Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

How To Propose A Rating To The Va

Rate this question


justrluk

Question

I'm trying to see if anyone has been successful in their appeal by sending a proposed resolution to the VA. This particular appeal has a claim date of 3/08. All I really want is for the VA to award the original 40% that was reduced to 20% because they said it was a pre-existing condition (it wasn't - there's nothing in my records about the condition until late in my career.)

If I'm not mistaken, Carlie posted a sample of a proposal she had either sent or was going to send stating something like: "In regards to the appeal dated MM/DD/YYYY, I will consider the appeal resolved to my satisfaction if the percentage assigned to (condition) in the decision dated MM/DD/YYYY was restored to the originally assigned percentage as this condition was not pre-existing (see evidence enclosed). I will not pursue this appeal further as I would find the assignment of 40% as originally granted as having fully satisfied this appeal".

Any opinions would be greatly appreciated.

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

That is called lets make a deal.

You can do it but the VA cant.

If you are sure thats what you want and according to the part 4 you deserve than go for it.

I did it 5 years ago and won.

Basser

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basser -

Thanks for the feedback. Does the language sound right? Yes, it's really all I want. They reduced it from the 40% to 20% based on their assumption that it was pre-existing. I just want the original 40%.

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

It sounds like they changed it to aggravation.

They pay only to the extent of the aggravation.

You may want to prove its not pre existing and get an attorney,

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds like they changed it to aggravation.

They pay only to the extent of the aggravation.

You may want to prove its not pre existing and get an attorney,

J

J -

I've written a 21-4138 outlining what I want and my rationale. I've also put together some tabs for the document supporting my rationale. Here's the tricky part: I was on Active Duty from 1984 - 1987. I joined the ANG for a few years, transferred to the AF Reserve and started working as an Air Reserve Technician. I was then brought back on active duty in 2000. They're saying that the condition pre-existed my RETURN to active duty, but made no mention of previous periods of service because my STRs were missing/lost right after my PEB in 2004. My contention is that since I entered in 1984 and the entrance medical exam (I have a copy) didn't mention this condition, then it must have started while on active duty. The grey area is the ANG/Reserve time between the two periods. I have also printed and enclosed a point summary which shows all the time spent in an active status: weekends, TDYs, Annual Tour, etc. I'm banking on the statutory presumption of sound condition when I entered A/D in 1984, and all of this started while on A/D and worsened during the time as a reservist. If you could take a look at the copy (redacted), I'd really appreciate it. If they reverse the decision to reduce to 20% from 40% and I end up with the original 40%, It puts me over 100% schedular. This is a big deal to me.

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just,

On the 4138 you refer to the "rating decision" and I would refer to it as

the" decision that made a reduction in benefits" dated XX/XX/XXXX.

A very small point but I am anal.

I am on holiday and will look at it more this coming weekend.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Carlie. As you are well aware, language is everything...

J - I'm hoping that the proof is in the absence of the condition being mentioned in my initial enlistment docs. I was also commissioned and it's not in that physical either. The problem is the loophole of being a guardsman/reservist for 13 years between active duty periods. Granted, I pulled a lot of duty in that time and have the point summary included to paint that picture, but it could go either way. I'm not trying to be pushy, but this has been in the hopper since 2008 and I'm ready for resolution.

I guess if I'm not successful, I could always file for an increase as I'm on weekly injections of Humira and daily use of Leflunomide and steroids to keep it under control. I can't really function well without the meds. I'm just trying to preserve the date of claim along with a substantial retro if I'm successful.

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use