Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dro Ptsd Claims Review Hearing.

Rate this question


JamesPT

Question

Hello everyone. Two years ago March 2010 I was awarded a lowball rating for PTSD. I submitted an NOD letter for a review of discrepancies, innacuracies etc observed in their "Reasons for Decision". I requested a review for a higher rating. When I filed for a review I had for several months been seeing and getting counseling\treatment from a private sector Psychiatrist who wrote a very good Nexus letter stating symptoms and gravity of mental condition. I had to seek help from a private sector Psychiatrist because shrinks at the VA do not write support statements for Veterans. This was made very clear to me when I requested a support statement from my VA Psychiatrist, all it took was one word from her "NO!". The frustrating issue is that for the past 5 years I have been under therapy from a VA Social Worker, the Psychiatrist just manages my meds. As I read under "Reasons for Decision" it is apparent that the Social Worker has downplayed the severity of my condition; I imagine when the VA letter refers to "The Examiner" they are referring to the Social Worker. Well, the Nexus letter from the Psychiatrist and his diagnosis for more accurate PTSD condition was very minimally taken as evidence and consideration; they used the VA examiners (The Social Worker I presume) innacurate reports in my opinion as evidence for the lowball rating. I got into a tissy fit with the Social Worker last year, now I am just seeing the VA shrink for meds management. Just yesterday I received a call from VA Regional, they are going to schedule me for a DRO hearing regarding the issues. Does the Nexus letter still carry any weight to make a difference for a fair rating? Criminy, what is bothersome about the claims process, therapy sessions, meetings with Doctors etc; does a Vet have show up for these, unshaven, dirty, disheveled. Seems to me, if you comb your hair, have a clean shirt and pants they may just opine one does not suffer from PTSD condition?. Any suggestions in how to prepare for the DRO hearing would be greatly welcome and appreciated. Thanks.

Jim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone. Two years ago March 2010 I was awarded a lowball rating for PTSD.

Does the Nexus letter still carry any weight to make a difference for a fair rating?

Jim

Jim,

Since you are already SC'd for PTSD - a nexus letter is no longer relevant

as it only used to support a connection of active duty to claimed disability.

To get an increase you need to meet the criteria (with medical evidence)

for a higher evaluation. Your prior rating decision should state what is needed

for a higher evaluation.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello and thanks for your reply. As you mention in your reply, I am SC'd for PTSD and as you indicate:

"To get an increase you need to meet the criteria (with medical evidence)

for a higher evaluation. Your prior rating decision should state what is needed

for a higher evaluation".

My dilemma is that the Nexus letter I submitted meets the criteria needed for a higher rating, the medical evidence\diagnosis is throughly explained in my Psychiatrist's Nexus letter. The Nexus letter does state what is needed for a higher evaluation. The criteria in the Nexus letter was ignored, their decision was made according to the VA examiner's report. When reviewing the Nexus letter and the Examiner's report the latter report which was used for their lowball decision does not reflect an accurate true diagnosis of my condition. I just don't know how a Psychiatrists diagnosis stacks up to a Social Worker's diagnostic report. I would tend to think a Psychiatrist's medical expertise would outweigh a Social Worker's degree of understanding of the so very complicated PTSD mental condition. I had a similar situation happen in regards to my service connected injuries. The last C&P exam was performed by a Physicians Assistant who was, that particular day substituting for the Phycisian who was off for the week, when he submitted his report it was grossely diagnostically innaccurate; I obtained a copy of his report, presented it to the 3 orthopedic surgeons who have treated me for such injuries for the past 6 years; they wrote 3 Nexus letters indicating the innacuracies and wrong diagnosis of injuries. I have had two surgeries with another one pending later this year. It has been written\documented by Mental Health Doctors that my physical injuries are a major stressor that adversely adds stress to my PTSD condition; the reminder of how these injuries occurred in combat operations, the chronic pain, the surgeries and more pending; and yet nowhere in their "Reasons for Decision" reports do they make mention of the stressor\service connected injuries, (My private sector Psychiatrist brings all of it to their attention in his Nexus letter), I have discussed the issue with the VA therapist numerous times but for whatever reason the've ignored to make comment and the point that these injuries add tremendous stress to mental condition. Regarding my PTSD DRO hearing coming up, anybody have suggestions opinions in how to approach and get ready for the hearing? as I mention, the criteria required was explained in the Nexus letter; unfortunately they disregarded the criteria and used the VA examiners misconstrued reports. Thanks, your help is much appreciated. Just trying to find an angle for the DRO hearing.

Jim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use