Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Well After 2 Years 2 Months A Ssoc Is On Its Way

Rate this question


71M10

Question

Greetings all:

According to eBenefits Detroit VARO has a shinney new SSOC on its way to me. My AB8 letter hasn't changed and I pretty much already know they have turned down one condition based on a copy of the C&P.

Since my benefits letter hasn't changed, I am assuming they did not grant Kyphoscoliosis as a restrictive lung condition (should be 100% alone). The real question is what have they decided on sleep apnea, alone it will not change my overall percentage, but it would make my 90% effective about 2 years earlier!

When I have it, I will scan it in with my game plan, looks like I am headed to the BVA (after they take another 2 years to certify the appeal).

Best regards,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Here is how I did mine. Cervical spine came first. Lung condition secondary but rateable at 100 percent.

I know how you can win your claim.

What injury caused your Spine to bend so bad, Was it an Injury or Neuromuscular disorder? I can remember.

Have you ever thought about using Dr Bash to put this thing to bed for you?

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a long term change to the spine caused by Injury to T8 (when I was 19) and 26 years of arthritis(diagnosed on xray when I was 22). The T8 injury was causing some really bad paravertable muscle spasms (over a 13 year period). I really need to see what they write in the SSOC. They describe the scoliosis and kyphosis in my thoracic spine in two VA ratings decisions (when describing my SC injury) and a third VA decision for cardiomegaly describes that my Left and Right Ventricles are enlarged. I am assuming that they are going to try to say I don't have a diagnosis of "kyphoscoliosis" because they are unable to read the definition of kyphoscoliosis in Dorlands medical dictionary and they also did not read the treatment notes from a treating VA physician (manual medicine-orthopedist) that I specifically directed them to in a statement in support of claim (that they didn't actually read).

I don't know that I really need Dr. Bash, I have a couple of physicians I have been in contact with. If I don't win outright there is enough for a remand. If we end up there I would consider brining in a heavy hitter like Dr. Bash.

It seems a whole lotta time would be saved if someone at the RO would actually read the file before making a decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Your lung condition is caused by the Scoliosis, The right side heart damage with the ventricle enlarged means it has been going on for years. The right ventricle must doesn't blow up over night. Your pulmonary artery pressures must be pretty high.

Has the Doc stated to the VA that the lungs are put into a bind by the scoliosis and it has caused severe pulmonary HTN.?

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well as usual, the VA has me scratching my head on this one. I thought the fact they did a SSOC seemed odd, and it is.

The SSOC I received is for the cervical spine only, nothing about restrictive lung disease, apnea or urinary frequency. They did an original SOC for cervical spine in March of 2011(orig desc 9/2010) and I did not send in a form 9 because I received the 20% that I thought was fair. In October, 2011 they indicated this appeal was closed since no Form 9 was received. Why would they do a SSOC on a final decision???

The system also shows a Decision and Claims Dispatch event on 3/26/2013 associated with the NOD of my Dec 2010 decision (kyphoscoliosis, restrictive lung disease, sleep apnea, urinary frequency). I have not received anything. If they issued a decision that would have to be a full grant of benefits since no SOC is listed/associated with this appeal. PLEASE CORRECT ME IF I AM WRONG.

They also under the C&P claims section in eBenefits, have made an entry for March 26th as a Decision for an Appeal.

My AB8 letter remains unchanged, but the retro involved if this is a full grant is north of 70K, so It may be in promulgation for a while.

Best regards,

Edited by 71M10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would keep my eye on ebenefits letter generator. You usually see a change there before you get a letter. 70k would require 3 signatures...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use