Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ao Ihd Question

Rate this question


AFButch

Question

Just curious if anyone made it through the claim process without going to one of "their" doctors? My claim is 5 months old and is now in Notification Phase. I did submit much medical supporting docs with the claim. My doc did the IHD questionaire. But, no doctor appt was assigned. Today the 800 number told me that although once in the Notification Phase mine will take a little longer than the usual 5 days because they have to look at everything again and make sure their work is correct. I had listed things on the claim that I THOUGHT was just part of the IHD... heart attack, bypass, continued chest pains, etc.... all that has to be re-reviewed. Just wondering why no doctor appt by the VA?????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

It is possibly that the Questionnaire your doctor filed out aong with the medical reports you submitted ,was enough to decide the claim without a VA C & P.

As long as you are an incountry "Boots on ground" veteran, I would be cautiously optimistic.

The last call I made to the VA 800 number (widows cant use ebeneits) was in late December and the 800 rep said there had been a decision made but they had to recheck everything again,"to dot the I's and Ts" like they told you.

The award letter came a few weeks later.

My past experience is once they deny, they don't recheck anything.

I sure hope you can expect an award.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that they will set you appointment. Everything I file for they had a doctor exam at one the VA hospital. They will look at you and check blood pressure and say thank you.

They might for IHD is do a stress test, or maybe not.

I would put the pressure on the 1-800(nicely)

You should have no problem with your claim, except Time, and VA very, very slow. It took my first time once filed, 7 month until they called me for test. Then it was 2 more month's when I got my claim for IHD

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@SP4RVN1971 Just curious, my claim is in NOTIFICATION Phase following the Decision. I have spoke to the 800 number who confirmed that it went there 2/28/2012. Would a claim go that far before they decide to send you to a doctor? Not sure I can do a stress test right now because I have known blockages but would "clear" it with my Cardiologist if I get a letter telling me to go to a medical appt. That would be the pits, wait all this time just to have to go to P&T especially when they have reached a decision. The 800 number DID explain it is in the final reviewing process so I am sure that could pop up as a need. I have read where they do not always have a P&T under these new AO presumptives, so I will hope for the best and just have to wait for the rest. I could see where they would want want to establish a rating, tho. The condition itself is well documented and they have all that. IF it comes back even at 60% I will likely appeal it IF I do not get the unable to work 40%. Like I have a choice in the matter, anyway, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did your doctor use the VA forms in his report? The va now has their Dx sheets online for non-va doctors to use. if they follow them and you do the 21-4142 you should be okay.

this link is for Heart Conditions (Including Ischemic and Non-Ischemic Heart Disease, Arrhythmias, Valvular Disease and Cardiac Surgery) Disability Benefits QuestionnaireHeart Conditions (Including Ischemic and Non-Ischemic Heart Disease, Arrhythmias, Valvular Disease and Cardiac Surgery) Disability Benefits Questionnaire

http://www.vba.va.gov/pubs/forms/VBA-21-0960A-4-ARE.pdf

James A. Bunker

Executive Director

National Gulf War Resource Center

Phone: 785-925-9887

Email: Do not post your email address.

Join us on Facebook

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The C&P business for IHD can get a bit wierd!

I had ample evidence in my VA and private medical records.

The VARO tried to schedule a "stress test" anyway. The treating cardiologist and the VA's own guidelines stated that a stress test was not advisable.

When I gave the VA contracting cardiologist that was supposed to do the stress test a copy of my cardiologists report, the stress test was canceled.

Before the stress test was scheduled, A VA C&P examiner doing a C&P for DMII, stated in the exam report that no further C&Ps should be scheduled,

based upon the existing medical records, along with comments that additional C&P's for any A/O "presumptive conditions" are unnecessary.

The Nehmer review said that the C&P's that were done were incomplete, and not needed anyway, due to the definitive medical records.

Go Figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The C&P business for IHD can get a bit wierd!

I had ample evidence in my VA and private medical records.

The VARO tried to schedule a "stress test" anyway. The treating cardiologist and the VA's own guidelines stated that a stress test was not advisable.

When I gave the VA contracting cardiologist that was supposed to do the stress test a copy of my cardiologists report, the stress test was canceled.

Before the stress test was scheduled, A VA C&P examiner doing a C&P for DMII, stated in the exam report that no further C&Ps should be scheduled,

based upon the existing medical records, along with comments that additional C&P's for any A/O "presumptive conditions" are unnecessary.

The Nehmer review said that the C&P's that were done were incomplete, and not needed anyway, due to the definitive medical records.

Go Figure.

You should not have problems with this! I had just had two stent's and got 10%. If you were on the ground in Vietnam or some of the other place A/O was used.

What their problem! They away got to have their Head's up their Butt!

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use