Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Another Vet Sues Va

Rate this question


Berta

Question

"Rivera’s suit is one of 45 filed against the VA so far in Miami, with 113 more in line to sue after filing the notice required when a government agency is involved.

There could be many more suits to come. Rivera was among 11,000 veterans who had colonoscopies performed in Miami, Tennessee and Georgia between 2004 and 2009 with equipment that the VA has acknowledged may have been improperly cleaned. The VA says 2,539 Miami vets are “potentially at risk for infection” from the colonoscopies but insists that “there is currently no evidence to suggest these infections were acquired from the endoscopic equipment.”

So far, five Miami-area vets who had colonoscopies at the VA during the five years have tested positive for HIV, eight for hepatitis C and one for hepatitis B."

Read more: http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/02/26/2087611/miami-vets-sue-the-va-over-flawed.html#ixzz1FC4D0b6P

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • Lead Moderator

Berta

Thank you for posting this. In a similar way, I was a patient at Dayton VAMC ( Dental) and I am among the 535 (that is a minimum number, as I will point out) Veterans who may have gotten infected from an elderly dentist that kept working on patients in spite of him being 82 years old and having dementia.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/02/26/dayton-vamc-dentist-under-investigation-named/

The VA is contacting ONLY patients seen by this doctor, however, it would seem to me if this doc has poor infection control practices, he could contaminate equipment used by other dentists for other patients also. For that reason, I do not think the infection possibility is limited to 535 patients, but could be numbered in the thousands.

Of course, I dont have a way of "proving" this, and it is only a theory...but if he (potentially) contaminated PATIENTS, then it follows he also probably contaminated EQUIPMENT that other dentists may have used on other patients. In other words, he could have easily put dirty equipment where clean equipment is stored, to be used by the next dentist.

I have not been tested yet...I am kind of afraid to find out. JMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I have been seeing a Fee Service Dentist and close to finishing 7,000 that the VA is paying her. She washes her hands every time she comes into the room. So does her assistant.

When I went to VA Dentist I never saw them wash hands but at least they wore gloves.

I would say that I see more men wash their hands after going to bathroom in a public toilet than I see at the VA. Some are good and many are not so good.

I refuse to shake hands with a lot of the people including my shrink who I have never seen make any attempt at hygiene

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

This is pretty awful, but I got a bad staff infection from a private doctor. The best place to get a life threatening infection is a hospital. If not for a month of IV anti-biotics I would have lost my foot. I have lost trust in all doctors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

John:

You are right but if as short cut or a cheap way to treat a Vet look for the VA to lead the way. Its a lot better than it used to be.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Pete

Oh, yeah, I agree with that. The VA are the major cheapskates. I even fear getting shots or having them draw blood. I really think profit motive drives private medical services and cheapness drives the VA. Patient welfare is done on the list around the bottom. Marcus Welby, Dr. Ben Casey and Dr. Kildare have been dead a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use