Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dr Bash

Rate this question


meghp0405

Question

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator

He quoted me 3000 and that was 4 years ago. IMHO, Dr. Bash is not the best way to go because:

1. He is expensive.

2. Most likely, he will "review" the records but offer no "new" evidence. If a local doc does tests on you, he can interpret these tests and offer "new and material evidence" under 38 cfr 3.156. A doc who just reviews others evidence is not "new" evidence.

3. The VA knows Dr. Bash well. And they take every opportunity to "discount" (that is, deny your claim) his opinion.

Here is an example of the VA "fighting" the opinion of Dr. Bash:

https://efiling.uscourts.cavc.gov/cmecf/servlet/TransportRoom?servlet=ShowDoc/01212259669

Here is another:

https://efiling.uscourts.cavc.gov/cmecf/servlet/TransportRoom?servlet=ShowDoc/01202053599

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a completely different take on what the court stated under # 44 in the Fed Cir opinion as it appeared that Dr Bash challenged the expertise of the examiner and the veteran got a remand.

A remand is always a foot still in the door!

In the POW CAVC case it appeared to me that 2 other doctors concurred with and corroborated with Dr. Bash's opinion.

The widow of this WWII POW got a remand .too.

In the past VA used to get very tough on Dr. Bash.One BVA lawyer derogatorily referred to him as “that radiologist” .in their decision.

I have a copy of a letter somewhere from either former VA Secretary Mansfield or from the Office of General Counsel VA (maybe from both entities) ,to Dr. Bash , apologising for some crap he was getting fonm the VA and thanking him for his help with expert medical opinions on behalf of veterans. forget the actual wording.

Sure he is expensive.

My 2 IMOs cost me 4 thousand bucks. (2005 /2006)

I had already won FTCA and 1151 wrongful death on my lay medical background alone.

My AO DMII claim should not have required an IMO because it was medically sound as it stood.

But I wasnt dealing with OGC and VA Central office top guns legally and medically (who can read) with my DMII AO claim..... I was dealing with a RO who had already put me through the wringer.Many times.

The IMO fee would have been much higher for me,I am quite sure, if I had not laid out the whole medical 9 yards in my cover letter to the medical records and evidence that I sent to Dr. Bash.

It didnt take him long to go over te veteran's medical records, etc, and the scenario documented by the VA that led to the DMII diagnosis ,which VA had never diagnosed in the veteran's lifetime and which, along with their malpractice ,was the cause of his death.

I have to make this point Broncovet and I value all of your comments here , although I strongly disagree with this one.

It is Medical Evidence that awards service connection.

If the medical evidence and/or the nexus factor ,if needed, is NOT there, no IMO doctor can really opine beyond speculation and the VA would disregard that type of IMO.

There are no IMO miracles in the VA claims process.

“Most likely, he will "review" the records but offer no "new" evidence. “

In my IMO and in those of a few vets I know, he found “new conditions” they should claim.

He cant come up with “new” evidence, as it is the established medical record that any doc ,even a VA C & P doc, depends on.

But he sure might find some “old” medical evidence that the VA had completely overlooked.

This is just my opinion after many phone calls, emails, we exchanged and my doing some SVR shows with Dr. Bash,all over the last 8 years ,regarding many veteran's and survivors issues, that had nothing to do with my DMII claim.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Megh, send your vet to him. Let the vet send his records. Bash will review them and quote a price.

If you need help, PM me.

Basser

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

I am not going to dispute what Berta says..she is the best. If you can afford Dr. Bash, by all means go for it. I still think it is quite possible, or even likely, that you can get a "local" doc to do an IMO/IME that will be less expensive than Dr. Bash.

I do think Dr. Bash is highly experienced doing Vets IMO;s and he knows exactly what they want. For example, a doc who is unfamiliar with the VA may write an opinion such as, "The Veterans malady could be due to military service". That is a deal breaker. "Could" in the VA eyes means speculative and automatic denial. You see Doc's often say things like "Take these pills and you "could" get better. This is not pure speculation, or the doc would not prescribe them.

Doc Bash, on the other hand will write the opinion as he knows the VA needs to award. He is very Veteran friendly and will do his best to give a favorable opinion. Most people dont expect to pay Doc Bash $3000 for him to opine your disease was not caused in service.

You need a Veteran friendly doc, and while Doc Bash is Veteran friendly, I think there are other docs who are also Veteran friendly who may charge less.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use