Is A Dro Decision And Appeal Decision.

[Mr cue]

i ask this because bva has made and error on my cue claim.

if i never had did the cue of my first rating from services 1993. i would have never been told my claim were still in appeal status since than. i did the cue 2008.

made it to bva told ro never cretify my appeal to the board in 1993.and they are still pending and there has never been and appeal decision made on these claims.

i do have a problem tho

during these pending appeals the dro granted 60% and iu effective the dated i put in papers 2001 and in bold letter say this is a full granted of all current appeal issues.

so i ask is this not a appeal decision that was made by the dro.

i have been fighting 3 yrs with bva to look at there decision. they granted me 10% from 1993-2001 and call the decision 2001 and ro decision which cant make any pending appeal final.

they got many games they play with veteran they even remand and informal iu claim found in the record during the cue to be develop from 1993-2001. i was granted iu 2001 by the dro isnt this a effective dated issue.

it been at amc for 3 yrs just got denied i dont meet the % for iu from 1993-2001. by them granted me 10% from 1993-2001 they knew i would get denied. if they had granted the 60% i would have meet the percent for iu.

folder now back at bva lets see if they straight there error out. bet they make the va courts make a decision on this hope i die before its granted.

but iam 43 and god willing i hope i out last them.

[Berta]

I am glad it went back to the BVA because in my opinion the AMC is utterly useless for many if not most claimants.

I told NVLSP a few weeks ago when one of their lawyers mentioned AMC to me that they seem determined to ignore all evidence and send it off to other ROs that they know will do that too.It is just a stall tactics in my opinion because they dont take the time to even be able to make a proper decision on the claim.

[john999]

If you have evidence you can't work due solely to SC condition it does not matter about your percentage. I am in sort of the same boat percentage wise with a CUE on a 10% award that is headed back to the Court of Vet Appeals after second trip to the BVA. My CUE is 9 years old at least. The BVA said I was not totally disabled because I was not on SSD prior to 2001. I was 100% in 1971. This is what they choak on therefore the grant of 10%. To my mind the BVA can be just as bad as the VARO when they don't want to pay out a large sum of retro. I do think they are just trying to run out the clock on me.

John

[Mr cue]

the crazy thing is the comp exam doc stated i could not work 1993-2001 the one they remand it for.

amc send my claim to comp and pension. all they stated was the evidence doesnt show i cant do sendtry work. denied

now back at bva. i have not work since services 1993 and bva remaned it for a doc opinion which stated i could not work from 1993-2001. and all my limitions.

what there next move its with the judge since feb 21

[Mr cue]

oh for got to say they remanded the iu. but granted 10% no more on the neck issue.when i was granted 60% 2001.

this is with the courts and with the judge and he can look at the iu because it a effective dated issues. not to be developed.

i say this because bva hope that i would not had appeal the decision in time to court. think i had to wait for the remand to come back to appeal. then i would not had been able to appeal the 10% the time would have run out. it was granted 3yrs ago.

see there tricks

[john999]

Yulooking

They just don't want to pay 100% benefits from 1993 so they seek to impeach their own doctor's opinion.

[Mr cue]

ok bva granted my iu cases . but part of it is with the court i have a strong cases to get 70% from 1993-2001. i am 40% 1993-2001 with iu.

i could withdraw my cases but want the court to make this decision i believe i have a cases that will set percented cant spell u get it.

see the va has take a dro decision appeal decision and call them ro decision because the dro is in the local ro not dc. there decision are not appeal decision which means if you have a pending appeal found during a cue and the dro later granted it. it would still be open and bva has to make the appeal decision. to make the pending appeal final.

hope i explain that right. so iam asking would you withdraw the appeal that at the courts.