Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What Is Best Way To Request Secondary Compensation

Rate this question


toddt

Question

Was granted 30% for scar as a result of surgery for adenocycstic carcinoma. Surgery was radical neck dissection - which left me with limited range of motion of my right arm (due to shoulder muscles being removed). Attempted to bring this up at my C&P exam but the doctor didn't do anything about it.

Can I request another C&P exam for limited motion? If so, how would that request be made? Or,

do I need to appeal via a NOD stating that the doctor should have tested me for range of motion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

You know your VA has the ability to write a perfect secondary condition opinion if they choose to do it. My PCP did if for me a few years ago when I wanted her to help me connect heart condition to DMII. Then VA changed their minds about helping vets do this, and I got a new PCP who was reluctant to stick her neck out for me. Since your claim is not final I don't think you have a CUE. The VA will not connect the dots for you even if it is obvious. That is why you get the private doctor to do it for you. This they will accept, sometimes. You get what you directly ask for from the VA. You have to know enough to ask, or they won't help you. This is my experience with all the conditions I have secondary to DMII. This is part of the learning curve at the VA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

that is ,a claimed residual......

we have to hold VA's hand on a lot of this stuff because they don't assume anything, if it could be favorable to us.

Also something triggered them to give you the scar C & P .... but no additional C & Ps...as far as I can tell.

For example a vet could have claimed DMII and then have obvious secondaries to DMII, like renal disease, candidiasis, IHD,but if the Vet didn't claim them, the C & P doc isnt obligated (or even the Raters) to address them for possible ratings.

And they would all require a C & P opinion as to the medical link to the DMII anyhow.

John is right on these points he makes and ,as a hardcore claimant myself, I learned that VA definitely cant connect the dots and it often takes an IMO/IME doc to do that.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Berta, I only claimed cancer, did not claim scars or anything else related to the cancer. I did have "boots on the ground" and asked that this be associated with AO, which they denied. I did get IHD AO presumed. I also got hearing loss and tinnitus. So, should this be a NOD? and if so should I elaborate on my range of motion, fatigue and pain when attempting to raise my arm above shoulder height?

On Wednesday I have an appointment at the VA in order to met with a PCP for the first time. I was thinking about taking VA Form 21-0960M-12 (http://www.vba.va.gov/pubs/forms/VBA-21-0960M-12-ARE.pdf) "Shoulder and Arm Conditions Disability Benefits Questionnaire" and having him fill it out.

Also, thought that this might fall under "Duty to Assist" because I would have thought the VA would have figured out that a radical neck dissection would have had other consequences besides just scars.

Edited by toddt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

You're right, Berta and John. It's a gaping hole of a disability in my opinion and is so obvious that the Toddt may have a legitimate concern that it should have been picked up by a C&P or another VA exam and then compensated. But without someone connecting the dots...and we all know where that goes!

What do you think about Toddt taking a DBQ to a first appointment and asking for help, though, especially from a VA PCP? John, you've had trouble getting assistance from them and others have said as much.

Toddt, do you have an outside doctor who's working with you on your health concerns? If so, and you have an established working relationship with that doctor and can get that doctor's assistance, that's who I'd feel most comfortable approaching if it were me, even if it cost me money out of pocket. You can certainly take any and all diagnoses and records from your outside doctors to your VA primary care doc for their medical files...which may help you in the long run. But if you don't have a doc on the outside, even in the past, whom you can approach, you really don't have any choice but to approach the doctors you have now. As John points out, VA docs are not always the most cooperative with disability issues.

Edited by TiredCoastie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

TiredCoastie, unfortunately my outside PCP who I had been seeing for close to 20 years was killed in an automobile accident. I will try the DBQ with the VA PCP if that doesn't work and I appeal shouldn't the VA schedule me for a C&P exam to ascertain my claims?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

“Berta, I only claimed cancer, did not claim scars or anything else related to the cancer “

In that case I am quite surprised they gave you the scar C & P exam.

“Also, thought that this might fall under "Duty to Assist" because I would have thought the VA would have figured out that a radical neck dissection would have had other consequences besides just scars. “

I personally think the term Duty to Assist should be expanded to state instead....'you, the claimant ,have the duty to assist yourself ,by being as proactive as possible,in seeking all of the evidence you need for a proper decision.'

If I waited for VA to 'assist' me, all of my claims would be in the crapper by now.

You do have an good handle on all this, and seem willing to consider the excellent advice here, but dealing with the VA is not like dealing with any other federal entity. I call it VA 101 sometimes because it involves getting a real education that many of us never dreamed we would need to learn.

"So, should this be a NOD?"

A Nod , as the first avenue of attack on a faulty decision is also like a CUE claim in this way.....

(I call it the Watergate question)

What did VA know and when did they know it?

In you case they knew you claimed certain disabilities, and they knew the evidence was there for the cancer and the scar.

Are you able to scan and attach their decision here? Cover your name,address and C file # before you scan it.

I think you might have to file a new claim for the residuals. The decision will tell us more.

A NOD is a formal disagreement with their decision.

They cannot make a decision on what was not claimed.

They cannot deny what was not claimed.

And they really cannot commit a CUE (a legal error) on anything that was not claimed.

And secondaries need a medical opinion as to the secondary nature, no matter how obvious it might be,

so that VA can not only justify any comp they award for a secondary, (because the raters cant make medical decisions)

but also because a medical opinion is what they need to rate the secondary properly.

We could help more if we can read their decision.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use