Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Upcoming Review Of All Disability Claims?

Rate this question


slangpdx

Question

Post #27 at the URL below on the NYTimes web site is by a vet who says his VA doctor told him there is a planned upcoming review soon of all disability claims with an aim to cutting benefits wherever possible. Has anyone heard anything about this ? I was expecting such a thing but didn't think it would happen until after the 2012 election.

http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2011/11/14/opinion/krugman-vouchers-for-veterans-and-other-bad-ideas.html?sort=oldest&offset=2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

slangpdx - please don't come here and yell "fire!" Think about what you're saying. The VA can't deal w/the backlog of claims, so how could they possibly do this type of review???!!! Someday down the road, perhaps, but I wouldn't worry now. jmo

pr

Post #27 at the URL below on the NYTimes web site is by a vet who says his VA doctor told him there is a planned upcoming review soon of all disability claims with an aim to cutting benefits wherever possible. Has anyone heard anything about this ? I was expecting such a thing but didn't think it would happen until after the 2012 election.

http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2011/11/14/opinion/krugman-vouchers-for-veterans-and-other-bad-ideas.html?sort=oldest&offset=2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Post #27 at the URL below on the NYTimes web site is by a vet who says his VA doctor told him there is a planned upcoming review soon

of all disability claims with an aim to cutting benefits wherever possible.

Has anyone heard anything about this ?

I was expecting such a thing but didn't think it would happen until after the 2012 election.

http://community.nyt...oldest&offset=2

slang,

This is nothing but he said / she said BS.

Someone posting on a web site what their interpretation, of their psychiatrist interpretation,

of something that possibly could happen.

VBA can't handle what they have now, not only that - but if any claimant that is not P&T

or for that matter - not yet covered by the 10/20 year rules of protection

THEY ARE ALREADY (and always have been)

fair game for the VBA to do a review, any danged time they desire to do so.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Considering the VA's past record, anything is possible.

Pure conjecture on my part- - -

The VA has a large number of new hires that are not ready/qualified to work existing or new claims. The training process is going to take time, and many of the experienced people that need to be involved in the training process are mostly tied up in getting cases out the door. What better task than to have the trainees review older claims, and suggest that some of the claims need to be considered for reductions. Do you think that "consider for increase" will be ignored, or just not done? <G>

slangpdx - please don't come here and yell "fire!" Think about what you're saying. The VA can't deal w/the backlog of claims, so how could they possibly do this type of review???!!! Someday down the road, perhaps, but I wouldn't worry now. jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe you are overestimating the difficulty of the "new" claims yet at the same time underestimating the ease of those "older" claims.

If your goal is to generate an SPF of NODs and appeals, this would be the way to do it. I mean, if you're not qualified to rate it, how can you be qualified to suggest to reduce it?

Considering the VA's past record, anything is possible.

Pure conjecture on my part- - -

The VA has a large number of new hires that are not ready/qualified to work existing or new claims. The training process is going to take time, and many of the experienced people that need to be involved in the training process are mostly tied up in getting cases out the door. What better task than to have the trainees review older claims, and suggest that some of the claims need to be considered for reductions. Do you think that "consider for increase" will be ignored, or just not done? <G>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use