Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Recent 70% Rating & Iu Claim

Rate this question


relpats

Question

USAF retired in 1996 & 15 years later submit VA Claim for issues, 3 of which granted over the next 18 months;

Dermatitis - 60%, Broken toe - 10%, Tinnitus - 10%

Total - 70% (A couple of claims pending)

The award letter contained a VA Form 4107 with many possible eligibilities, one of which stating one may apply for IU. Checked the VA website & it said if rated @ 70% with one at least disability at 40% meets qualification to apply. Applied and a C&P doc that appears to be from India or Pakistan attempts to dismiss me with out examining my red haired, fair skinned dermatitis. After 3 minutes of looking at the computer he makes eye contact and says, "You are here for a skin exam and I don't see any flakes, the exam is over and you can go".

To keep this post short, I ask, "Aren't you going to look at this or at that"? He reluctantly does very little observation as if he doesn't want to touch me. He plops back down in his chair, asks me when was the last time I looked for a job and tells me, 'You can work".

I get a copy of the exam and by his opin I will be reduced from 60% down to 10% for the dermatitis and opined that it is less likely that my condition is service connected. I had two skin C&P's last year before being awarded the 60% in Mar of this year. The dermatitis has been ruled service connected already. My SMR shows diagnosis in 1978 and treatment throughout my 21 year career. Furthermore, my post-service dermatologist prescribes Class 1&2 corticosteroids to combat the disorder. If this foreign doctor is successful, I will cease to receive the CRDP that I just started receiving in April 2012. I am a military retiree and if reduced below 50% receive nothing in essence.

Any advice?

Edited by relpats
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

I am fairly new to all this so I'm just giving my two cents....... if what happened to you, happened to me....I would quickly get at least one IMO (Independent Medical Opinion)and/or and IME (Independent Medical Exam) from a specialist (dermatologist) to refute what this doctor's opinion is concerning the severity of your already service connected dermatitis. I would then send (receipt requested) or take it in person (I would have whoever I hand it to provide proof of receipt) to my RO with a cover letter attached. In the cover letter I would let them know exactly what was done in reference to the VA exam they sent you to and what that doctor said to you and you to him. I would also state somewhere in the cover letter that you are attaching a recently obtained IMO to dispute the VA examiners opinion. Hadit.com has a link that explains what should be included by a physician/specialist when writing an IMO which can be found here: There is also a DBQ (Disability Benefit Questionairres) for dermatitis/skin disorders located here http://benefits.va.g...isabilityexams/ that I would request be filled out by my Dermatogist.

At the very least I would personally send a letter to my RO if I felt I did not receive a proper exam. That's just me....even with the VA I'm of the opinion if no one reports inadequate exams being conducted by a doctor then it is not going to get fixed.

My understanding is before VA reduces your compensation they do send you a letter of their intent and it is possible to appeal the reduction. Some rules for reduction can be found here: I have never seen where a C&P examiner can reduce your compensation - my understanding is that only a rater can actually do this?...unless your referring to what he opinionated on the exam report, when comparing it to the disability rating table for that contention would more closely fit a possible rating of 10% versus your current 60%.

Being the pessimist that I am....I would try to head them off at the pass. Not sure if other more experienced vets would tell you to just wait to see if the VA actually tries to reduce you before worrying about it or getting an IMO/IME. Like I said...this is just my two cents . I can't give any advice in regards to your IU claim - hopefully someone with more experience will post soon.

Welcome to hadit.com and thanks for your service to our country!

Edited by USMC5811

“A nation reveals itself not only by the men it produces, but also by the men it honors, the men it remembers.” - John F. Kennedy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I completely agree with the excellent advice that USMC5811 gave you.

First thing I noted was your retiree status and the CRDP -so it is critical to fight this lousy C & P.

I too believe strongly that many vets should "head them off at the pass" and not accept an exam as biased as this one was.

I have seen claims at the BVA whereby a veteran was award TDIU due to a skin condition so severe that it precluded substantial employment.

The BVA site is broke again but I found this case via google:

“In December 1999, the RO referred the veteran's claim to C&P

Service for consideration of an extra-schedular TDIU.

In July 2000, the Director of VA C&P found, in essence, that

the additional evidence indicated that the veteran was

precluded from employment primarily because of her skin

disorder and concluded that entitlement to an extra-schedular

TDIU was warranted. Thereafter, by rating action in July

2000, the RO implemented the C&P determination and assigned

an effective date for the award of April 11, 1995, the date

of receipt of the veteran's claim for an increased rating. “

http://www.va.gov/vetapp03/Files/0319123.txt

This claim was for an earlier EED.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I read in VBM that a vet whose foot skin condition gave off a bad odor was enough to grant TDIU. The bad smell was a barrior to employment and this was recognized by a VA social worker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

USMC5811,Berta & john999,

Thank you so much for your concerned responses. This is a good website and I know because I posted this same experience on another website asking for guidance. They were picking my post apart and searching for some flaw in my depiction vs trying to help. What a great bunch of men and women you are!!! I will explore all options to combat this examiners condescension.

It is noteworthy to mention that upon retirement a VA briefer told the entire room of retiring veterans not to expect anything from the VA and as a result no one filed any type of claim. Besides, the VA was a debacle that we had somehow eluded: we weren’t maimed and confined to one of their hospitals.

15 years later with a severe eye infection (my good enough to see to drive with eye, the other is too weak) I went to the nearest base and was told that facility was closed to retirees. Next, I went to the VA clinic in town with my retired ID & DD Form 214 (Honorably retired and highly decorated) only to be told that they would not see me because I was not in the system. They actually looked at me with my swollen, red, crusting eye and told me I would have to drive to the VA MedicalCenter 40 miles away to get in the system.

Knowing that I can’t risk losing eyesight in this eye I call a local eye doctor and offer to pay cash to be seen today and can be treated at 4pm. I have enough time to drive to the VAMC before the appointment so I did and was subjected to a means test and by vurture of my military retired pay alone was not eligible for VA treatment.

An endearing VA employee told me to go down the hall and see a certain VA counselor. I did and he gave me some VA forms and encouraged me to fill them out.

Long story short I was assigned a 70% rating and missed out on a quarter of a million dollars in VA compensation over those 15 years because the VA sent a dirtbag to brief it's finest at their retirement briefing. Now to add insult to injury the VA puts a VA Form 21-8764 in the award package suggesting someone at my rating may be eligible for IU (never even heard of this) and to submit a VA Form 21-8940. Now a foreign doctor seeks to unravel the 70% rating just awarded 4 months ago because I filed a IU form at VA suggestion.

This is no way to say thank you to our service men and women!

Edited by relpats
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use