Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Common Law And Deemed Valid Marriages And


Berta

Question

In some cases VA will recognize a common law surviving spouse for DIC purposes.

"The laws dictate that to be recognized as the veteran's

surviving spouse for the purpose of establishing entitlement

to VA benefits, the appellant must be a person of the

opposite sex who was the spouse of a veteran at the time of

the veteran's death, and who lived with the veteran

continuously from the date of marriage to the date of the

veteran's death (except where there was a separation which

was due to the misconduct of, or procured by, the veteran

without the fault of the spouse) and has not remarried." 38

U.S.C.A. § 101(3); 38 C.F.R. § 3.50(b)(1).

"Additionally, for a surviving spouse to qualify for benefits,

additional factors must be established by the evidence. DIC

may be paid to a surviving spouse of a veteran who died on or

after January 1, 1957, and who was married to the veteran:

(1) before the expiration of 15 years after the termination

of the period of service in which the injury or disease

causing death was incurred, or aggravated; (2) for one year

or more prior to the veteran's death; (3) for any period of

time if a child was born of the marriage or was born to them

before the marriage." 38 C.F.R. § 3.54.

"A recognized marriage for VA purposes is defined as one which

is valid under the law of the place where the parties resided

at the time of marriage, or the law of the place where the

parties resided when the right to benefits accrued." 38

U.S.C.A. § 103©; 38 C.F.R. § 3.102.

In this BVA decision Common law is further defined as to what evidence is required:

http://www.va.gov/vetapp10/Files6/1043681.txt

“For VA benefits purposes, a marriage means a marriage valid under

the law of the place where the parties resided at the time of

marriage, or the law of the place where the parties resided when

the right to benefits accrued. 38 C.F.R. § 3.1(j)."

"A marriage can be established by several types of evidence,

including a copy or abstract of the public record of marriage, a

copy of the church record of marriage containing sufficient data,

an official report from service department as to marriage which

occurred while the Veteran was in service, the affidavit of the

clergyman or magistrate who officiated, the original certificate

of marriage, and affidavits or certified statements of two or

more eyewitnesses to the ceremony. 38 C.F.R. § 3.205(a)(1).”

What VA means as to “law of the place where the parties resided ...etc.”

means if the state law recognizes Common Law.

For example I was approached regarding a DIC claim for a local widow.

But she was never married to the veteran and NY is not a common law state.She is not the veteran's surviving spouse per VA regulations,not even under any of the other conditions that could have deemed her relationship as a valid marriage.

These other conditions, if met, however would cause the VA to deem this type of relationship as a “valid” marriage as within:

http://www.va.gov/vetapp10/Files2/1018711.txt

In this BVA decision, the spouse, as common law wife of the veteran, was granted

recognized status as surviving spouse of the veteran:

http://www.va.gov/vetapp95/files2/9509716.TXT

She got over that hurdle at the BVA but this case does not reflect whether her DIC claim was successful as it only involved her legal status as a survivor, for VA purposes, that had to be established before any determination on DIC could be made.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

x

x

x

No "common law' in California.

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

None in Florida. If you are living with someone for more than a year or two, or have kids by them it is wise to get married if you care about them and if it is possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use