Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Nod Or Wait And Start A New Claim?

Rate this question


Slowlane

Question

After you have been denied an increase in PTSD you have 3 options. 1. DRO hearing. 2. NOD. 3. Start a new claim.

For me, #1 DRO is too late (its been about 6 months). The choice between 2. NOD and 3. Start a new claim needs consideration.

If I file a NOD it make take 2 or 3 years to get a decision.

If I wait 6 months I can file a new claim and with all the emphasis that the RO's have on rapidly processing the claim I might get an earlier decision.

Am I overthinking this?

You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Lets see if I got this right.........I file a NOD before the one year limit and ask for a DRO hearing. At that point I will have more "new and material evidence". If the DRO denies then I go BVA.

You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Lets see if I got this right.........I file a NOD before the one year limit and ask for a DRO hearing. At that point I will have more "new and material evidence". If the DRO denies then I go BVA.

According to what, I interpret, Harleyman saying, is to file for an increase, with any new evidence you have, just prior to the one yr deadline and NOT filing a NOD. If it goes to the DRO, he/she probably won't look at the new evidence but will either return it for a new decision, due to the new evidence or affirm the previous decision, thereby causing the next appeal step to be the BVA (3-4 yrs). If they accept it as a claim for increase, they will probably order a new C&P (as the old C&P is a yr old) and any new records they may control and do a new decision, hopefully an increase w/a retro date. jmo

Also you could argue the claim for increase was a NOD, since it was filed within the one yr appeal deadline period, later if needed. Again jmo.

pr

Edited by Philip Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, I should have put quotation marks around slowlanes 30 day statement/question. His posts seem to indicate he is seperating the DRO and NOD into two different processes. My post was an attempt to indicate to him that the DRO is a process within the NOD/appeal system.

I hope I havent confused the issue further!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have done a DRO hearing before (on a different item) but it was a predetermination hearing that can only be arranged in the first 30 days of denial. Thats where I got confused about the first 30 days.

Harleyman saying to file for an increase........How do you do that to a active (less than one year old) denial without it being a NOD?

I think the best thing to do is entirely erase this thread and start over.

How does a normal veteran without computer skills even attempt to get compensation? AI got 3 Vietnam Vet buddies that wont go near the VA at gunpoint!

You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You simply write a letter, as I stated, requesting an increase, rather than stating "Please consider this a notice of disagreement (NOD) with your decision dated xx/xx/xxxx."

As for your friends, they can file online or write a letter to the Veterans Service Center, explaining what they are claiming. They will eventually have to go to the VA for a C&P exam or be denied for not showing up.

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks PR "simply write a letter" Will do.

Edited by Slowlane

You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use