Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

10 Worst States For Unemployed 9/11 Veterans

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Subject: [VeteranIssues] 10 Worst States for Unemployed 9/11 Veterans

Date: Jun 30, 2011 3:56 AM

http://moneywatch.bn...-veterans/1302/

As bad as the Great Recession has been for civilians, it's been even tougher on veterans. Thejobless recovery for 9/11 veterans unemployed servicemen and women who fought in Iraq and Afghanistan is much worse than the national average and shockingly bad in a number of states, a new Senate report shows.

Even among all former U.S. military service members, 9/11 veterans have the highest rates of unemployment, according to the latest report from the U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee. The numbers are more appalling when measured against the total U.S. workforce. The unemployment rate for 9/11 veterans stood at 10.9 percent at the end of April (the latest date for which data were available) vs. 8.5 percent for the non-veterans, according to the report. (Seasonally adjusted figures put the total U.S. unemployment rate at 9 percent for April.)

May was even more dismal for 9/11 veterans, according to Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA), when their unemployment rate jumped to more than 12 percent vs. a national average of 9.1 percent. "[The unemployment rate for 9/11 veterans] generally trends more than three percentage points higher than the national average, and spikes to nearly 20 percent for male veterans ages 18 to 24," says Matt Gallagher, IAVA senior writing manager and a former Army captain, via email.

Work Type and Prejudice Partly to Blame

There are a number of factors contributing to higher unemployment rates for 9/11 veterans, the Senate report says. Perhaps the biggest contributor is that the vets were more likely to be working in mining, construction, manufacturing and other sectors of the economy that were hardest hit by the recession.

But that's only partly borne out by the list below. True, Michigan has the highest unemployment rate for 9/11 veterans, for example, and it has one of the highest overall jobless rates, too. However, California, Florida, Mississippi, Rhode Island and South Carolina all suffer from double-digit unemployment and yet none of them are among the top 10 worst states for jobless 9/11 veterans.

Here are the figures for the states with the highest rates of unemployed 9/11 veterans, according to the Senate report. For comparison, total state unemployment rates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics are in parentheses. In many states the unemployment rate for 9/11 veterans is three times higher than the state's overall level.

1. Michigan 29.4 percent (10.3)

2. Indiana 23.6 percent (8.2)

3. Minnesota 22.9 percent (6.6)

4. Montana 20.1 percent (7.3)

5. Tennessee 20 percent (9.7)

6. Kansas 17.2 percent (6.6)

7. Vermont 16.8 percent (5.4)

8. Connecticut 15.5 percent (9.1)

9. Nevada 15.2 percent (12.1)

10. New York 15.2 percent (7.9)

Another factor contributing to the dispiriting data are higher rates of disability among 9/11 veterans, the report notes. Advances in medicine save more veterans' lives than ever before, but that's also led to an increase in people who are unable to work because of service-related trauma. Additionally, men have been more likely than women to have lost jobs due to the recession, and of the 2.5 million 9/11 veterans, more than 80 percent are men, according to the report.

Prejudice also plays a role in 9/11 veteran unemployment, says Gallagher. Hiring veterans is a smart business move, given the work ethics, leadership skills and technological skills young men and women returning from combat possess, he says. "Unfortunately, many of our members have reported encountering vet stigmas during interviews with potential employers," Gallagher says. "The 'crazy vet' stereotype is unfair and inaccurate, and not representative at all of the best and the brightest that have fought these wars."

Whatever the reasons behind the shameful unemployment data, some estimates say the economy won't get back to full employment until 2020. It looks to be an even harder, longer slog for the 9/11 veterans

Read more: http://moneywatch.bn.../#ixzz1Qkuqvij4

"Keep on, Keepin' on"

Dan Cedusky, Champaign IL "Colonel Dan"

See my web site at:

http://www.angelfire.../VeteranIssues/

http://www.facebook.com/dan.cedusky

Edited by allan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Well, it is not surprising that Indiana is in second place. Has to be one of the most anti-veteran states around.

Papa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Yes, and notice the unemployment rate for Vets is almost always worse.

Why should the VET rate be worse than the civilian unemployment rate?:

The obvious answer is the government programs to give Vet preference in hiring are not working. I know..I applied at many places and the 10 points on the cival service test for Vets is largely a joke, as these statistics show.

Many, many times the VA and other places would hire civilians without a college degree and "pass over" me, when I had a college degree.

Once, my job counselor explained to me the VA has special "secret" programs which supervisors use to hire NON Vets, when Vets also apply. The theory is, that the Veteran candidates are less qualified than the NON VET. Balderdash. You see, the Va does not want too many Vets...they would want to provide too good of service to Vets.

There should be no reason that the VA has 2/3 of their employees civilians while Vets are going without a job. Telling the VA you are a Vet virtually ensures you wont be getting a job there.

ONE of the ways, at these secret VA supervisor meetings, the VA prevents the hiring of Veterans is instead of calling the job an "opening", they call it a "promotion". You see, Vets dont get preference in promotions, so when the Va does a job opening and calls it a "promotion" instead of an opening, they dont have to hire Vets. By cheating, they keep the Vet numbers low, and can continue bad service to Vets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I got a job as a disabled vet at the post office doing a job a monkey could do. It was the best paying job I ever got including jobs that required a college degree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everytime our government has started winding down from some overseas war we have had high unemployment.That is why they always like to keep a small war going to thin the herd, keep some what peace time numbers up for defense.It has been this way for as long as I can remember. The VietNam Era, the employers had already replaced us and THEY thought that we came with too much mental baggage to make room for OUR return home.I found if I said I was a Vet, whether I saw combat or not, they believed that all we knew was how to fight and kill and that our pyschies were reprogramed. The media kept enough high profile cases in the news where a Vet lost it to keep the publics mindset against us.Even tho I served in Korea, the judge that granted my wifes divorce while I was overseas granted her full custody of my son and I couldn't be with him unless she approved and she never approved. I was PROUD that I enlisted into the service, instead of running to Canada,Hiding behind school books or paying some attorney to keep me out of the service. So to get spat upon at San Francisco airport,or get turned down for the simplest of jobs hurt twice as much. Only ones for about 10 years that knew I was a Vet was other Vets. I hated to have to hide something I was proud of doing.Then after going to a VA hospital for some help and to wait for 12 hours only to be blown off by my country again.It would be 20 Years before I would ever trust the VA system again.I saw how they treated my dad and I decided to give them a second chance.Only to have them blow that second chance after only 2 years and screw me up in a surgery.Since then it has only been lies and 3rd class medical treatment. I get so mad everytime I see the media say something like Our returning troops are starting to get the same kind of treatment that our VeitNam vets got when they came home!! Did I miss something?? Was there a time when we received good treatment and I missed it? Forty years ago when my Brothers and Sisters in combat came home they fought invisible ghosts of war for many years. Now our ghosts are REAL PEOPLE who work for the VA system. Nameless, faceless people who believe they hold our fates in their precious hands.Even tho they have rules or regulations they are suppose to follow, they don't and they suffer no penalites.OIG is suppose to oversee them, but they protect them instead.I filed a complaint with them when my VAMC altered documents,when my RO knowingly put false info into my claim file, I let them know. Did they followup like they would if we broke the rules, NO!! Instead I got the Third Degree for trying to get them involved in my claim.Until government employees are held responsible for their jobs, they have no incentive to change their bad habits. I hope Congress has the courage to layoff about10% of the dead wood come budget time. Maybe the rest will change their attitudes and things will begin to get done. I know we will be cut in benefits like everyone else. I just hope I get mine before they take them away. We will have more Mean testing.I forsee the day that the max a vet can get in benefits will be 100% no matter what. No double coverages of insurance. If you can afford civilian insurance, you will lose your veterans. All medical centers will be critical care only medical services. The Boise center only serves those who have life threatening illness or injuries. They maintain a constant 3500 vet waiting list. The Portland Medical center handles everything from colds to transplants.They will be the first to have cutbacks in services.It will only get worse from here on out I'm afraid. Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, it is not surprising that Indiana is in second place. Has to be one of the most anti-veteran states around.

Papa

Indiana is actually fairly veteran friendly. Free hunting fishing license (only 10%). Property tax abatement (only 10%). Kids get to go to any state college in Indiana ( only 10%) Www.in.gov/dva:2343.htm. I could keep going but you get the drift.

Signed,

The Hoosier

P.s. You should have seen the shock on my face when I moved to TN and got nothing but a fishing license, and that was only after going from 10 to 30%. Everything else you lractically have to be 100%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use