Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dro Decision In Our Favor. Is That It?

Rate this question


xray328

Question

My wife had a total knee replacement 9/10. She was awarded 100% for 13 months following the surgery, which was then reduced to 30%, the minimum for a knee replacement. She has pain and weakness in that leg since the surgery to the point she can barely walk up the stairs. We applied for an increase to 60%, which is the rating for weakness and residual pain. This was initially denied because she has to have weakness in her leg to be awarded the 60%...after 18 months of waiting..sigh. So we appealed via DRO, she got notice Friday her rating is now 60% retro to 11/2010.

But it says "This decision represents a partial grant of benefits sought on appeal". Not sure waht that means exactly, we asked for 60% and got it.

Theres also a form that says "Expeditied Processing, Waiver of 30 day Waiting Period, Pelase forward my case to the BVA"

I'm assuming that's just if we disagree with the DRO?'

So are we done?

E-benefits AB8 still says 40%. (30 for knee, 10 for back)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

When they say partial grant they mean anything less than absolute maximum benefit available. If she is unable to work then that means she might be able to claim TDIU or 100%. That would probably be a complete grant but maybe not. She might be able to claim SMC. If you think your wife is more disabled then appeal via BVA. You having nothing to lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See AB v. Derwinski back in 1991 or 92. Any claim is assumed to be for the maximum amount you can attain. By only asking for 60%, you have left something on the table in VA's eyes. Since Buie, TDIU is always for application at a minimum as well as for pain and other incidentals as Jonster has pointed out.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

Congratulations on your progress so far.

I recently also had a successful DRO review and noticed that it took a few days after receiving my award letter for the ebenefits letters to be updated accordingly.

If you have not already, be sure to check your bank account for retro. biggrin.png

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great News!

One good thing about VA decisions.... just about anything can be appealed.

Almost every important appeal I ever filed was on an award letter, that resulted from an initial denial I had appealed.

Awards that,......on the surface seemed OK,

until I really gave them some thought and found the decisions were still wrong.

I wonder if they deferred TDIU for your wife......she will learn more soon on this....

A nice retro check is great but also time to think about putting some of it aside if an IMO might be what it takes to get your wife to the very highest level of SC she should be receiving.

"So are we done?"

I chuckled at that... many of us seem to Never be done.

Every vet has the right to attempt to gain the highest monetary award that they can ,for their sacrifice.

It sure isn't greed.... it is to insure that our Nation pays them it's full debt of gratitude .

(which you all have to fight for... as our first Commander in Chief spins in his grave)

"The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war, no matter how justified, shall be directly proportional to how they perceive the Veterans of earlier wars were treated and appreciated by their nation." George Washington

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use