Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Interesting Statement On Stressors

Rate this question


free_spirit_etc

Question

http://www.va.gov/vetapp13/Files1/1309884.txt

"The Board notes that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) issued a decision in Menegassi v. Shinseki, 638 F.3d 1379 (Fed.Cir. 2011), in which it held that medical opinion evidence may be submitted for use in determining whether the occurrence of a stressor is corroborated. Id. at 1382. The Board notes that the discussion in the final rule notice issued in the Federal Register states that "a doctor's recitation of a veteran-patient's statements is no more probative than the veteran-patient's statements made to VA. Therefore, VA is not required to accept a doctor's diagnosis of PTSD due to a personal assault as proof that the stressor occurred or that the PTSD is service connected. If, however, VA finds that a doctor's diagnosis of PTSD due to a personal assault is ... "competent and credible" and there is no evidence to the contrary in the record, in all likelihood, such an opinion would constitute competent medical evidence." 67 Fed. Reg. 10330 -01 (Mar. 7, 2002). The Federal Circuit found that the regulation specifically designates - and VA's interpretation contemplates - that medical opinion evidence may be submitted to corroborate the in-service personal assault as the regulation lists records from mental health counseling centers, hospitals, or physicians. Menegassi, 638 F.3d at 1382."

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I have been diagnosed with depression,anxiety,cognitive disorder, and had a C&P for ptsd the examiner stated that i did not meet the full criteria for PTSD although i was seen in triage for multipal contusions and a laceration due to a well documented assault while in service and granted 100% by social security for the same mental conditions is this enough evidence for service connection the C&P stated these disorders as well as bipolar is this enough for service connection

leonard G Miller

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

so in laymans terms does what exactly does this mean will i have to have another MH exam to determine whether or not these disabilities was a product of the assault ior what im lost

leonard G Miller

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

http://www.va.gov/vetapp13/Files1/1309884.txt

"The Board notes that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) issued a decision in Menegassi v. Shinseki, 638 F.3d 1379 (Fed.Cir. 2011), in which it held that medical opinion evidence may be submitted for use in determining whether the occurrence of a stressor is corroborated. Id. at 1382. The Board notes that the discussion in the final rule notice issued in the Federal Register states that "a doctor's recitation of a veteran-patient's statements is no more probative than the veteran-patient's statements made to VA. Therefore, VA is not required to accept a doctor's diagnosis of PTSD due to a personal assault as proof that the stressor occurred or that the PTSD is service connected. If, however, VA finds that a doctor's diagnosis of PTSD due to a personal assault is ... "competent and credible" and there is no evidence to the contrary in the record, in all likelihood, such an opinion would constitute competent medical evidence." 67 Fed. Reg. 10330 -01 (Mar. 7, 2002). The Federal Circuit found that the regulation specifically designates - and VA's interpretation contemplates - that medical opinion evidence may be submitted to corroborate the in-service personal assault as the regulation lists records from mental health counseling centers, hospitals, or physicians. Menegassi, 638 F.3d at 1382."

so i was seen for an evaluation for ptsd the examiner stated i did not meet the full criteria for ptsd. my SMR's clearly show where i was seen in triage for a head injury where it was noted laceration to the head and contusions around both eye's this was an in service assault several years later i was attending college and failing badly i was sent to see an acidemic advisor who in turn sent me to see a psycologist he conducts a series of tests that reveald a cognitive disorder, axiety,depression,and personality disorder due to multipal head trauma and bipolar none of these run in our family nor were they present before the assault the examiner stated these were my mental disabilities is this in its self evidence for service connection or will they order another MH exam i am at the BVA now and have an attorney any thought's id like to hear thanks

leonard G Miller

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use