Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question Of Date Of Receipt

Rate this question


deltaj

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Do V.A. hospitals keep copies of the claims they mail to VARO? I am helping a veteran who 22 years ago on the last day of his hospitalization for a non service connected disability made a claim requesting reevaluation of his service connected disability. His recollection is that he gave the claim to somebody at the V.A. Hospital. The claim was then sent to VARO who supposedly received it 2 days later, one year and one day after the effective date of permanent and total disability determined by Social Security Disability from his service connected condition. Notice that 38 CFR 3.1 ® has in the past stated that date of receipt is the date evidence was received by the Veterans Administration. V.A. has refused to grant the effective date as of the date of the date the claim was written in the hospital and V.A. has stated in writing that granted that as the date of receipt wouldn't make a difference. The issue should be entitlement to that effective date under 38 CFR 3.400 (o) (2).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Lead Moderator

I dont think the VAMC does, but he probably did not apply through the VAMC, but rather through a VSO at the VAMC. There is a chance that a record of this is at his VSO at the VAMC.

If there is no record at the VSO, then it is likely his evidence was mishandled, as so many Veterans have been vicitims of this. I am fighting mishandled (shredded), in regards to the effecitive date. Read fast letter 08-41, scroll down to the bottom of the page.

http://www.vawatchdog.org/08/nf08/nfnov08/nf111908-3.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Remember, The VBA and the VHA do not know what the other one does, at least when we WANT them to know. If we dont want the other one to know, then they communicate beautifully, for example, in proposals to reduce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

Have you considered telling the vet to request a copy of his C-File? The Document may very well be in the claim folders, VA is notorious for not reviewing the entire C-File and this may solve the issue. Also have the veteran request his VAMC records both computerized and hand written notes, and of course as bronco suggest if he has a POA, have him check those records as well.

Edited by pacmanx1

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Do V.A. hospitals keep copies of the claims they mail to VARO? I am helping a veteran who 22 years ago on the last day of his hospitalization for a non service connected disability made a claim requesting reevaluation of his service connected disability. His recollection is that he gave the claim to somebody at the V.A. Hospital. The claim was then sent to VARO who supposedly received it 2 days later, one year and one day after the effective date of permanent and total disability determined by Social Security Disability from his service connected condition. Notice that 38 CFR 3.1 ® has in the past stated that date of receipt is the date evidence was received by the Veterans Administration. V.A. has refused to grant the effective date as of the date of the date the claim was written in the hospital and V.A. has stated in writing that granted that as the date of receipt wouldn't make a difference. The issue should be entitlement to that effective date under 38 CFR 3.400 (o) (2).

Delta. Look at the regs for informal claims. You may have this avenue to consider for this Veteran. He shiuld also request a complete copy of his claims folder and analyze each and every diocument. I suggest he allow you to assist him or her in doing that.

You would be amazed at what you fine hidden inside these big folders.

Basser.

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"V.A. has refused to grant the effective date as of the date of the date the claim was written in the hospital and V.A. has stated in writing that granted that as the date of receipt wouldn't make a difference."

They probably mean the evidence they had at that time did not warrant SC anyhow.

I had neighbor with similiar situation.

He spent hours here telling me the whole nine yards about his Navy experience regarding what seemed to be a clear cut basis for a SC claim that he said he filed with someone at a VAMC , decades ago,in another state.

But he spent more time here that day then he spent in 2 decades trying to find out any status of his claim.He was then unwilling to follow any suggestion I had which was mainly to get over to the state Vet rep at the local VAMC where he was getting his VA health care 20 minutes away-to find out if a claim had ever been filed with VA at all and if not to get on started.

Your vet's C file -as others said -might well reveal the claim he filed but for some reason the VA stated "it wouldn't make a difference".They had to have some legit reason to say that.

Have you seen this veteran's DD 214?

As the BVA has said in decisions from time to time ,the VA claims process is not a one way street.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use