Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dermatologists....

Rate this question


Sgt. Wilky

Question

Hello All,

I live in the Fort Collins, CO area, and I'm having a hard time finding a Dermatologist or Podiatrist willing to give me a nexus letter. None of the doctors that I have spoken with (actually, their receptionists) are willing to touch anything related to the VA. Here's my issue...I have a 'severe fungal infection' that I've been told is not curable. My SMR's state this, and I do have private treatment records since I've been out, which the VA has acknowledged. The VA in their infinite wisdom, stated that I didn't have this form of Athletes foot, but instead, I have hyperhidrosis. I read that and said to myself, "What the #$%^ is that?" I googled it, and I don't exhibit ANY of the major symptoms of hyperhidrosis. My feet do not sweat profusely, they don't stink to high heaven, in fact they're so dry, they crack and bleed, and I'm constantly putting lotion and creams on to keep them from bleeding. Anyway, I've tried everything, it's barely manageable. So, I now need to find a doctor who is willing to call the VA out on the carpet regarding their "diagnosis". The VA flat out lied in my C & P exam. Does anyone know of a Derm. or Podia. that is in Colorado or WY that has any expierence with this? And, can anyone tell me why there are no doctors willing to go against the VA?

Thanks!!

Sgt. Wilky

BOHICA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Sgt. Wilky,

I don't think it is a fear of the VA persay, but doctors in general get a little/ scratch that/ they get very nervous when people want them to get involved in a legal action.

First steps,

Is this the initial decision? Have you filed your notice of disagreement? You have one year from the date of the decision to appeal it.

Do not miss this deadline.

As for finding a Dr. You might check with some attorney's offices that specialize in soc sec, workers comp, or malpractice and see if they will tell you who they would suggest. A refferal from this source puts you in touch with a doctor that already does this type of work.

You might try universities with medical schools, the faculty/doctors at these institutions are not as timid (due to the tenure system).

Read the exam and test notes carefully, in some cases the C&P doctors are so wrong that they contradict themselves. Read the exam form for the type of condition you have (i believe all exam forms are on this site). Look in the clinicians guide (i found it on google), see if they did or didn't follow the rules listed there. If you are going the DRO route you might be able to get a new C&P exam during this process (if you are going direct to BVA GET an IMO) if you can make a covincing fact based argument on why the exam is wrong/insufficient.

Best of luck and best regards,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

71M10

Yes, doctors are scared to death of being involved in any legal question because they are afraid they will be called to testify. My private psychiatrist was called to testify in another state due to fact of an opinion he made that a patient should not have been discharged early from a local hospital. The patient killed herself. Now he is involved in wrongful death case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You might be able to find a Doc that Social Security Lawyers use for their clients. Just call one and ask if they would give you a Doc for IMO for VA.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I had a similar problem. The RO said the condition I had in the military was different than the condition I had after the military. I was denied without the benefit of a C&P exam Every time I had a flare of condition after my denial I went to the VA for treatment. I did not say anything about a claim. After the appointment I went to the records office and got the reports from treatment. Wouldn't you know it the VA treating doctors were calling my condition by the same uncurable diagnosis that they called it in the military. I pilled up about ten treatment reports from VA treatements after the denial and I submitted the reports and was service connected without ever having a C&P,

My suggestion is that you go to the VA for treatment and see if they call your condition hydrosis or a fungal condition. Do not say anything about a claim. However, make sure they are noting in the records observed symptoms that are occuring right in front of their eyes. If they do not say they saw observable symptoms the RO will not give weight to their statements. While at the appointment with the VA treating doctors it does not hurt to tell them that you did some research on line and you think it looks like a fungal infection. If you had an uncurable condition in the military all you need is a current diagnosis of the same condition. I doubt they could use an intercurrent post service injury argument for a fungal condition. However, I have seen RO raters try it and then lose on appeal. The current condition must meet the rating schedule requirement for frequency and severity. Treatment records can rebut a C&P exam. A big pile of treatment notes is very hard for a rater to ignore.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use