Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question On My Claim

Rate this question


Berta

Question

VA just confirmed whereabouts and status of my claim via 800.

It again appears that the CUE claim must be resolved before the formal IHD claim.The man said the PC indicated that both claims can "go forward" on March 7th. ????

I said what couldn't they 'go forward' prior to that but he couldn't tell why from the PC. ???

The CUE claim was filed in July 2004.

This is my question-under the CUE the VA failed to give any diagnostic code or rating whatsoever for my husband's documented IHD.

Although it was granted under FTCA and Sec 1151 as well as his totally disabling FTCA and 1151 CVA, the CVA was given DC and rating but it was all wrong.

VA refused to award SMC and they were wrong there too.Thus the CUE.

Consequently these all became direct SC AO disablities last year by BVA award.

The CVA is easy to rate. 100% direct SC (I forget what the right DC should be.)

The IHD has to be rated at a staged rating for 4 years -1988 heart attack and then IHD to 1992 as then in 1992 an ECHO reveals a 60% IHD rating was warranted.

The veteran died 2 years after the ECHO with IHD as cause of death and CVA contributing.

I have asked VA to award 100% for the 2 years coming after the ECHO.

The 60% ECHO results didn't happen overnight so that could involve up to 60% staged ratings prior to the ECHO.

The VA as you all know admitted to malpractice on all of above now SC disabilities -so that isnt the issue.

Although VA was aware of my husband's heart disease for 6 years they did nothing to diagnose and treat it and hid it in the med recs but I found it.(FTCA/Sec 1151 award)

Question -so since VA has no evidence whatsoever medically to say Rod's heart disease was not at 100% level for most of the time after the 1992 ECHO to his death due to their proven failure to treat it, do you think would they have the nerve to say it was only at 60$ SC up to day of his death?

Has anyone here ever had situation like that?

My claim is under Nehmer -has VA ever told anyone here that-as of a certain date- their claim will 'go forward'?

The 800 rep said there is no indication of any letters to me at all regarding this claim under Nehmer from the VAMC-True.

I have 2 Irises confirming it is Nehmer accrued.He said they must have all they need to "go forward".whatever that means.

:blink:

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

Berta said:

Right-VCAA violations are not part of any CUE claim.One does not receive a VCAA letter for a CUE claim.

The medical evidence must be documented and established.

You can only support a CUE claim with legal evidence.

I will keep my claims issues to myself from now on.

Well I certainly hope it was not post that set you off. But you did ask for opinions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all.

If they award 60% IHD I am prepared to fight that with the autopsy and the OGC medical reports.

Berta,

Of course at this point there is no way to know anything - for sure.

BUT

I do think they will try to slide by with a 60 percent grant, like throwing out

a bone, just to make us have to keep fighting them for accurate adjudication.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will keep my claims issues to myself from now on.

And I am documenting exactly how the VA treats widows of veterans- for future testimony I intend to give the H VAC.

"I am holding the VA accountable for their own regulations" that is worth repeating.

If you have sound medical evidence and a nexus and are still being denied-

the regulations that govern your claim are probably being violated by VA.

I have had responses from VA that are absurd and based on no established VA case law

whatsoever -as some of these raters are making it up as they go.

Berta,

I agree with all of the above Except,

"I will keep my claims issues to myself from now on."

Hey - remember - this is how we can keep learning how to fight

the good fight - and win !

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh I meant Carlie-

I will post when I succeed in these claims.

There is a lot to them-especially the IHD claim with PAD and CVA secondary.

All the now SCed issues were also prior 1151 issues in the 1151 award.

I feel sorry for the rater in Phila. who has to decide my claims.

Although the IHD claim could render my CUE as a moot issue I am sure hoping I get something from VA that makes sense regarding why it isn't a CUE.

They have yet to acknowledge my legal evidence. Even the DRO ignored it all.I wish they had sent it to the BVA, but they put it under Nehmer at the last minute.

The results of both claims I have pending should be the same anyhow with the same EED.

I thought I sensed some negativity here a few times when I mentioned my claims.Maybe just my VA induced paranoia kicking in. Ha Ha

And the fact my former vet reps and even lawyers told me I would never succeed on every other issue I had since 1995 (which now I have award letters for :wink: )

I want a CUE decision based on VA case law, not some rater's ridiculous remarks. They haven't provided me a denial based on VA established SMC regs since I filed the CUE claims in 2004.

Even when the R0 had to prepare my direct SC death award letter, they stated things that had no basis in fact and the letter granting the award was absolutely absurd.The very first statement was not based on any VA case law whatsoever.

If I had been a widow with no knowledge of the regs- the very first statement would have prevented me from attaining any ancillary benefits.

I Nodded it-the award was correct, but the rest of it is evidence for the H VAC of how some of us deal with incompetent raters and DROs , in some cases, whose comprehension of VA 101 is nil.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use