Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

A Rating Question

Rate this question


OSC

Question

After seeing this report, http://www.va.gov/oig/pubs/VAOIG-12-00244-241a.pdf and the horrors within, a question came to mind.

When a file finally reaches the Rating or Decision section, do the raters pick and chose which file they are going to work on or do they just take the next one, no matter how big or what the contentions might be?

OSC

60 Nephropathy w/Hypertension

60 PN Upper Left

40 PN Lower Left

40 PN Lower Right

30 IHD

20 DMII

20 PAD Lower Left

20 PAD Lower Right

10 PN Upper Right

10 Scar L/R Carotid

10 Scar Abdomen

0 Hypertension

0 Surg Rt Ring Finger

100% P&T plus SMC (K-1)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I believe Harleyman can answer this better. I believe they basically need to follow the order but can do the easier ones first in the daily's schedule. Remember they get paid on product completed, not product completed properly. I believe that often thick files are rubber stamped, rather than really thoroughly read, using the assumption that the previous rater did it properly, thereby sending it to appeal hell and guarantying themselves more work. jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted Yesterday, 11:54 PM

After seeing this report, http://www.va.gov/oig/pubs/VAOIG-12-00244-241a.pdf and the horrors within, a question came to mind.

When a finally reaches the Rating or Decision section, do the raters pick and chose which file they are going to work on or do they just take the next one, no matter how big or what the contentions might be?

Some teams put all pending rating decision on a shelf and they are worked by DOC next oldest.

Some teams assign work to be complleted by "digit" assigment. For example, an RVSR will work all claims ready to rate ending in the digits 76 through 80. In this case the RVSR would decide which claim is worked next. (Be assured the work load management programs monitor if there is a claim that is being avoided.

Some teams have the coach assign the work and you come in everyday and your work is at /on your desk.

The Coach is reponsible to make sure the "stats" look good, As the management analyist reports to the VSCM and the Director if something or a team is failing to work older claims etc. Everyone like to have a variety of work during the month. We all like "quick easy" and we also like complex claims as the points assigned for credit for RVSR/VSR production standards are based on the number of issues in a claim, but also based on the issues correctly processed. A claim with 2 issues and you miss one means your are only 50% correct on that deicision. A claim if 4 issues and you miss one means you are 75% correct. The Corporate standards goal right now is 98% accuracy.

Lane assigments also make a difference on how fast a claim is processed. Lane assigments are based on type of claim and number of issues claimed. Obviously, less issues usually faster completion. More complex cases are handled by the Core team, two issues or less and FDC claims are handled by the Express teams. DMII, IU are handled by core due to the complexity by nature of the claim. Special Ops handles, homeless, FDC, MST,POW, Fast Track (phasing this program out). Non-rating EP team handles all non-rating issues that do not require and award, (there are some exceptions to this).

Hardship claims are handed by the team where the claimed issues would place it, however, these claims are hand carried to the next step in processing so the file doesn't get sent back to files by accident. Congressional are also handled based on the type of claim and how many issues. There is no special handling of the claim, other than the file is pulled and the Congressperson is sent an acknowlegement letter once the file is reviewed. The then file is sent back to the team for the standard processing, unless the review showed the claim should have been processed as a priority claim or something. Otherwise it is SOP as anyother claim.

There are what we within the VA call "HOT" claims, (not an official term). These are claims where the Secretary of VA or an assistant at Corporate or Area Offices, or the RO Director, or VSC Managers, has a direct interest in having the claim processed quickly and efficiently. These files are hand carried by the Coach to another Coach and tracked daily. These types of files do happen from time to time. It is usually a file where the Veteran's condition is termial or there are extreme family problems or they are trying to get the file to BVA quickly, things of that nature.

I would be more than happy to explain "lanes assigments" in more detail if people are interested. -

Edited by harleyman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phillip said: Remember they on product completed, not product completed properly. I believe that often thick files are rubber stamped, rather than really thoroughly read, using the assumption that the previous rater did it properly, thereby sending it to appeal hell and guarantying themselves more work. jmo

I wish this was so. It certainly would make things better. The VSRs and RVSRs are held accountable for thier work both for production and for quality. We have a Quality Review team that pulls random files throughout the month and they review the work for each claims assistant, VSR, RVSR, DRO. SO not only are they looking at the end result the rating and the awards they are also looking at did the claims asst set this claim up properly, did all issues get addressed, did the VSR get all the information in the file, did they request to much information, did the rater rate everything and was it correctly rated, did the VSR process the award correctly and was notification correct. We have the QR team always looking over our shoulder on any claim we touch and at anytime. We also have reveiws called "star" reviews conducted at the RO by the Corporate Office team reviewing the work of the RO in processing claims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your welcome- I will work on a post for you about the Lane assignments etc. But, I wanted to say, you all can see I am here during the daytime posting once in a while. I got to thinking, it might "look" like I am posting on this forum when I should be working claims. I want to let you know that is farthest from what is happening, and I do not post when I am at work. I always post on my private time/ leave time.

My spouse had surgery yesterday, and I am home taking care of the post-op stuff and driving due to medication issues. I have some time during the day to "play" on the computer so I've been visiting Hadit. Just for those who were wondering "what the heck is Harleyman doing on the cumputer".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks harleyman for the quick and very detailed response and NO I did not feel that you were playing on your computer during government work time.

Hope for a quick recovery for your wife.

Thanks again.

OSC

60 Nephropathy w/Hypertension

60 PN Upper Left

40 PN Lower Left

40 PN Lower Right

30 IHD

20 DMII

20 PAD Lower Left

20 PAD Lower Right

10 PN Upper Right

10 Scar L/R Carotid

10 Scar Abdomen

0 Hypertension

0 Surg Rt Ring Finger

100% P&T plus SMC (K-1)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use