Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Cola Time Again

Rate this question


JR Reihs

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

It's that time of the year again......the official number would have already been out, but due to the congressional finger licking, the COLA numbers are forthcoming.

I am seeing from 1.3 to 1.5%......I know it ain't much, but it is a bird in hand.

Edited by JR Reihs

Do yourself a favor.....buy some gold and silver! The printing presses are in overdrive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

http://www.ssa.gov/cola/

"The purpose of the COLA is to ensure that the purchasing power of Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits is not eroded by inflation. It is based on the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) from the third quarter of the last year a COLA was determined to the third quarter of the current year.

The CPI-W is determined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in the Department of Labor. By law, it is the official measure used by the Social Security Administration to calculate COLAs."

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read an article on the internet this morning that said unknown because of what you said. However they stated 1.5% looked about right.

vet12

i did read an article sunday that said the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Federal flood insurance in my area is set to increase 1000% over the next few years. I don't think 1.5% increase in COLA will help much. If you live in a flood plain or near the water you probably know this. I live in Tampa Bay area and it is killing real estate sales in most expensive areas where people really want to live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that 1000% increase is twisted up into an analysis that the Flood insurance premiums wern't covering the insurance payouts. Would people really want to live in these places if they couldn't get insurance on their property? However, with the rates being jacked so high so fast, maybe a program should be put in place to offer a property swap, so that homeowners (not investors) could opt out of the area without losing a major asset. An asset that is often used to fund retirement for many people.

Edited by 71M10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

71M10

In S. Tampa where I live in a modest 64 year old house the neighborhoods that have stood for 75 years around the Tampa Bay will become suddenly unsellable and unaffordable for anyone with a mortgage. I was using this as an example of how inadequate a 1.5% COLA for anyone depending on a federal pension and SSA or a disabled vet. My SSA and 30 year federal pension is less than my VA compensation. I depend on COLA to stay somewhat current with cost of living. If I did not have investments built over 35 years I think my wife and I would be hurting one day. The federal pension is my disability pension since I have not worked in 12 years. When I was a postal worker I got COLA plus contractual raises and very cheap insurance. Because I worked double Sundays and had 40 hours of night pay I was making almost 50 grand in 2001. All I kept was my base pay plus COLA'S. This equals a crummy $1200 a month pension. I think I would need at least 5-6% cola a year just to keep up.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John, I understand your dilema. Just like the VA the Federal Flood Insurance Program is broken. Unfortunately, the proposed government fix will hurt individuals (not corporations). COLA already is so detached from the reality that retirees and regular people experience it is laughable(not considering health care costs and stripping out fuel) and the proposal to move to a chained CPI will just make it worse.

Keep on Keeping ON!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use