Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Administrative Review?

Rate this question


infantry10

Question

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

From my understanding, once a decision has been made on your claim, a rating supervisor will automatically review your file to make sure that there are no errors in the decision. This happened on my claim, I was denied on 4/10, and on 4/30 it was opened under Administrative Review. My claim is currently "reopened" because I submitted new and material evidence while it was under Administrative Review. I'm sure someone else has more knowledge about it than I do.

Shyne-I

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my case they did a review on their own and found the error in my payment. It was supposed to start a month earlier then it did, so they corrected that. Funny thing is that I still didn't recieve any retro for it (13 months worth) or the other error that I am supposed to be getting SMC for the last 20 months. So it's some sort of quality check. But it obviously is not a catch all.

Take Care

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There were errors on mine made by VA which they openly admit to (surprising, I know). I've been in administrative review since Jan 22 but my pay cut started March 1st. It moved to prep for decision on May 18. I hope it doesn't take much longer but its not looking good as I cant even get a response from IRIS after 9 full business days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My contentions after 20 months closed Jul 31, 2013. They SC'd my IHD back to 2002 which was my 3rd

attempt to get re-SC'd after they took that away in 1978. The time frame from 2002 until oct. 2011

which was when I reopened this claim (again) they rated at 0%, then from oct 2011 to present rated at

50%. They opened the administrative review on the 2002-2011 time frame to gather more evidence

from getting my hospital records from that time period from the local military hospitals I use. They said there

was no evidence of disability to rate for those years but are looking through those hospital records to

see if there is any evidence of disability they can rate with some percentage. They did this on their own.

It really won't make much difference since I was medically retired with 13.5 yrs so my CRSC only starts in

2008. I need retro in the 70% range to gain any money out of it prior to 2008 because the offset of my

retirement will wipe it out. AT 70%, or higher, I have a shot at some small amount of difference..

It's Hell to get old...things hurt, things quit working, BUT, it sure beats the alternative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FYI- for everyone. We (at VA) have had a really difficult time getting older records from the VAMCs and from the military hospitals. In support of your claims I would suggest when possible you the Veteran, request and get any records you can get for yourself. If you can get copies in support of your claim from the military facility I would recommend you get those records make copies and then send in the copies of the records to VA, in support of your claim.

HONESTLY, it takes MONTHS & MONTHS for VA to get a response from the military medical facilities. WE are NOT allowed to move forward on a decision if we have a PENDING unanswered request for records from a Federal entity. VA RO's at the very least are required to receive a NEGATIVE response from the facility. This encludes all requests for records from Military, Social Security, VAMCs etc. These people IGNORE these requests for records EXPECIALLY if the records are older than 5 years, and they have to search their ARCHIVES. I would say this is the major HOLD up on the wait time for rating decisions. THAT and trying to get the NATIOAL GUARD RECORDS. We cannot move a claim forward for a decision unless we get the records, we must (MANDATORY) recieve a negative response that there are no records or the Veteran tells us NOT to go after the record. I know sometimes it is not possible, but when it is possible if you want to speed up your claim time for processing, go after those records yourself, copy and send inthe copies to the VA.

Edited by harleyman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmmm. I wish I knew what they were looking for in my case. I actually have those records. I got them about

2 months ago. I did pull a few pages and make copies that were from trips to the hospital I made with heart symptoms.

The records are not in any real order, except for the labs and ct/xray reports separated out. The rest, page to page

in the stack can bounce years in one direction or the other. I guess I could copy it all, or at least everything I assume

was after 2002. They are only interested in dates from 2002-2011. The problem is, that is over 3 reams of paper.

You think it would be worth boxing it up, taking it to the VARO in Houston who has my claim and letting them

copy what they want while I wait??? I could also get a copy of my C-file at the same time which I need anyway.

So I could almost justify the trip. Otherwise it would cost a small fortune just to copy everything and then mail it

to them. What do you think??? It is a 200 mile drive to go there.

It's Hell to get old...things hurt, things quit working, BUT, it sure beats the alternative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use