Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

$389,475 - In Retroactive Department Of Veterans Affairs Benefits

Rate this question


carlie

Question

"CLINTON — For a 66-year-old Vietnam veteran, the check he received Saturday was a long-overdue thank-you for his military service,

He received $389,475 in retroactive Department of Veterans Affairs benefits, Anderson County Veterans Service Officer Leon G. Jaquet said.

Jaquet told county commissioners about the incident Tuesday during his update on benefits local veterans have received."

Full article:

http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2012/jan/17/anderson-county-veteran-gets-back-payment-for/

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

To the best of my knowledge, anyone can write the VA, SSA, etc., and request, under the FOIA, how much we are being paid by them and they must release that info. We have the right to know where our money is being spent. So, if you want to know how much your neighbor is getting from the government, all you need do is ask. This goes for food stamps, welfare, medicaid, etc, etc, etc..

pr

I think it's great he finaly received his claimed award, but is it really a good idea to publish his name, dollar amount, etc??? Is our names and rates of disability free for public release??? I'd just worry for his safety. People come out of the woodwork when things like this are published.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just,

This was for a news article so I'm sure they had him sign off to list his

personal info in the article.

This is not general info for the public unless for some reason such as this,

we allow it to be.

Maybe we should write him a letter saying we need some financial help because

our mama's - aunt's - cousin's - sister, needs an emergency kidney transplant : -)

No doubt! Could use a little help getting my bathroom fixed!

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I read about a WWII vet who fought in France and Germany. He suffered severe cold weather injuries. He put in a claim back in 1946 I think. He was denied because his records were lost. He suffered for over 60 years. Finally at age 93 he was granted benefits. I don't think the benefits were retro, however. This is the way the VA and DOD treat the "Greatest Generation". Think about how they treat us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

PR

Probably not. There is an awkward "balance" between privacy laws and FOIA. RO decisions are not public. While BVA decisions are public, I can tell an attorney my "case number" and he can look it up..its not searchable on my name. Notice BVA decisions that are public use the term "the Veteran" and do not include name and SSN. This is mostly for attorneys to research case law.

I dont think the VA would disclose another Vets retro, medical history, or any thing else. When you calil the 800 number they do a verification, usually by asking the dates and branch of service. Ditto for IRIS.

This Veteran likely allowed his retro amount to be published...whether or not this was a good idea probably remains to be seen. He may regret allowing this to be published already.

According to the VBM, some CAVC cases are NOT made public. I dont know who decides whether they are public or not, I am speculating if there are "sensitive issues" such as MST, they dont publish the CAVC case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

VSO's should push VA to pay interest on these awards. The poor vet waits maybe 15 or 20 years for an award suffering all the while and gets nothing but what he should have gotten in the first place. The VA has every motivation to delay these awards forever. Does the VA charge interest if they find that you owe them money rare as that is? The VA hounded me for $200 back in the 1970's like you would not believe. They made a mistake in my G.I. Bill. I beat the payback, but it was an ordeal and I was dirt poor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use