Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dental Implants

Rate this question


grent

Question

my question is this once again

what is the final ruling on VA providing dental implants for 100% P and T vets

do they pay fee basis dental implants

just trying to get the final word is it yes or no

thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I heard that if you are on blood thinner, like coumadin, and it makes your gums bleed from brushing etc. you may be able to get into dental as the bleeding may promote as a seconday condition, ( to the reason you are on blood thinner ), tooth decay or gum disease.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard that if you are on blood thinner, like coumadin, and it makes your gums bleed from brushing etc. you may be able to get into dental as the bleeding may promote as a seconday condition, ( to the reason you are on blood thinner ), tooth decay or gum disease.

I doubt that this is possible. most bleeding of the gums is caused from poor hygine......even in my case where I had dry mouth due to lung medications.... I had no bleeding.....and still lost my teeth...and loss of teeth alone is not considered a disability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt that this is possible. most bleeding of the gums is caused from poor hygine......even in my case where I had dry mouth due to lung medications.... I had no bleeding.....and still lost my teeth...and loss of teeth alone is not considered a disability.

If you search for "bleeding gums coumadin" on the Internet, there's plenty of references to this problem like:

http://heart.emedtv....f-warfarin.html and http://www.indiadental.com/gumdisease.html#causes so apparently it's a common

enough side effect of blood thinning / anti-clotting medication like warfarin which over time can lead to secondary ( or

aggravation of existing ) dental problems like periodontitis as bacteria just thrive on that blood.

Edited by militarynurse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you search for "bleeding gums coumadin" on the Internet, there's plenty of references to this problem like:

http://heart.emedtv....f-warfarin.html and http://www.indiadent...ase.html#causes so apparently it's a common

enough side effect of blood thinning / anti-clotting medication like warfarin which over time can lead to secondary ( or

aggravation of existing ) dental problems like periodontitis as bacteria just thrive on that blood.

That may be... but regardless the va does not pay compensation for loss of teeth as it is not considered a disability......

Edited by Teac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CPO is correct about dental not being compensable. My "award letter" for my front teeth admits service connection and allows treatment at any time, but no compensation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That may be... but regardless the va does not pay compensation for loss of teeth as it is not considered a disability......
It's kinda like a 0% rating...no money, however, the VA may offer dental care which is sort of like having dental insurance. I won't ever say it's "free" dental care because we all know what Veterans had to go through to earn their VA benefits and for which some unfortunately sacrificed more than others to get. I like to see all Veterans get dental care. That stated, any 100% rated disabled Vet I've ever run into is physically or mentally or both in a very bad way and in all probability will have a shortened life span. They are no where near adequately compensated for their loss in the service of our country. If their SC'd injuries and diseases were the result of an accident etc. originating in the private sector, their compensation would likely be 3 times or more pittance the VA gives them. However, that's the reality of the world we live in. For reference: http://www.va.gov/vetapp03/Files/0322847.txt and http://38uscode.com/Courts/VetCourt/2006/Byrd_04-1384.pdf Edited by militarynurse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
    • karlduerr earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use