Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Announces Policy Changes To Allow Emergency Care At Non-Va Facilities

Rate this question


Tbird

Question

  • Founder

VA announces policy changes to allow emergency care at non-VA facilities http://ow.ly/8s4Dv

VA Webpage on Non VA Care http://www.nonvacare.va.gov/

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

x

x

x

Getting them to actually PAY is hard work.

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The VA may assume responsibility, but how long does it take them to pay? I have heard of cases where the vet went to public ER for sc treatment and it took so long for VA to pay that hospital sent the bill to collection messing up the vets credit history. The vet continued to be billed. I heard it was suppose to be illegal to bill a vet for sc treatment. Don't know if that's correct or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

Thanks for the "heads up" T bird.

Interestingly, the VA seemed to always have had that policy. About 3 years ago, when I thought I may be having a heart attack, my wife called the VA to let them know I was coming.

They said they are "diverting patients" because the local VAMC was "full". They also said to go to another facility, and the VA would pay.

I went to another hospital and the VA did pay, without a mis step.

This does not seem to be a "new" policy but maybe more money is going in that direction to pay for the "old" policy that was inconsistently enforced, as I have heard of many getting a much worse result than the one I had.

I am frankly suspicious of the VA's motives in announcing this "policy change?"...especially this close to elections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

JON - You are correct, the VA generally takes too long to pay, which can screw up the vets credit rating. The VA is not supposed to bill for SC treatment but that's never stopped them before. It does happen.

pr

The VA may assume responsibility, but how long does it take them to pay? I have heard of cases where the vet went to public ER for sc treatment and it took so long for VA to pay that hospital sent the bill to collection messing up the vets credit history. The vet continued to be billed. I heard it was suppose to be illegal to bill a vet for sc treatment. Don't know if that's correct or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

"Getting them to actually PAY is hard work"

I believe it's worse than that! As far as I can tell, the long standing restrictions are still in place, and will continue to be until Congress makes significant changes in the laws.

Any insurance (private, group, medicare) pays first, and may leave the veteran with deductibles and co-pay due in the event of urgent or emergency care, VA payments or not.

At least Medicare does impose some limits on hospital charges.

The VA's definition of reasonable and prompt access to VA facilities and "qualified" and competent help may be quite different that that of the overall medical community.

The last time I got involved with this, The local VA clinic PCP was running late, the waiting room was full of scheduled appointments, and I was told that it might be up to several hours before a referral to local medical facilities or the VAMC might be made after the VA PCP had a look. This involved an infection that was spreading, and had the potential to penetrate into the brain or cardiovascular system. Had I waited, there was a strong possibility that effective/proper treatment would not be available until the next day.

I ended up seeing my private PCP, and then a full blown oral surgeon recommended by my cardiologist. The surgeon took one look, drained a pocket of infection, and then pulled two teeth, It turned out that a tooth had abscessed, (with no localized pain, of all things), and the infection had traveled well into the facial and sinus areas. The VAMC has one dentist, who is not qualified as an oral surgeon. The VAMC dental department was called, and refused authorization. Since my wife's insurance also covered dental, even with authorization and VA payment, I still would have paid the same deductible and co-pay that I paid.

In my area, I'd have to drive to the VAMC about 50-60 miles away, be told that they don't have the capability (lack of specialists, etc., and necessary drugs) be transferred back to a regional medical center about 20 miles in another direction (50-60 back plus 20) , and then be stuck with the same expenses as if I went to the regional center in the first place, assuming I survived the delay. Forget VAMC approval by phone, as either no one is "authorized" or those authorized are "unavailable" during the usual inconvenient times that emergencies occur. Even after "authorization", the VAMC may still refuse to pay. Post emergency approval is almost unheard of without a major hassle, the last thing a veteran with a serious medical condition, or for that matter, the veterans family needs to be involved in.

To me, access to true emergency or acute care is governed by the "golden time", usually one hour or less for the kinds of life threatening events that I might expect to experience as a result of service connected conditions.

For example, a VA emergency room in a VAMC that doesn't even have an interventional cardiologist on staff, or emergency open heart surgery capability is not a facility of choice. All they might be able to do is use "TCB" if they have it, and are qualified to even use it. The capability I mentioned is partially available at my local community hospital, in that "interventional emergency treatment" by a cardiologist, followed by transfer to the regional center is possible.

The VAMC involved will not usually preapprove expenses, and follow through with reasonably prompt payment, unless a veteran is destitute, and carries the "fee paid" card, or politicians and the news media get involved.

x

x

x

Getting them to actually PAY is hard work.

Edited by Chuck75
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the "heads up" T bird.

Interestingly, the VA seemed to always have had that policy. About 3 years ago, when I thought I may be having a heart attack, my wife called the VA to let them know I was coming.

They said they are "diverting patients" because the local VAMC was "full". They also said to go to another facility, and the VA would pay.

I went to another hospital and the VA did pay, without a mis step.

This does not seem to be a "new" policy but maybe more money is going in that direction to pay for the "old" policy that was inconsistently enforced, as I have heard of many getting a much worse result than the one I had.

I am frankly suspicious of the VA's motives in announcing this "policy change?"...especially this close to elections.

This program use to be called the Millineum Project for 2000. I've had to use it twice,once for heart attack w/surgery and another time for a diabetic shock attack. As long as the hospitals bill the VA first then bill Medicare all is well and they will get paid in about 6 months. Tell them that up front to protect your credit. If hospital bills medicare first, then copays are required and your stuck with a bill.They kept this program very hush hush in order to save money.I was beginning to think the program had gotten cut or deleted. So it was nice to see it being brought out of the darkness. But silly me,it's ELECTION time and all things lost are found again(for awhile).The Dallas billing center is the one you contact if they pay slower than usual.The Denver and Atlanta Billing centers will only slow down the payment process.So contact the Dallas one and all will be fine.Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use