Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
Our picks
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability ratingPicked By
yellowrose, -
-
Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court
broncovet posted a post in a topic,
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in Re-embursement for non VA Medical care.
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Welcome to hadit!
There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not. Try reading this:
https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/
However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.
When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait! Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?" Not once. Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.
However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.
That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot. There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.
Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.
Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344
Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in What is the DIC timeline?
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Good question.
Maybe I can clear it up.
The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more. (my paraphrase).
More here:
Source:
https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/
NOTE: TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY. This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond. If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Question
georgiapapa
I was in a jeep accident in Vietnam in 1968 which resulted in the transverse fracture through the anatomical neck of the humerous of my left shoulder. I underwent surgery in a field hospital in Vietnam which left a large ugly ragged deep tissue scar on my left shoulder. Shortly after my discharge from the Marine Corps in 1970, I filed a claim for disability with the VA. The VA service connected my shoulder injury at 0% and I appealed their decision and provided the VA with a photograph of the scar on my shoulder. After I appealed, the VA awarded me 10% disability for residuals of fracture of left shoulder. I appealed the 10% award and underwent an exam by the VA in 1971. During the 1971 VA exam, the examining doctor stated the following in his report:
"On examination, there was a 10 and 3/4 inch slighly ragged nonlineal scar running down the anterior left shoulder and into the anterior axilla. The scar was old and well healed and not symptomatic. The veteran could go through all motions with the left shoulder, but it seemed to be somewhat stiff. He complained of pain and tenderness just posterior to the acromioclavicular joint on the left shoulder. X-ray films showed possible minimal cortical irregularity involving the metaphysial region of the left humerus, more apparent in external rotation, compatible with old, healed, remote fracture. The final diagnosis was old fracture, left upper humerus, moderate."
My scar runs from under my arm pit and goes completely over the top of my shoulder. Looking at my shoulder from the front it appears that my arm had been ripped off at the shoulder and sewed back on. The scar's width varies in width from about 3/4 inch to over an inch. Because of my scar's ugly appearance I do not go out in public without a shirt on. Even when I go swimming I always wear a t-shirt to cover the scar. I would estimate my scar covers between eight to ten square inches.
In the Statement of the Case I received from the VA in 1971, it made the following reference concerning their denial of a rating for my scar: "For a compensable rating to he assigned for scars of the shoulder, there must be poor nourishment with repeated ulceration, tenderness and pain on objective demonstration, or limitation of function of the part affected. (Codes 7803, 7804, 7805)." NOTE: Based on this statement by the VA I felt further appeal for a rating for the scar would be futile.
In the Decision paragraph of my final letter from the VA it states the following: "Entitlement to an increased rating for left shoulder disability or to an earlier effective date of the compensable rating for left shoulder disability is not established. Accordingly, thte appeal is denied."
In doing some recent research about the scars rating criteria used by the VA, I discovered the VA has changed their scars rating criteria one or more times since my claim in 1970. The most recent rating criteria I could find (Diagnostic code 7801) Burn scar(s) or scar(s) due to other causes, not of the head, face or neck, that are deep and nonlinear and cover at least 6 square inches but less than 12 square inches is entitled to a 10% rating for the scar. Based on this recent criteria, it appears that I would be rated at 10% if rated by the VA under the current criteria. NOTE: Nothing in the VA decision letter from 1971 referenced Diagnostic Code 7801. It appears the VA indicated in their decision letter that my shoulder scar did not meet any VA criteria for them to even consider a compensable rating for my shoulder.
QUESTION: Does anyone know if Diagnostic Code 7801 contained the same criteria in 1970 as it does today?
QUESTION: If Diagnostic Code 7801 did contain the same criteria in 1970, would I have a basis for a CUE since it appears Diagnostic Code 7801 was not considered in my decision?
QUESTION: If the VA used the correct Diagnostic codes and rated my scar appropriately in 1971, would I be successful in asking the VA for a review and reconsideration to now allow a compensable rating for my scar under the current Diagnostic Code 7801 criteria?
QUESTION: Should the VA have service connected my shoulder scar and at least awarded a 0% rating so the rating could be increased if the criteria changed in the future?
I really feel like I was low balled by the VA when they made the decision about my shoulder but that is water over the dam. I have had other problems with my left shoulder over the years (bursitis, arthritis, torn rotator cuff, etc.) and if I am entitled to any additional compensation for my shoulder I defintely want to file a claim for the additional compensation. Any input or suggestions hadit members can provide would be appreciated.
Georgia Papa
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
3
1
1
1
Popular Days
Jun 30
4
Jun 29
3
Top Posters For This Question
john999 3 posts
Philip Rogers 1 post
caubulldog 1 post
georgiapapa 1 post
Popular Days
Jun 30 2011
4 posts
Jun 29 2011
3 posts
6 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now