Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Mental Health Indoc Screening. And Other C&p Questions.

Rate this question


K9MAL

Question

I have several service connected disabilities that give me a lot of pain every day. I deal with migraines (30%), a busted up shoulder (30%) and a bum knee and ankle (both at 10%). I've noticed over time that this constant pain and dealing with it often leaves me in a bad mood and depressed, bummed out, for lack of a better term.

I called VA Mental Health and they said to come in next week for some type of indoc screening to see if I would be a candidate for therapy. I've never been to therapy or seen a mental health person so I'm pretty anxious and not sure what to expect.

Will there be testing? Just talking? I have no idea what to expect and am worried and stressed about the whole deal. Can anybody offer any direction or advice?

Thank you!

Edited by K9MAL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

You should tie your depression to your pain and medical condition every chance you get. If you file a claim for depression secondary to your medical conditions you need a psychiatrist to write a letter in IME style and say that your depression is secondary to your SC conditions. The VA won't put it together for you. You must present them with the whole predigested rational and DX and nexus. If it were me I would see the VA shrink for maybe 6 months to a year and keep pounding the connection between your pain and disability and your depression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

K9MAL--

You're halfway there by getting the diagnosis. Now you just need the nexus like John said. He gave some great advice there. I would do exactly what John said to do.

If you could get 50% or 70% for depression, would that be enough to get you to 100% combined rating? If you want to share your other percentages

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

You should tie your depression to your pain and medical condition every chance you get. If you file a claim for depression secondary to your medical conditions you need a psychiatrist to write a letter in IME style and say that your depression is secondary to your SC conditions. The VA won't put it together for you. You must present them with the whole predigested rational and DX and nexus. If it were me I would see the VA shrink for maybe 6 months to a year and keep pounding the connection between your pain and disability and your depression.

Great suggestions! Thank you. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

K9MAL--

You're halfway there by getting the diagnosis. Now you just need the nexus like John said. He gave some great advice there. I would do exactly what John said to do.

If you could get 50% or 70% for depression, would that be enough to get you to 100% combined rating? If you want to share your other percentages

I forgot to say thank you for thinking of me and bumping my thread, so thank you! :)

A *indicates ratings that haven't changed this go around. My ratings are as follows:

*Tension headaches with features of migraines 30%

*Right shoulder degenerative joint disease and bursitis 30%

*Right knee internal derangement 10%

*Right ankle injury, limitation of motion, pain and unstable 20% (bumped up from 10%)

Irritable bowel syndrome 30%

Impairment of rectal sphincter control 10%

Left knee patellofemoral pain syndrome 10%

Tinnitus 10%

Status post left distal phalanx fracture 0%

I don't know if it deserves a different thread since this is about depression but I definitely plan on appealing the impairment of control. My private gastro completed a DBQ indicating the 60% rating, using proper VA verbiage, and they only gave me 10%.

My right knee has had PFS, like the left, but they've never rated me for it and it is well documented in my service records. The C&P measurements weren't correct on my right knee. I'm not sure if the "internal derangement" takes care of the PFS or if they're are 2 different ratings that would apply.

The measurements at my C&P were off for my shoulder and it should now be 40% but I don't think I'll get it. There is documented arthritis in the shoulder as well but no mention of it by the raters.

I also think I can get the left foot bumped up from 0% after I get my MRI in a couple of months, maybe.

Sorry for the long winded post… I sincerely appreciate everyone's advice and recommendations. Hadit is an amazing resource for vets and their families!

Edited by K9MAL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

And I was also shot down for sleep disorder to include sleep apnea stating that:

"The evidence does not show an event, disease or injury in service. Your service treatment records do not contain complaints, treatment, or diagnosis for this condition."

However, at my separation physical I did complain of sleep problems, it is documented as such, yet they claim it's not there. I know the sleep apnea is hard to qualify for so long after service. Every girlfriend I had in the military and after, including my wife, had complained about my snoring, stopping breathing, etc.

I know this would be a lottery shot if I were to contest their decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use