Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Decision Incomptency

Rate this question


kydale

Question

  • Group: 82nd AIRBORNE
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: Today, 07:49 PM
  • Location:Kentucky
  • Interests:GOD First, My HARLEY
  • Service Connected Disability: 100%
  • Branch of Service: US ARMY Sgt. 82nd Airborne
  • State: Ky

Edited by kydale
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Lead Moderator

Ok, I will take a guess.

It sounds like, yes, you are being awarded benefits for PTSD or another mental illness or at least pension. It is possible, but not likely, that you are being awarded NSC PENSION, but are declared incompetent. This could happen if the VA thinks you have a mental illnes that is NOT related to military service.

I am unaware of the VA EVER declaring a Veteran "incompetent", but then not compensating him.

I dont see how the VA could decide, on one hand, that you are suffering from a mental disorder so severe that you are "incompetent", while handing you zero percent. The most likely thing is you are awarded 100%, but you also must have a fiduciary to handle your finances.

My advice: If you have a wife or trusted family friend, then try to get him or her appointed as your fiduciary, and NOT a fiduciary the VA picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THANK YOU so much. I am retired disability Social Security and dis State Govt retirement. I was a Sworn State Police Officer and the incompetent thing bothers me about my CCDW Permit.

Yes, I have no problem with wife being appointed. She also works for State Police. I have my deceased father and 2 brothers deceased and posess their guns holding until their grandsons are grown to appreciate them and treasure them. I'd like to not have to give them up. As a Former sworn officer, I feel me having my weapons is legit? I want my comp but, Im not incomptent at all. If I were, I would have killed a man that murdered my 32 ye old brother and a 28 yr old man that raped my 11 yr old daughter. Several years ago. Any info or input greatly appreciated.

Thank You my Brother

GOD BLESS YOU

DALE

Ok, I will take a guess.

It sounds like, yes, you are being awarded benefits for PTSD or another mental illness or at least pension. It is possible, but not likely, that you are being awarded NSC PENSION, but are declared incompetent. This could happen if the VA thinks you have a mental illnes that is NOT related to military service.

I am unaware of the VA EVER declaring a Veteran "incompetent", but then not compensating him.

I dont see how the VA could decide, on one hand, that you are suffering from a mental disorder so severe that you are "incompetent", while handing you zero percent. The most likely thing is you are awarded 100%, but you also must have a fiduciary to handle your finances.

My advice: If you have a wife or trusted family friend, then try to get him or her appointed as your fiduciary, and NOT a fiduciary the VA picks.

Edited by kydale
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Get your 100% rating in hand and then you can appeal the incompetency decision. I don't think you can have the carry permit and be rated incompetent. I am not sure how the VA communicates with your state. I think I would get some legal advise on this situation. As far as your guns you could give them to someone in your family to hold for you until you get competency back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Get your 100% rating in hand and then you can appeal the incompetency decision. I don't think you can have the carry permit and be rated incompetent. I am not sure how the VA communicates with your state. I think I would get some legal advise on this situation. As far as your guns you could give them to someone in your family to hold for you until you get competency back.

TYSM SIR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Get your 100% rating in hand and then you can appeal the incompetency decision. I don't think you can have the carry permit and be rated incompetent. I am not sure how the VA communicates with your state. I think I would get some legal advise on this situation. As far as your guns you could give them to someone in your family to hold for you until you get competency back.

I received my Award papers today at 100% SERVICE CONNECTED. Says a proposed Incomptenet exist? Any insight appreciated. NOTHING MENTIONED ABOUT BACKPAY.

Edited by kydale
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use