Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Bva

Rate this question


desertstorm

Question

I received a letter from BVA which states the following appeals dated 2009 have been remanded back to St. Petersburg Regional office: increase in rating for fibromyalgia ......currently 20%, increase in rating for IBS.....currently 10%. Also, in March 2013 I received service connection for MDD secondary to fibromyalgia....30% .

I filed a NOD on the MDD rating. I already had the following appeals at BVA level since 2008 and they went before the VLJ on April 2013 PTSD, Migraines and Bronchitis.. Instead of providing a decision on the appeals which were already at BVA level...they have been remanded back to St. Pete regional office along with appeals for increase in rating ....fibromyalgia, IBS and MDD. Wording on BVA paperwork states:Accordingly, the case is REMANDED for the following action: Schedule the veteran for a hearing before a Veterans Law Judge by videoconference at the St. Petersburg Regional Office. My question is why weren't the appeals that were already at BVA level not addressed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

?????

You had appeal at BVA dated 2009,which is on remand.

"remanded back to St. Petersburg Regional office: increase in rating for fibromyalgia" have they rated the fibromyaglia higher since?

Then

"I already had the following appeals at BVA level since 2008 and they went before the VLJ on April 2013 PTSD, Migraines and Bronchitis."

"My question is why weren't the appeals that were already at BVA level not addressed?"

Good question.

Last time I dealt with the BVA and the ombudsman this contact info worked:

  • Have questions about BVA appeals? Contact the Veterans Information Office at 1-800-923-8387.

  • Have corrections to information on your BVA Appeal Status? Contact the BVA Ombudsman at 202-632-4623.

This is the main BVA phone number:
1- 202- 565- 5436

Also this is the email for the BVA ombudsman:

bva.ombudsman@va.gov

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Claim for depression/confusion,chronic headaches, and respiratory condition, and Gulf War Undiagnosed Illness, and NSC was filed on 4/10/2007. Out of ignorance I withdrew NSC claim. September 11, 2007 decision received from St. petersburg, FL RO denied SC for all issues. Formal NOD filed 2/212008 requested a formal hearing before DRO. Filed a claim for PTSD in 5/08/2008 and claim for NSC 6/10/2008. Filed IU claim in 11/3/2008. April 20, 2009 I had DRO hearing. SOC received 5/19/2009 denied all issues. Filed Form 9 dated 5/28/2009 stating I do not want a BVA hearing. Decision rating dated 6/19/2009 granted NSC pension effective date 6/2008. Received SOC 1/16/2013 PTSD prior to 10/30/2009 denied. SOC dated 1/31/2013 Granted SC for depressive disorder(claimed as PTSD) 30% effective date 10/30/2009.

Filed claim for Fibromyalgia,IBS, and depression/confusion(now claimed as major depressive disorder) on 10/29/2009. Received denial letter dated 2/8/2010 stating STR's could not be located. Filed VA form 21-4138 dated 4/7/2010 requesting reconsideration for rating decision. Decision letter dated 8/23/2010 granted SC 20% for Fibro and 10% for IBS. Depressive disorder/confusion (now claimed as MDD) associated with fibro was denied. Form 9 NOD filed on 9/3/2010 requesting increase in rating(s).SOC dated 3/6/2013 denied increase of ratings. Filed VA Form 9 appeal to BVA requesting rating increase for MDD and denial of PTSD. On same Form 9 I appealed denial of increased in ratings for IBS and Fibro.

C-file is back at St. Pete RO received on May 30th 2013, with the following issues on remand:

Entitlement to SC for PTSD

Entitlement to an initial rating higher than 20% for fibro

Entitlement to an initial rating higher than 10% for IBS.

I have been told by VSO that MDD, Migraines and chronic bronchitis are remanded also. I'm not sure why 2008 BVA appeal MDD, migraines, and chronic bronchitis was remanded. Except the BVA decision letter says The matter is before the BVA on appeal of rating decisions in August 2010 and in January 2013 of a Dept. of Veterans affairs RO. The appeal is remanded to the RO via the AMC in Washington, DC. Also,can someone tell me how to find BVA remand decision. I have the docket #. I apologize for the long posting. I've been dealing with these issues for a long time and needed to vent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • sakata earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • alexpainter earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • catyvaz1 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use