Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Increased Disability Compensation If Retired

Rate this question


ut2seabee

Question

Am rated 50% at present time. 40% SC of this is for my hearing loss. Last hearing test of a month ago shows by the results that I meet VA requirments to be increased to 80%.

Question...new form 21-526EZ states..."we need medical or lay evindence to show a worsening or increase in severity and the effect that worsening or increase has on your ability to work."

As I retired from civilian work @age 62 and no longer work, are they likely to say that is hasn't affected my ability to work? I just dont trust the government. Their always trying to screw us out of something!

Any thoughts on this?

Ut2seabee

"REMEMBER....POLITICIANS AND DIAPERS SHOULD BE CHANGED OFTEN AND FOR THE SAME REASON"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

How long has it been since you worked? I don't think the VA can say well we think you can work. The evidence speaks for it self, if you should be rated at 80% for HL then so be it. I would also look at TDIU as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"we need medical or lay evindence to show a worsening or increase in severity and the effect that worsening or increase has on your ability to work."

Looks like it is asking for 2 things:

1. Medical or lay evidence of an increase in severity.

2. The effect that worsening or increase has on your ability to work.

The last hearing test would be medical evidence of an increase in severity.

I think you could write a statement about how the increase in severity affects your ability to get a job, do your job (if you had one), etc. A statement from a former co-worker could also be good, if you can get one.

"are they likely to say that is hasn't affected my ability to work?"

They are likely to say anything. But 4.85 - Evaluation of Hearing Impairment doesn't say anything about the ability to work having anything to do with the rating of hearing impairments. It seems pretty clear - and is based on the hearing test results.

So I don't think you would even have to show how it affects your ability to work to get the rating the hearing test shows you should have.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Am rated 50% at present time. 40% SC of this is for my hearing loss. Last hearing test of a month ago shows by the results that I meet VA requirments to be increased to 80%.

Question...new form 21-526EZ states..."we need medical or lay evindence to show a worsening or increase in severity and the effect that worsening or increase has on your ability to work."

As I retired from civilian work @age 62 and no longer work, are they likely to say that is hasn't affected my ability to work? I just dont trust the government. Their always trying to screw us out of something!

Any thoughts on this?

Ut2seabee

Since you're already rated for hearing loss, all you need to do is send a letter saying your condition has worsened, that you are requesting an increase and the VA has to schedule you for a C&P exam. It's pretty simple.

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use