Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Full Dental C&p Jan 9, 2012

Rate this question


Maurice

Question

I was not told by the DCVAMC that I was having a Full Dental C and P exam in Jan.12. I told that I was to have a TMJ C and P exam. I received a copy of the Exam and wrote to the Baltimore VARO that the Dental provider didn't asked me any questions why I had so many silver fillings and missing teeth. I Inform the VARO that the Base Mess Hall serve me boneless steak that had bones in the meat. I crack all the teeth in my mouth and receive treatment at the Base Dental Clinic.. This was a important issue that would have cause my rating to be rated 0%.....Veterans always request a copy of the C & P exam after the exam from the Medical Record Department. Read the report. If the Doctor missed something. Write the VARO to correct your exam if need to......Good Luck to all my Disable Veterans Friends. I wonder what my rating will be now?

Edited by Maurice

DAV IU 100%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

Hi Maurice,

I am service connected for TMJ that was caused by botched oral surgery. The TMJ C&P exam is actually a Dental C&P exam. I have included links to the C&P exam worksheet and rating criteria for dental. Compare it against your exam notes to see if everything matches up.

Dental C&P Exam Worksheet

http://www.vba.va.go...ms/disexm12.pdf

4.150 Schedule of ratings—dental and oral conditions

http://edocket.acces.../38cfr4.150.htm

I copied/pasted the details below. I am rated under 9905, but every situation is unique.

[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 38, Volume 1]

[Revised as of July 1, 2008]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 38CFR4.150]

[Page 451]

TITLE 38--PENSIONS, BONUSES, AND VETERANS' RELIEF

CHAPTER I--DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

PART 4_SCHEDULE FOR RATING DISABILITIES--Table of Contents

Subpart B_Disability Ratings

Sec. 4.150 Schedule of ratings--dental and oral conditions.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rating

------------------------------------------------------------------------

9900 Maxilla or mandible, chronic osteomyelitis or

osteoradionecrosis of:

Rate as osteomyelitis, chronic under diagnostic code 5000...

9901 Mandible, loss of, complete, between angles................ 100

9902 Mandible, loss of approximately one-half:

Involving temporomandibular articulation.................... 50

Not involving temporomandibular articulation................ 30

9903 Mandible, nonunion of:

Severe...................................................... 30

Moderate.................................................... 10

Note--Dependent upon degree of motion and relative loss of

masticatory function.......................................

9904 Mandible, malunion of:

Severe displacement......................................... 20

Moderate displacement....................................... 10

Slight displacement......................................... 0

Note--Dependent upon degree of motion and relative loss of

masticatory function.......................................

9905 Temporomandibular articulation, limited motion of:

Inter-incisal range:

0 to 10 mm.............................................. 40

11 to 20 mm............................................. 30

21 to 30 mm............................................. 20

31 to 40 mm............................................. 10

Range of lateral excursion:

0 to 4 mm............................................... 10

Note--Ratings for limited inter-incisal movement shall not

be combined with ratings for limited lateral excursion.....

9906 Ramus, loss of whole or part of:

Involving loss of temporomandibular articulation

Bilateral............................................... 50

Unilateral.............................................. 30

Not involving loss of temporomandibular articulation

Bilateral............................................... 30

Unilateral.............................................. 20

9907 Ramus, loss of less than one-half the substance of, not

involving loss of continuity:

Bilateral................................................... 20

Unilateral.................................................. 10

9908 Condyloid process, loss of, one or both sides.............. 30

9909 Coronoid process, loss of:

Bilateral................................................... 20

Unilateral.................................................. 10

9911 Hard palate, loss of half or more:

Not replaceable by prosthesis............................... 30

Replaceable by prosthesis................................... 10

9912 Hard palate, loss of less than half of:

Not replaceable by prosthesis............................... 20

Replaceable by prosthesis................................... 0

9913 Teeth, loss of, due to loss of substance of body of maxilla

or mandible without loss of continuity:

Where the lost masticatory surface cannot be restored by

suitable prosthesis:

Loss of all teeth....................................... 40

Loss of all upper teeth................................. 30

Loss of all lower teeth................................. 30

All upper and lower posterior teeth missing............. 20

All upper and lower anterior teeth missing.............. 20

All upper anterior teeth missing........................ 10

All lower anterior teeth missing........................ 10

All upper and lower teeth on one side missing........... 10

Where the loss of masticatory surface can be restored by 0

suitable prosthesis........................................

Note--These ratings apply only to bone loss through trauma

or disease such as osteomyelitis, and not to the loss of

the alveolar process as a result of periodontal disease,

since such loss is not considered disabling................

9914 Maxilla, loss of more than half:

Not replaceable by prosthesis............................... 100

Replaceable by prosthesis................................... 50

9915 Maxilla, loss of half or less:

Loss of 25 to 50 percent:

Not replaceable by prosthesis........................... 40

Replaceable by prosthesis............................... 30

Loss of less than 25 percent:

Not replaceable by prosthesis........................... 20

Replaceable by prosthesis............................... 0

9916 Maxilla, malunion or nonunion of:

Severe displacement......................................... 30

Moderate displacement....................................... 10

Slight displacement......................................... 0

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[59 FR 2530, Jan. 18, 1994]

Edited by Vync

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Missed, decayed teeth, are not considered disabling for compensation purposes. There are two DBQs for the 9900 aka dental rating series. One is for TMJ. The other is for Dental/Oral Conditions, which covers the conditions above. You were not asked about teeth or fillings because they are not disabling or compensable. Breaking a tooth by biting on something does not qualify as service trauma.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use