Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Bbe, Nod, Dro

Rate this question


cham1968

Question

10% right hip strain

painful motion of hip higher evaluation not warranted unless there is limitation of abduction

10% left hip strain flexion is limited to 45 degrees or less

10% tinnitus

10% Lumbar Strain

forward flexion greater than 60 but not greater than 85 degrees. combined ROM greater than 120 but not greater than 235 degrees. additional symptoms: painful motion. a higher eval not warranted unless combined ROM not greater than 120 or muscle spasms, abnormal gait (wrong) abnormal contour such as scoliosis, reversed lordosis (wrong), or abnormal kyphosis

0% right wrist

status post scaphoid fracture palmer flexion limited, but not in line with forearm, dorsiflexion limited to 15

0% left wrist

Provisions concerning functional loss due to pain, fatique, weaknesss, or lack of endurance, and flare-ups

have been considered but not warranted. Higher not warranted unless painful motion.

I have been seen by VA medical since 2001 for pain and weakness, documented DJD as early as 1990 Arthritis since that time too in STRs and VA records. surgery on both twice on left in service. HELP!

0% left ankle

Dxd disability with no compensable symptoms. Provisions concerning functional loss due to pain, fatique weaknesss, or lack of endurance, and flare-ups have been considered but not warranted. Higher are not warrented unless painful motion. I don't have much on this injury since service except for my lay statements.

right ankle denied I don't have much on this injury except lay statements

right knee denied Although there is a record of treatment in service for right knee strain, no permanent residual or chronic disability subject to SC was shown by service treatment records. The VA medical opinion found no link, the evidence does not show that you developed arthritis of right knee to a compensable degree within left knee the specified time period. the condition neither occurred in nor was caused by service. Only lay statements

PTSD denied

a review of your STRs records failed to reveal symptoms/diagnosis of PTSD. Your SPR did not reveal the receipt of any combat citations. Your stressor included duties in Somalia witnessing the death of a civilian. Treatment letter from the VA revealed situational insomnia. In May 2011 you were DXd with anxiety disorder. You were treated and dxd with PTSD by LCSW. With review of your claims folder to include STRs from VAMC and the Vet Center the examiner declared you did not meet the full criteria for PTSD. You were dxd with an adjustment disorder with anxiety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

Can someone shed some light on this. I have records of arthritis, DJD on both wrist going back to 1990 in service. I am also documented with abnormal gait and had a nerve conduction test with DXD lower nerve issues. Should this be separate or connected as secondary to lumbar. With the PTSD is it really worth the fight or since they've basically provided me with the anxiety disorder should I run with that and lose the filing date?

Thanks in advance

God Bless and Good luck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use