Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Die, Doma!

Rate this question


Veldrina

Question

Got this in mail today at work....wooot!!!!!! biggrin.png

On June 26, 2013, the Supreme Court ruled that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional. As a result of this decision, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has now extended benefits to employees and annuitants who have legally married a spouse of the same sex.

The attached memo from OPM explains the election options of the benefits that have been extended to same sex marriages as a result of the Supreme Court’s ruling. Additional guidance regarding the benefits covered in the memo and other benefits will be forthcoming soon.

General Guidance from OPM:

  1. June 26, 2013 is considered the date of the Qualifying Life Event (QLE).
  2. All valid marriages will be recognized and coverage under Federal Employee Benefits will be based on the legal marriage, regardless of where the employee resides.
    1. i.e. If an employee was legally married in Minnesota and lives in a state that does not recognize same-sex marriage, then they are entitled to Federal Employee Benefits for their spouse and/or children
  3. Marriage is the only term that is used in the eligibility requirements for Federal Employee Benefits.
  4. HR offices are to follow the procedures already in place for enrolling in or changing benefit elections. Please ensure that you are following the same procedures for both opposite sex and same sex married couples.
  5. i.e. If you currently require marriage certificates in order to change from Self to Self and Family, then the same process should be followed for new enrollments based on the extension of federal benefits to same sex married couples.
  6. OPM is developing a Benefits Administration Letter with additional guidance that will be available soon.

FEHB:

  • When changing from Self to Self and Family due to the addition of a spouse, the effective date is the first day of the first pay period after the election is submitted to Human Resources
  • When changing from Self to Self and Family that includes a child, the effective date of the increase in coverage can be the first day of the first pay period that encompasses June 26, however, the FEHB effective date for Self and Family will be June 26, 2013.
    • This should be treated the same as if a child is born and an employee is changing from Self to Self and Family based on the QLE of the birth.
    • Retroactive premiums may apply
  • FEDVIP:

    • This is not a QLE for employees who are not currently enrolled in FEDVIP. Employees who are not currently enrolled in FEDVIP will have to wait until Open Season to enroll.
    • Current FEDVIP enrollees can increase coverage in order to cover their spouse and/or children
    • Please contact BENEFEDS directly to report newly eligible family members.
    • The effective date of the coverage is the first day of the first pay period after the request is received by BENEFEDS.

    FEGLI:

    • This is a QLE that will provide the employee the opportunity to:
      • If not enrolled, enroll in Basic and Optional Insurances
      • If already enrolled:
        • Increase Option C insurance
        • Automatically cover eligible dependents under Option C enrollment

    FLTCIP:

    • Spouses will have 60 days to apply for the FLTCIP with the abbreviated underwriting
    • FLTCIP is still allowing same-sex domestic partners to be covered under the program.

    FSAFEDS:

    • An employee can either (1) enroll or (2) increase FSA amount based on the June 26, 2013 QLE.
    • If employees are already enrolled, they can immediately begin submitting eligible family member claims for reimbursement.
    • The effective date for new enrollees is the first day of the first pay period after the election is received.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

How can you have marriage without sex? Or sex without marriage? They go together!

When I fell in love with my wife and decided to marry and live the rest of my life with her I then also in the eyes of the church in my vows that I would not forsake another. I have been true in that regard and not strayed. We have raised our family and are now living out our golden years together as man and wife. This is the way the holy father wanted it to be.

Now if being with someone of the same sex is not about sex then what is it about?

Stillhere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well how can you have a marriage without sex............. I know plenty of people who could explain that one to you!!!blink.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Founder

How can you have marriage without sex? Or sex without marriage? They go together!

When I fell in love with my wife and decided to marry and live the rest of my life with her I then also in the eyes of the church in my vows that I would not forsake another. I have been true in that regard and not strayed. We have raised our family and are now living out our golden years together as man and wife. This is the way the holy father wanted it to be.

Now if being with someone of the same sex is not about sex then what is it about?

Stillhere

It's about all the reasons you married, not about what kind of sex you have. Marriage is a life commitment that comes with all the joys, woe's, and the benefits when two people commit to sharing their lives. You and I can disagree about this. I am overjoyed at this news, it is beyond anything I thought I would see in my lifetime. I do hope the VA gets this squared away soon.

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use