full-time, working (emphasis added) VSO's carry a high demand. I stress to my counterparts how, no matter how many man-hours you spend on a case, not returning phone calls will kill any faith, trust, or gratitude your client may have had in you and/or the Organization.

In the end you need to evaluate the communication and relationship you have with your advocate, and whether or not your needs are being met, and if they can be met, however, if I understand properly, he was trying to do the right thing.

Hope this helps.

Ne Desit Virtus-Let Valor Not Fail

"These fallen we verify, these fallen we venerate, until at last we form again".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

in order to legally get a lawyer involved in a VA claim you have to have a written denial of a claimed benefit, I don't see that noted in this discussion, the VA is not like Social Security where you can hire a lawyer at any point in the claims process you want to even for the initial claim the VA doesn't allow that they require a denial of a claim at the Regional office level now this law was changed in June 2007 before this veterans were not allowed to have lawyers involved until the claims were denied by the BVA and were then being appealed to the Court of Veteran Appeals

you don't have to like the VA rules but you do have to play by them

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carlie, I think you did say I needed something written (can't find the post on forum). But the VSO said he wants to talk to the doc to tell him what needs to be specified. I also asked VSO about attor. today. He said I could if I wished because there is no appeal filed at this time.He said VA does frown on it though and could stretch the time out. What is it you think could prevent me from going that route at this time. I hate to make the move and find out they put it on a back burner. To answer rakkwarrior,VSO never had me fill out anyVF21-8940. As far as last employer goes they contacted them already.

jeff10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use