Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Ceases Benefits For Veteran Suffering Ailments Linked To Agent Orange

Rate this question


carlie

Question

  • Answers 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

More to this then meets the eye-

much much more------ yes it sure looks like the veteran never filed a timely NOD-as he probably thought it would not matter if he did.

I have spoken to Sam Hall------who repped Mr. Cooley.

This is worse then I thought and

this might get MUCH bigger than I thought yesterday-----

full story will be at VAWatchdogToday as it develops.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More to this then meets the eye-

much much more------ yes it sure looks like the veteran never filed a timely NOD-as he probably thought it would not matter if he did.

Berta,

First question would be, did the VA send him notification of an adverse action

such as a proposal to reduce, terminate, sever SC - and notify him of his due process rights

which allow 60 days for rebuttal of why this action should not be taken and the right to a hearing.

Second, a NOD would not be a valid response to a notice of adverse action, per M21-1MR.

If the VA would have provided notification prior to implementing the adverse action the vet

could have rebutted this from the get-go and it may have never gotten this far.

I have not read anything yet stating notice was sent to the claimant.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carlie- due to Privacy Act-

the rep I spoke to could not tell me much in detail at all as to whatever the VARO sent to this veteran.

I really have no idea what exactly the vet received from the VA regarding a proposed reduction.

I do know that when VA proposed to reduce my husband they turned on the NOD I prepared and dropped that idea fast.

That was in 1988 however and I am not up quite on the reduction regs.

The NOD I sent in 1988 was a full rebuttal with evidence.Maybe that all has changed on proposed reductions.

I have some major concerns here and won't be posting anymore until I get more facts.

Someone is seeing if I can get permission from the veteran to find out more.

The story is accurate as far as I know.

More to this I can not share here.

yet.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More to this I can not share here.

yet.

Berta,

You little devil - keeping all the meat to yourself :-)

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Carlie and Jim,,,,, I do believe our beloved Berta has smelled blood and now the poor old VA is about to be treed by a very experienced coon dog named Berta........an guess what she is not going to let them come down. God Bless and keep you safe Berta....so many needs and you are already spread out thin.

If the VA can do this to this one vet then the door might get open for more vets having similiar problems within the system. Fighting them off now and winning can make them lick their wounds for a while and have to back off so to speak.

Hang in there girl and know we all love ya. NEVER GIVE UP. God Bless, C.C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use