Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

I Hear All's Fair In Love And War . . .

Rate this question


carlie

Question

I hear all's fair in love and war . . . . . . . . .

Well I have 2 new C&P appointments over the next couple of weeks,

I love the VA compensation but they force me to go to war with them

to get it.

Time to get out the boxing gloves again . . . . .

No, on second thought I prefer the idea of a handfull of sand directly into the face

then jabbing a sharp blade from the trachea down completely into the pit of the stomach !

The above, is known otherwise by many as . . . . evidence.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Guest terrysturgis

Carlie, most of us only know you from the Hadit forum. Should any one inquire of me if I thought Carlie would get tired of the game and give up on her claim my answer would be "Hell No!" Keep the pressure on. Terry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the C&P for tomorrow, one issue is for GERD - with regurgitation (gross)

on a very regular basis.

A prior C&P examiner stated my diagnosis was GERD and my upper GI showed a small hiatal hernia.

That I take NSAID's several times weekly for my SC'd headaches but to relate the GERD to the

NSAIDS's would be mere speculation.

Since that C&P and denial for GERD, I have gotten SC'd for Asthma and Chronic Bronchitis,

which the VAMC RX's me oral steroids and bronchial inhalers with steroids.

I will be asking the C&P examiner to comment on if it is as at least likely as not that the

NASID's, Steroids and Inhalers I take for SC'd conditions, are a contributing factor in

the aggravation of my GERD, thereby a secondary condition.

I will be printing out and taking the following BVA decisions with me, so if the examiner tells me

NO - to the above statement I can show the examiner these decisions and ask the examiner

what is so different and special about my GERD, that would make the above less likely than not,

a contributing factor of aggravation.

How does this plan sound ?

- - - - - -

The three threshold requirements that must be met to establish secondary service connection are: (1) Competent(medical diagnosis) evidence of current disability for which service connection is sought. This requirement is met as GERD is diagnosed. (2) Evidence of an already service-connected disability. This requirement is also met, as the Veteran's left knee disability is service connected and (3) Competent evidence of a nexus between the service-connected disability and the disability for which secondary service connection is claimed.As there was conflicting evidence regarding whether the Veteran's GERD was secondary to NSAIDs prescribed for his service connected left knee disability, the Board sought an advisory medical opinion from a VA expert in this matter. The consulting VA gastroenterologist reviewed the record, and opined that the Veteran's GERD was likely due to his service-connected prescriptions of NSAIDs; and furthermore, that it was very likely that any underlying and pre-existing GERD was aggravated by the NSAIDS. The consulting physician based the opinion on a review of the record, and explained the rationale for the opinion, with citations to medical literature. As he clearly has expertise in determining the etiology of the disability at issue, and his opinion provides the best explanation of the medical principles involved, the Board finds the VHA specialist's opinion probative and persuasive evidence that establishes that the NSAIDS prescribed in treatment for the Veteran's service connected left knee disability likely caused (and in the event mild GERD pre-existed such treatment, aggravated) the Veteran's GERD. In light of the foregoing, the Board finds that the third (and final) requirement for establishing secondary service connection is also met, and that service connection for GERD as secondary to NSAIDs prescribed in treatment for the Veteran's service-connected left knee disability is warranted.ORDERSecondary service connection for GERD is granted.- - - - - - http://www.va.gov/vetapp09/Files1/0902694.txtWhile steroids and NSAIDs may not have caused GERD, certainly these medications can exacerbate reflux symptoms. Furthermore, these medications can cause espophagitis, gastritis, and ulcers, complications [that] the veteran has been found to have on endoscopy.He concluded that a number of factors can worsen or aggravate reflux including steroids as well as smoking; and, that it was as least likely as not that steroids and/or NSAIDs aggravated his GERD.- - - - - - - - - http://www.va.gov/vetapp09/Files1/0902694.txt

While both VA examiners concluded that the medications taken

for the service-connected low back disability and COPD did

not cause the veteran's GERD, at least one VA examiner

concluded that the medications taken for the service-

connected back disability and COPD aggravated the GERD. When

the aggravation of a non-service-connected disorder is

proximately due to or the result of a service-connected

disorder, service connection is warranted. Allen v. Brown, 7

Vet. App. 439, 448 (1995). The Board finds the statement of

the VA examiner, combined with the private positive nexus

opinions submitted by the veteran, to be sufficient medical

evidence of a link between the medications and the veteran's

claimed aggravation of his GERD. Overall, the preponderance

of the evidence is in favor of the veteran's claim, as such

service connection is warranted on a secondary basis.

ORDER

Entitlement to service connection for GERD, to include as

secondary to the service-connected conditions of COPD and

cervical disc back disability, is granted.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always thought it was funny to take a lit cigarrette and jam it up a guy's nose and then grab the nose and pinch it shut for as long as you can hold on. It doesn't take very many of those before people will leave you the hell alone.

I haven't figured out a way to jam burning embers up the VA but I am working on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Founder

Well as usual our Carlie is loaded for bear :)

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Carlie, I imagine you have copied contemporary, supportive evidence --to show the service-connected medication can aggravate the NSC Gerd? Also, the diagnosis of hernia is minimized in the course of the arguments presented presented; what's up with the hernia? Can the hernia cause Gerd? Is the herniia another issue to be service connected? You keep fighting, I am proud of your gumption, and you weild a sharpened sword!! ~Wings

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use