Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Now We Wait!

Rate this question


Chuck75

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

The other day, the VA sent an insurance brochure and application form. Reading the details, if a veteran is over 65, the amount drops to $500 from a minimum of $10k.

Since I fall into the over 65 category, and have a significant currently not service connected condition, I was scratching my head as to why the VA even bothered.

Thinking back, past copies were sent to me when a service connection decision was made.

Then it slowly dawned on me that some event might have driven the "automatic issue" of the letter.

After considering the hassle, etc involved in using the 800 number, I decided curiosity was getting the better of me, and called.

The effort, naturally, involved the usual we're to busy to answer, call again at a later time, etc. replies, and required multiple tries (4) to finally get to speak to a real person.

I found out that a "Nehmer" award had been made, and "I should be quite pleased". The VAMC supposedly sent a letter out dated late last week. Unknowns are when the letter was actually mailed, and how long it takes

the letter to travel about 100 pigeon miles by "Snail Mail". The "Nehmer" claim involves a 100% condition and several years retro, as well as 20% of retro to the lawyer.

Things that may be left to fight about - - "staged ratings", secondary issues, effective dates, etc. The VA was blatantly not compliant with the Nehmer court order, and what happens as a result of that is still unknown.

The equal access to justice act bit, due to the current budgetary squabbles, is also up in the air. If eventually paid, this may eventually result in a refund to me. Unfortunately, this is just one part of several claims, that were denied.

Other claims still need to go through the appeals process, so "it's not over" yet!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Chuck75

Sometimes I think it is never over with the VA.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WOW Chuck-that is extraordinary info to get from the 800#.

They usually don't reveal much about an award.

Did you formally re file this to get it under Nehmer?

I guess I mean is a new AO presumptive claim?

Or did they perhaps pull a past denied claim you had, never letting you know, and then they awarded under the new AOs?

This is odd.The VA pulled one of my claims for Nehmer without informing me in August right after the new regs came out.

But I didn't know this and filed a new AO IHD claim the same month.

I have had only one formal Nehmer letter so I don't really know what they are working on.

The 800 guy told me my CUE as well as the Aug 2010 formal claim is what they are working on.

This sounds like very good news from the VA- then again I never believed anything until I had the cash in the bank.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The original claim was filed (and approved) for presumptive DMII. The VA failed to do several things.

1. The VA entrance exam (several years ago) was fairly decent, except that the Examiner failed to check a box relating to A.O. Vietnam, etc.

2. Due to a peculiarity in the Veteran group assignments, the DMII approved claim placed me in group 2.

3. The VA failed to notify the Nehmer class action lawyers.

4. My VA and service records show evidence of IHD, and other records as well. They had denied a previous claim. The claim was refiled between the time the decision was announced, and before it was effective.

5. Within the last month, my lawyer wrote a letter to the VARO, reminding them of certain time limits in the court order, of which the shortest was 21 days.

The VAMC, VARO, and the VA clinic failed to correct things for several years. (Veterans don't know anything, don't-cha know!) Some months ago, I ended up contacting the Nehmer class lawyers,

and they sent a request to the VA for records. That sort of triggered several things. A C&P (last year) also had Nehmer related statements from the examiner. I also requested an "insurance audit" from the VAMC.

Since I currently have only one Nehmer claim up for decision, I was able to give the phone rep enough info that she could say a little bit more than usual, without

getting into trouble. Also, being nice and polite sometimes works wonders. The claim was recently transferred from my "normal" VARO to BayPines for decision, etc. as a Nehmer claim.

I can't say more-- Other than, like you, to me, cash in hand is the real determination.

WOW Chuck-that is extraordinary info to get from the 800#.

They usually don't reveal much about an award.

Did you formally re file this to get it under Nehmer?

I guess I mean is a new AO presumptive claim?

Or did they perhaps pull a past denied claim you had, never letting you know, and then they awarded under the new AOs?

This is odd.The VA pulled one of my claims for Nehmer without informing me in August right after the new regs came out.

But I didn't know this and filed a new AO IHD claim the same month.

I have had only one formal Nehmer letter so I don't really know what they are working on.

The 800 guy told me my CUE as well as the Aug 2010 formal claim is what they are working on.

This sounds like very good news from the VA- then again I never believed anything until I had the cash in the bank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CHuck-I have followed Nehmer since around 1990.And NVLSP.

In the late 1990s the ROs made multiple errors in adjudicating claims under Nehmer.

When NVLSP found out,they went into the ROs and ended up getting VA to release millions of improperly withheld retro money.

By Fall 2001 NVLSP had recovered about 8 million dollars in retro that VA had,up to that point, successfully withheld from vets and widows by their deliberate failure to properly follow the Nehmer court order.

Also VA had somehow eliminated the retro provisions of Nehmer in the Federal Register when Nehmer was won, and in this way they kept thousands of potential Nehmer vets and widows and vet reps in the dark.

I have been involved with VA long enough to state here that nothing happens in a vacuum.

Decisions are made by someone to others in ROs to deliberately sit on or continuously deny claims which have probative evidence in the C file.

In the case of Nehmer claims-they denied a court order in the past and this is why the part about sanctions has been written into the NVLSP Training Letter.

You sure did the right thing by contacting NVLSP.

I often wonder about DMII vets who also claimed heart disease from the DMII and were denied and now they have chance for potential proper award under the new IHD regs.

If VA didnt pull their older denial and if they have not contacted NVLSP themselves- how will they ever find out they could succeed under the new regs if they dont access web site like hadit or google AO and get some updated info on IHD?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest terrysturgis

Chuck75, reading between the lines, I think you did good. We'll have to wait and see but it looks like your journey is about over. Good luck. Terry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use