Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Incompetency C&p Exam

Rate this question


Sidney56

Question

Hey guys....it been a while since I posted, as this is not my best time of year.

I get really depressed when it seems I should be joyful with others. Oh well, things

could be worse I suppose. My question:

As posted earlier, I was awarded 100% P&T last August and found to be incompetent in

July of this year. I had a VA field examiner come out and interview myself and wife and

these were her exact statements. She recommended my wife to be my fiduciary and suggested

that I get a IMO to refute the previous C&P exam that proposed incompetency. She stated that

if I was incompetent, she surely must be incompetent! She suggested that I not go to a VA doc

for the opinion, but someone from the outside.

I immediately filed an appeal asking for a DRO hearing through my local VSO. He said it would

probably take about 12-15 months to get a hearing. He sent me to a psychiatric doctor that

specializes in these issues. Upon my first visit, the doctor was furious and stated that he sees

this type of injustice all the time. He had me do a exam with his psychologist and said he would

review the findings. Upon my next visit, he stated that he found no evidence of incompetency and

would write a letter stating that fact. A week later, the letter was in my mail. I took it to my

VSO and he immediately faxed a copy of the letter to the Regional Office DRO and he received a call

from the Regional office the next day(last Tuesday) stating that a hearing had already been scheduled, but there was

no need for me to attend it, because she was scheduling a new C&P. My VSO said he was astounded because

he had never witnessed the process moving so fast and I should receive a C&P sometime the first of next

year.

Well, I received a call today from my VAMC stating that a C&P exam has been scheduled for the 23rd of

this month(next week)! What the hell!

I have seen a lot of examples of IMOs on the board and they were very detailed. My letter is short and

simple. I asked my VSO about this, and he said it was all I needed. He has been right so far. What do you

guys think of the letter?

To: Mr. VSO

Re: Mr. Me

Dear Mr. VSO,

I have been treating Mr. Me psychiatrically since September 27, 2011 for Post-traumatic Stress Disorder(PTSD).

It is my opinion that Mr. Me is mentally competent to manage his financial affairs. He does not need or require

a payer to manage his monies.

Respectfully,

Signature

Dr Name, MD

It is too late for him to revise the letter, because it has already been submitted as evidence. I see where

everyone is saying that the letter would be shot down if it does not state that he has "reviewed all my medical

records". I even put this question to him at my first visit, and he stated that he has read all the C&P exams rendered

by the VA and they are all boiler plate. He actually was an examiner for the VA for many years. I have a tele-conference with his office this morning @ 10:30 as a follow-up concerning the meds he prescribed for me. Should I question his

IMO format?

Things are moving so fast, that I feel like I'm caught in a whirl wind!

Edited by Sidney56
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

My last post was very long....sorry :biggrin:

One thing that I failed to mention was, on my last scheduled mental health appointment

I was sent to a new doctor. I asked her why I had a change of doctors and she told me that

my previous doctor had been assigned as a C&P examiner. Wouldn't it be a conflict of interest

if she(first doctor) or the previous C&P examiner performed this exam?

I told her that I was seeing an outside psychiatrist and he asked her to fill the prescriptions

that he had written. She refused to fill one, but did fill the other. She also stated that she

would not treat me if I am seeing another(outside) doctor. She set-up another appointment

with her in 4 mos to give me time to determine who I wanted to treat me. This is a no-brainer.

I do however, continue to keep all my appointments.

Edited by Sidney56
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My last post was very long....sorry :biggrin:

One thing that I failed to mention was, on my last scheduled mental health appointment

I was sent to a new doctor. I asked her why I had a change of doctors and she told me that

my previous doctor had been assigned as a C&P examiner. Wouldn't it be a conflict of interest

if she(first doctor) or the previous C&P examiner performed this exam?

I told her that I was seeing an outside psychiatrist and he asked her to fill the prescriptions

that he had written. She refused to fill one, but did fill the other. She also stated that she

would not treat me if I am seeing another(outside) doctor. She set-up another appointment

with her in 4 mos to give me time to determine who I wanted to treat me. This is a no-brainer.

I do however, continue to keep all my appointments.

good question.my longtime ortho doc did many of my exams after he left the va and even when he came back. a former vso told me i had grounds to have the last exam he ever did for me thrown out due to conflict of interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use