Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Cavc Desision Number

Rate this question


Flatbroke

Question

Berta,

The number on the CAVC decision is 10-1523. My attorney is supposed to call this afternoon and he has said in an email he was ready to take it to a Federal Appeal.

Kilo 4/12 VIET NAM
11/67-11/68 (TET)
HQ 1/10 LeJune
68
C 1/10 LeJune
68-69
HQ Marine Security Guard School
69
Great Lakes Brig - Corrections
11/69 - 3/70
Semper Fi Everything stays the same until it changes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Is this your BVA decision?:

http://www.va.gov/vetapp/wraper_bva.asp?file=/vetapp10/Files1/1003228.txt

I see a different lawyer on this one, but is this also a BVA decision you received?:

http://www.va.gov/vetapp/wraper_bva.asp?file=/vetapp10/Files1/1003388.txt

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta,

I appreciate the help Carlie and Berta for posting the decision and xxxing out pertaniate facts.

Yes I recievd SC for Lower Back in 2007 but only retro till 2004. I am trying to get it back to 1970 because my military medical recoeds plainly states spondiliocis on top of my spina bifida.

The way I read the CAVC decision is that the RO in Chicago made thier deciasion only according to thier xrays and not by my military medical records which they did not have.

With regard to Mr. XXXXX first argument, the 2010 Board determined that his complete

service medical records were not before the RO, but further determined that absent this error there

nevertheless would not ha...

If you read my military exit records then it states why I would be SC for lower back.

My IMO from DR. XXX relates these facts plainly to the RO in St. Louis and that is where I was awarded SC for my back due to my medical records. Along with the fact that Dr. XXX teaches Xray, MRI, and Cscans and how to read them he proved that the VA was wrong and I reecived SC for my back.

Do I have to hire a rocket scientist or the village idoit to explain it to them???

My attorney is eager to go to Federal Court because he is a litagation Attorney and spends alot of time there.

When he gets back from New York next week he is going to study the decision and then call me and file an appeal. Number of days to file?? anyone..

Also in the decision the CAVC states that I recieved a SOCC from the remand that the St. Louis RO recieved and the CAVC is in error. I recieved a letter from the ST. Louis RO saying that they could not find records from Popular Bluff, Chicago, St. Louis and if they did not in thirty days them they would made a decision on what evidence that they had.

I then wrote them a letter and explained to the idi__s that first if they spelled my name correctly that they might get some results. Also if they could not find records from Chicago, St. Louis and Popular Bluff I had copies and would be glad to supply them copies. No word again from the St. Louis Ro and then a letter from the BVA that St. Louis RO was correct and I still have not recieved a SOCC from St. Louis on thier decision that they apperantly supplied to the BVA.

A little lengthy but they still get to me . Thanks for all the help and I will keep all postsed

Kilo 4/12 VIET NAM
11/67-11/68 (TET)
HQ 1/10 LeJune
68
C 1/10 LeJune
68-69
HQ Marine Security Guard School
69
Great Lakes Brig - Corrections
11/69 - 3/70
Semper Fi Everything stays the same until it changes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta,

I'm sorry 20% for back.

Kilo 4/12 VIET NAM
11/67-11/68 (TET)
HQ 1/10 LeJune
68
C 1/10 LeJune
68-69
HQ Marine Security Guard School
69
Great Lakes Brig - Corrections
11/69 - 3/70
Semper Fi Everything stays the same until it changes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I appreciate the help Carlie and Berta for posting the decision and xxxing out pertaniate facts.

Flat,

The BVA and CAVC redact the personal info like name, claim number, DOB and so on,

prior to posting it to the public web sites.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flat,

The BVA and CAVC redact the personal info like name, claim number, DOB and so on,

prior to posting it to the public web sites.

Thanks Carlie

Kilo 4/12 VIET NAM
11/67-11/68 (TET)
HQ 1/10 LeJune
68
C 1/10 LeJune
68-69
HQ Marine Security Guard School
69
Great Lakes Brig - Corrections
11/69 - 3/70
Semper Fi Everything stays the same until it changes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Carla - I believe the BVA redacts BVA cases but the CAVC is public info, so they need not be redacted.

pr

Flat,

The BVA and CAVC redact the personal info like name, claim number, DOB and so on,

prior to posting it to the public web sites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use