Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What To Write/submit For Cue Inferred Claim

Rate this question


autumn

Question

Seeking help in what to write to send in claim for CUE/EED due to "inferred claim".

i meet these numbered items from the list in link below:

#4. Informal/Inferred Claims can lead to an EED.

#7. When Vet applies within a year of discharge.

:filed the month i was discharged

#8. Clear, Unmistakable Error can lead to an EED.

:have IMO detailing this

#3.157 visit to the clinic can establish the claim effective date

:true for me, plus i have C&P from that pereiod stating "severe chronic disese..." that VARO ignored.

:evidence from mil med records VARO ignored

:errors from navy PEB ignoring medical evidence

I don't get a response from VSO when i presented this to them so i figure i'll need to file myself.

I don't know what form, and what to write or not write when submitting claim for CUE substantiated by at least the above items i listed. looking for advice on this...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Here is an examle of what I would consider a very good inferred claim for TDIU: A vet is rated 70% for PTSD and is on SSDI for the same condition. The VA has the vet's SSDI records showing the vet can't work. The VA should infer TDIU.

Here is an example where the VA should also infer TDIU: The vet is rated by the VA as 50% for PTSD and the vet is also on SSDI for PTSD and the VA knows it. The VA should infer TDIU

Another example is that a vet is rated 30% for PTSD and requests an increase and has an IMO from a psychiatrist that states the vet is unable to work and that his PTSD has gotten worse in recent months. The vet is currently unemployed. The VA should schedule a C&P exam and also consider TDIU. The VA should not dismiss the TDIU case just because the vet has not met the schedular requirement that they, the VA, made up out of thin air by ignoring 4.16b.

I know the VA has many claims where vets have met 4.16b for many years and the VA has not awarded TDIU. I think this is an error, but a vet will have a hard time proving it unless he/she can show the VA knew the vet was unemployable and yet refused to infer TDIU.

pva recently put in for tdiu and is using my 100% ssdi stuff. va recently raised my percentage to 90% though they are in process of rating two other recent c&p's to see if that will add to the recent 90%. of course, only now is VA looking at ssd and stuff because pva is pushing it.

beats me if pva will/can get an inferred tdiu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Your TDIU claim with 90% and SSDI is pretty much a slam dunk. You might get 100% if your other disabilites add up to 50% on their own. That would give you 95% rounded up to 100%. If you want to go back in time and say the VA should have inferred TDIU when you got SSDI that would depend on other factors including if your claim became final at any time. This is for a CUE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your TDIU claim with 90% and SSDI is pretty much a slam dunk. You might get 100% if your other disabilites add up to 50% on their own. That would give you 95% rounded up to 100%. If you want to go back in time and say the VA should have inferred TDIU when you got SSDI that would depend on other factors including if your claim became final at any time. This is for a CUE.

those words, "...if your claim became final at any time...". i'm a bit fuzzy on that. there were a few "closed claims" in past and as recent as 2010. the 2010 closed without RO taking into consideration MS secondary conditions, which we know is supposed to be a mandate. anyways, PVA resubmitted to open claim for secondary issues, late 2010 dec, i think. the 90% recently was due to MS secondary issues and the two recent C&P's are for spinal injury increase and the MS secondary issue "major depression". beats me how RO will rate those two. i was already SC'd fro major depression, secondary to chronic pain. now since they admit/agree i have this MS stuff, major depression gets lumped into that and has to be re-rated.

don't want to confuse us all, i'm too confused at times as it is. a sentence or two on the "claim becoming final" would be appreciated in simple terms please. thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use