Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Did Not Claim A Cue, But Asked For A Reconcideration?

Rate this question


stillhere

Question

I while back I posted on here about my hearing claim being approved on basically the same evidence the VA has had from my first claim for hearing loss back in 83 that was denied.

I was thinking of filing a cue at that time but instead went with a reconsideration. On ebenefits it is showing the VA is treating my claim as a comp&pin claim. They just sent me a request for any other evidence I might have??

In my letter to them I specifically asked for a reconsideration based on the facts that are in my folder from 1983-to present. I asked them to review my folder and give me an earlier ED based solely on my file.

This request for new eveidence is totally out of what I am trying to do. How would I respond to this request?

Advice them again to read my letter and proceed with their review or send another letter spelling out what I feel in detail the reasons I beleive they have made a mistake on my effective date?

Thanks to all, Stillhere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Hi Berta, And as always thanks for the great advise!

I have been doing some research through my medical records and found that otitus media noted in my records in Vietnam and in my exit exam and also .it was noted in my c&P for my first attempt in 1983. This by itself can cause a hearing loss. This is confusing to me on one level. why the VA did not say anything about this.

I actually just went through a severe bout of otitius and ended up having to have a tube put in my good ear!

should I bring this up to the VA during by reconcideratiom?

Stillhere

And I am Stillhere!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sure would.

The ratings for otitis media are in the VA Schedule of Ratings link here at hadit.

In 1983 did the VA give you a compensable but NSC rating then?

If the rating was comensable ( at 10% or more), and they SC it via the claim you have pending now , you could file a CUE on the 1983 decision,in my opinion.

You might want to check over the diagnostic code they used then and compare with the DC at the end of the Schedule of Ratings to see if it was correct in 1983.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta, In the 1983 ruling all it said was denied service connected.....

Being of a hard head back then and probably suffering from PTSd even back then I said screw them! I went on about my life and dealing with my growing hearing loss and paying for all my own aids and tests trying to find a answer why?

Not until I was at the legion hall one day did another vet tell me while I was filinf\g for diabetes 2 that I should try and reopen my hearing claim. Berta you have to remember back in 83 the denials where flying fast and furious and many of us did not know or just did not appeal. VA even used the hospital care as a scare tatic. I mean many vets said it was horrible and the time. One vet told me if you want to die go to the VA if you want to live don't.

Not until I finally got a copy of my service military medical records did I realize all the information the VA had at their disposal in 83 and yet they still denied me! I wnet through a lot back then and their refusal to help me cost me a whole lot especially with my family and all the cost I had to pay when I did mot have the money too!

Guess I will check out the rating termono;ogy and try find out why it wasn't granted!

Thank you, Stillhere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

A couple of things you may want to consider are the following items: If it is a CUE the criteria is based on the rating schedule in effect at the time of the original decision so check if the regs have changed.

The other issue is is the VA awards HL now, and if they used evidence they had not used but was in the service medical record and was not viewed or ignored you may be able to use 3.156 to get your original award dated back to day 1.

Good Luck.

Basser

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks J for weighing in! That is exactly what I am looking at and again wonder how in hells name they could have missed the diseased ears and not put two and two together! DA

Stillhere

Edited by stillhere
Link to comment
Share on other sites

jbasser is Right on the button there.....and that was superb advise from him.

No VCAA in 1983 and they often said those claims had no merit because they were not 'well grounded'.

VA has come a long way in giving us better rights but I recall in the 1980s claimants were upset at the 20 thousand or more claims that had been in the appeals process.

Not to mention those BVA lawyers who were indicted for hiding claims in old file cabinets down in Washington, just so they didn't have to work on them.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Ronald beecher went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      First Post
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use