Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Need Help!

Rate this question


jessie0054

Question

Need help on what to do to stop the Va from cutting my son's benefits

He is receiving benefits for service connected Polycythemia Vera. Currently at 40% for having to have monthly blood draws and phelbotomies. The Va said that since his blood levels have been in the normal range for the past 4 months ne no longer has PV. How can they determine this as there is no cure for Polycythemia Vera. One you have it you have it for life. Do they not understand the disease?? It go's in to a remission state with repeated phelboties to get the level back to a normal levels and can stay in remissions for as long as treatment continues. Without the treatment the symptoms will come back along with the risk.

What can we do?

Thanks Jessie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Fight it I am a Navy Veteran and I TOO have PV. I have to do the same thing your son has to do. I just had a biopsy of the bone marrow to see how many premature blood cells I have. Can you tell me how your son got approval for his 40 percent. I served between 1972 and 1974 and was a radioman on a ship that used JP5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Don't get to excited you need to appeal but if it was me I would start talking to some Doctors. Good Luck. I wish I knew more about this condition but I will pray for you and your son.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he is still requiring phlebotomy it should remain at 40%.

7704 Polycythemia vera:

During periods of treatment with

myelosuppressants and for three months

following cessation of myelosuppressant

therapy ..................................................... 100

Requiring phlebotomy ................................. 40

Stable, with or without continuous medication

........................................................... 10

NOTE: Rate complications such as hypertension, gout, stroke

or thrombotic disease separately.

"Don't give up. Don't ever give up." Jimmy V

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

There are very specific things the VA has to do on reductions. How long has your son been SC for this? That is what is his effective date?

There are rules which protect Veterans ratings at 5years and 20 years.

If no one else chimes in, I will try to look up Katrina Eagles excellent article on VA reductions. (She is a well known lawyer representing Veterans). She has some great advice. I think it will help you. While Katrina Eagles advice has been removed from the internet when she changed law firms, I think I posted it here on hadit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

I think the link still works to Eagles article on reductions. Try here checking "broncovet" posts.

You are unlikely to get better advice on Veterans benefits that Katrina Eagle...I think she is or was the president of

NVLSP or NOVA...one of those Veterans attorney organizations, I cant remember which.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Or try this link:

http://jimstrickland...Reductions.html

Yes, I agree with Sharon, but it sounds like your son may have to prove it.

Hopefully, if the VA reduction is unfounded, the VA will drop it. Be sure to respond to their "sixty day" letter proposal to reduce. Katrina recommends asking for a hearing, if I recall.

This gives you more time..and delays in reductions are good!

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use