Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Bva Denied My Smc For 100% + 60% "s" Award . . .

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

In 2010 they added the additional disabilities, which total 60%, using simple addition. We should not discuss simple addition vs the combined ratings table in my case, as the court needs to decide that issue and I am headed there.

Much of their reasons and bases are false. I've had a pin in my knee since 1971 (after a suicide attempt - m/c vs auto) and haven't had a "normal gait" since 1971 and about 12 yrs ago was told I need a knee replacement. My gait these days is akin to Walter Brennan, in the TV show he had yrs ago. As for walking I doubt I could do 200 yds, w/o much pain and resting every 30-40 yds. I don't fly!!! I have a severe fear of crashing, so I don't. Probably relates to my having to jump outta my first plane rides (yup, Airborne, all the way) Duh!!!!

pr,

Since the theory for SMC/S in this topic, is the additional 60 percent - (added individually / separately,versus combined),

my question for now is,

when the VBA "added the additional disabilities" in 2010 - did they adjudicate any effective dates

for these "additional disabilities" ?

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder

Carla, yes, they did but they didn't "add" up to 60% until July, 2010 and they never sent me an award notice on 3 of them, when they awarded them.

pr

pr,

Since the theory for SMC/S in this topic, is the additional 60 percent - (added individually / separately,versus combined),

my question for now is,

when the VBA "added the additional disabilities" in 2010 - did they adjudicate any effective dates

for these "additional disabilities" ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Date: November 25, 2005 VAOPGCPREC 5-2005

From: General Counsel (022)

Subj: Eligibility for a "Temporary" Total Disability Rating Based on Individual Unemployability—38 C.F.R. § 4.16(b)

To: Chairman, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (01)

QUESTION PRESENTED:

May the Department of Veterans Affairs award a total disability rating based on "temporary" individual unemployability

under 38 C.F.R. § 4.16(b)?

HELD:

Section 4.16 of title 38, Code of Federal Regulations, authorizes the Department of Veterans Affairs to assign a total rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU rating) based upon a veteran’s temporary (i.e., non-permanent) inability to follow a substantially gainful occupation. However, not every period of inability to work will establish an inability to follow a substantially gainful occupation warranting a TDIU rating, because it may be possible to secure and retain employment and to earn significant income despite occasional periods of incapacity. VA must make determinations regarding ability or inability to follow a substantially gainful occupation on a case-by-case basis, taking into account such factors as the frequency and duration of periods of incapacity or time lost from work due to disability, the veteran’s employment history and current employment status, and the veteran’s annual income from employment, if any.

Thanks for that piece of information. I left my volunteer DAV SO position in August 2005 and this is First time I have heard of such a ruling. I notice it is from the General counsel, ie; a va lawyer... wasn't it also a general counsel that wrote the rule stating those with TDIU were not eligible for SMC S? So what we have is one lawyers opinion....correct? I think the va would be hard pressed to defend such a decision in a court since temporary TDIU ratings were not what the congress had in mind. However, I doubt any veteran would actually challenge it just because most would be happy just to get the compensation that comes with the award.

I still think the VA would be wrong to issue a TDIU rating without making it P/T. The very nature of TDIU is for those who cannot work, if someone may be able to return to work they should receive a temporary 100% ratings such as those used after surgery and during recovery periods. I don't understand why a va counsel would make such a determination. But as I have often said, my single opinion (to most people) holds little weight , if any at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Thanks for that piece of information. I left my volunteer DAV SO position in August 2005 and this is First time I have heard of such a ruling. I notice it is from the General counsel, ie; a va lawyer... wasn't it also a general counsel that wrote the rule stating those with TDIU were not eligible for SMC S? So what we have is one lawyers opinion....correct? I think the va would be hard pressed to defend such a decision in a court since temporary TDIU ratings were not what the congress had in mind. However, I doubt any veteran would actually challenge it just because most would be happy just to get the compensation that comes with the award.

I still think the VA would be wrong to issue a TDIU rating without making it P/T. The very nature of TDIU is for those who cannot work, if someone may be able to return to work they should receive a temporary 100% ratings such as those used after surgery and during recovery periods. I don't understand why a va counsel would make such a determination. But as I have often said, my single opinion (to most people) holds little weight , if any at all.

The GC Op was written in 2005. The Issue of TDIU P&T ratings and higher SMC awards was decided in Bradley v.Peake, 22 Vet.App. 280 (2008).

Edited by Wings

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I am 100% TDIU (70%, 30%) pluse 60% IHD, plus 20% risiduals Prostate Cancer and get the SMC "S" Award plus SMC "K"....so after fifty something posts is the question do they also award the SMC "S" for combination that adds up to 60%? Not being a smart ass, just trying to get back to understanding what's going on..and the answer should be they are suppose to take either one 60% or a combination that adds up to 60%..Is that correct?

Edited by evandc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

evandc - as it stands now, the VA "usually" uses the combined ratings table when adding up the additional 60%.

pr

I am 100% TDIU (70%, 30%) pluse 60% IHD, plus 20% risiduals Prostate Cancer and get the SMC "S" Award plus SMC "K"....so after fifty something posts is the question do they also award the SMC "S" for combination that adds up to 60%? Not being a smart ass, just trying to get back to understanding what's going on..and the answer should be they are suppose to take either one 60% or a combination that adds up to 60%..Is that correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use