Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Claim While Claim At Bva

Rate this question


Robert Thomas

Question

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

A friend just told me that he recently submitted a new claim while he had a claim at the BVA. I told him I thought that it might hang up his BVA claim. He is already at 70% going for his TDIU. Any thoughts?

Do you know what the claim at the BVA is about?

It is not too unusual to have one at the BVA and then file a new one at the VARO-on different issues-

But if they are same thing- I am concerned-

The VA's prime goal is to save money-

Therefore they could -if on TDIU- award retro only to the recent claim's date, but then again this evidence he could use at the BVA if that is the same issue? ????

This is kind of an odd situation

can you tell us more?

Berta

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
A friend just told me that he recently submitted a new claim while he had a claim at the BVA. I told him I thought that it might hang up his BVA claim. He is already at 70% going for his TDIU. Any thoughts?

-------------o----------------

Robert:

From experiences that I have heard about ...

If the NEW claim filing is for a DIFFERENT issue than the the one at the BVA ... then I would file it.

I am presently in the same position and I am filing on the new claims that are NOT at the BVA.

If I am making a mistake on this advice .. someone please jump in and correct me.

Magoo :unsure: ... aka ... Bill

PS .. When I type in .. CAPS .. I am not yelling ... I do this so my brain will pickup certain words and hopefully not make a mistake in my post.

<b>... Magoo ... </b>

<b>... At this very moment ... many in the U.S. Military are in ... "HARM'S WAY" ... please, let us NOT forget them ...</b>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill-I feel the sameo sameo way-

New issue -VARO- and let the BVA take care of the old issue.(depending on what that old issue is)

Example: Incountry Vietnam Vet was diagnosed with DMII in 1998 by VA.

Vet filed claim in 1999 for SC of it

VA denied and it went to the BVA.

May 8, 2001- DMII to AO regs come out.

Sept 23, 2005 vet finds he has heart disease due to diabetes and files for this heart disease due to service. The doctor merely states it is vascular involvement due to high tryglycerides because of his diabetes.

He tries again on the new claim.

The BVA must remand for VARO to SC his diabetes as it appeared as an NSC condition in a rating decision prior to May 8, 2001. But it might sit be sitting there without a remand.

Meantime, the heart condition ,related to the DMII is recognised by an adjudicator as AO presumptive (they actually read his DD 214 or his past appeal)

The VARO could make an award on the secondary connection and cue themselves on the BVA appeal decision-

In any event -this veteran should receive retro back to the initial date of 1999 when he filed first claim under Nehmer Stipulations and Retroactive Awards.

Then again -I might be half baked here- any discussion?

Would the new VARO decision make the BVA appeal moot?

It should, if they consider all EED due the vet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • In Memoriam

If anything gets held up, it will be the claim at the RO.espcially if it is related to something in the claims file.The solution for that is to file a FOIA with the BVA. They are very nice about thjis and wil get it to you in 10 days or so. Then copy any re;evant records and give thm to the RO.

If the RO doesn't nee any information from the claims file, they will crete a temp file and work the claim up,

Alex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My TDIU appeal recently went back to the BVA from a remand from the AMC to the RO. While it was at the RO I filed a CUE because I was not awarded 10% for arthritis found during left knee sugery while still siill in service. I was rated 10% for limitation of motion (5260). I also asked for 10% for removal of cartlage (5259) and was told by the RO 5260 covered 5259. Nothing about the 10% for arthritis.

I also had applied for arthritis of the right knee secondary to severe arthritis of the left knee. C&P x-ray showed arthritis in the right knee. When the examiner wrote his findings he wrote " Right knee PAIN is cause by left knee disability. The RO (playing their WORD games again) stated the VA dosen't compensate for pain. I reminded them the X-RAY showed arthritis, which they promptly ignored.

During my last ortho appointment my examiner actually said " right knee arthritis is caused by the left knee disibility due most of his weight being transfereed to the right side. He has been fitted with a loader brace and loftstrand crutches.

I sent the new evidence to the BVA. I have a question: Can the BVA rate this new evidence or will it have to be remanded to the RO? If it goed back to the RO again, I know I'll have another uear or more wait as with the last remand.

any idea's? comments? direction? Any and all will greatly appreciated.

WAYNE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use