Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Scars Rating Cue Or Request For Review

Rate this question


georgiapapa

Question

I was in a jeep accident in Vietnam in 1968 which resulted in the transverse fracture through the anatomical neck of the humerous of my left shoulder. I underwent surgery in a field hospital in Vietnam which left a large ugly ragged deep tissue scar on my left shoulder. Shortly after my discharge from the Marine Corps in 1970, I filed a claim for disability with the VA. The VA service connected my shoulder injury at 0% and I appealed their decision and provided the VA with a photograph of the scar on my shoulder. After I appealed, the VA awarded me 10% disability for residuals of fracture of left shoulder. I appealed the 10% award and underwent an exam by the VA in 1971. During the 1971 VA exam, the examining doctor stated the following in his report:

"On examination, there was a 10 and 3/4 inch slighly ragged nonlineal scar running down the anterior left shoulder and into the anterior axilla. The scar was old and well healed and not symptomatic. The veteran could go through all motions with the left shoulder, but it seemed to be somewhat stiff. He complained of pain and tenderness just posterior to the acromioclavicular joint on the left shoulder. X-ray films showed possible minimal cortical irregularity involving the metaphysial region of the left humerus, more apparent in external rotation, compatible with old, healed, remote fracture. The final diagnosis was old fracture, left upper humerus, moderate."

My scar runs from under my arm pit and goes completely over the top of my shoulder. Looking at my shoulder from the front it appears that my arm had been ripped off at the shoulder and sewed back on. The scar's width varies in width from about 3/4 inch to over an inch. Because of my scar's ugly appearance I do not go out in public without a shirt on. Even when I go swimming I always wear a t-shirt to cover the scar. I would estimate my scar covers between eight to ten square inches.

In the Statement of the Case I received from the VA in 1971, it made the following reference concerning their denial of a rating for my scar: "For a compensable rating to he assigned for scars of the shoulder, there must be poor nourishment with repeated ulceration, tenderness and pain on objective demonstration, or limitation of function of the part affected. (Codes 7803, 7804, 7805)." NOTE: Based on this statement by the VA I felt further appeal for a rating for the scar would be futile.

In the Decision paragraph of my final letter from the VA it states the following: "Entitlement to an increased rating for left shoulder disability or to an earlier effective date of the compensable rating for left shoulder disability is not established. Accordingly, thte appeal is denied."

In doing some recent research about the scars rating criteria used by the VA, I discovered the VA has changed their scars rating criteria one or more times since my claim in 1970. The most recent rating criteria I could find (Diagnostic code 7801) Burn scar(s) or scar(s) due to other causes, not of the head, face or neck, that are deep and nonlinear and cover at least 6 square inches but less than 12 square inches is entitled to a 10% rating for the scar. Based on this recent criteria, it appears that I would be rated at 10% if rated by the VA under the current criteria. NOTE: Nothing in the VA decision letter from 1971 referenced Diagnostic Code 7801. It appears the VA indicated in their decision letter that my shoulder scar did not meet any VA criteria for them to even consider a compensable rating for my shoulder.

QUESTION: Does anyone know if Diagnostic Code 7801 contained the same criteria in 1970 as it does today?

QUESTION: If Diagnostic Code 7801 did contain the same criteria in 1970, would I have a basis for a CUE since it appears Diagnostic Code 7801 was not considered in my decision?

QUESTION: If the VA used the correct Diagnostic codes and rated my scar appropriately in 1971, would I be successful in asking the VA for a review and reconsideration to now allow a compensable rating for my scar under the current Diagnostic Code 7801 criteria?

QUESTION: Should the VA have service connected my shoulder scar and at least awarded a 0% rating so the rating could be increased if the criteria changed in the future?

I really feel like I was low balled by the VA when they made the decision about my shoulder but that is water over the dam. I have had other problems with my left shoulder over the years (bursitis, arthritis, torn rotator cuff, etc.) and if I am entitled to any additional compensation for my shoulder I defintely want to file a claim for the additional compensation. Any input or suggestions hadit members can provide would be appreciated.

Georgia Papa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 1

I don't see any Cue basis myself but if your injuries have gotten worse, I would file for a increase on it and include the scars so they could be considered under the present rating schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

When you file a CUE the VA uses the old regulations at the time of the decision. Whatever existed as far as the law for rating scars in 1971 is what would be considered. If the VA did not apply the 1971 regulation correctly you may have a chance. It is a long and hard road. Try and get an increase now and then go for the CUE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Personnally, I would file a CUE on the scar and any muscle groups that may have been affected/effected by the injury and subsequent surgery. Very often, back then, they failed to rate claims properly. Venturing a guess I'd say they screwed up and you could get a nice little retro check. jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I think I agree with Phil on this and while you are at it file for an increase now and file the CUE for what they missed or incorrectly rated back in the day. They are separate claims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with John and Philip.

These are two convoluted decisions by the BVA but reveal 1971 rating codes and info under 1971 schedule of ratings for scars:

http://www.va.gov/vetapp03/Files/0306956.txt

Under Issues

2. Whether the May 1971 rating decision which did not

establish a separate 10 percent rating for scars may be

reversed or amended on the basis of clear and unmistakable

error.

Under Conclusions of Law:

3. An effective date earlier than November 19, 1999, is not

warranted for a separate 10 percent schedular rating for left

hand and wrist scars. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5110 (West 2002);

38 C.F.R. § 3.400 (2002).

(it seems they are saying the scars were not compensable in 1971 but were in 1999 ???)

http://www.va.gov/vetapp03/Files/0307769.txt

Under Issue #2

“Whether there was CUE in a November 1971 rating decision

in that it failed to assign compensable ratings for residuals

of chin, left thigh, right thigh, left arm, and left leg sws.”

(SWS schrapnel wound scars)

Under Finding out fact:

2. “Evidence of record in November 1871 undebatably showed

moderate Muscle Group (MG) VII injury; the remaining sw scars

were not shown to be tender, painful, disfiguring, or

productive of any functional impairment.”

(obviously the 1871 date is a typo=-they mean 1971

"Tender,painful, disfiguring or productive of any functional impairment" seems to be the criteria they used here)

I think there is more to search for to help if you consider a CUE and best to try to get the scar service connected first.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Just on a common sense basis I can't believe you could not get SC'ed for scars in 1971. What about severe burn scars?

What about a scar to your face that disfigures you? I think you can get those scars SC'ed especially if they are painful or limit ROM. Somehow the VA can misinterpret their own regs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use