Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Cancer & Ao Claims

Rate this question


Cavman

Question

As some of you know I was denied on my AO claim for stage 4 tonsil cancer. My U of Mi doctor`s letter states it should be on the covered cancer list being the dioxin had to pass thru the tonsils and throat to get to the lungs etc.

Us tonsil cancer guys sprayed in Nam are getting to be a large group from what I`m seeing. Are there any guys or gals here that have been diagnosed with it?

I think our only chance to be recognized by the V.A. is to get it on the list. I`m working on my state senator here. One problem we have is many of us don`t have alot of time to get it done. In my case I have a 30% chance of surviving 5 years being a stage 4, thats if I can survive the difficult first 2 years without it coming back. By the way, I go tuesday to get a lung checked showing a nodule. Wish this old crazy vet luck. Kidding, hell I`ll be fine.

Thanks for the attention....really.

Cavman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Cavman,

I hope that my story can bring some encouragement to you.

I went for an innocent Scan of my chest.

Test came back check for soft tissue of left lung, lesion to left kidney and cyst to left upper lobe of liver.

I went into the PET Cancer Test.

Lungs were clear, only and old scar. Kideys were followed up with a dye kidney scan and they were fine and so was the liver.

The glucose tracer did go to my right thyroid and to a suspicious area to colon.

I am betting that your lung will be just fine as mine.

My prayers are with you and trust that you will pray for me as I have my thyroid test for cancer on Tuesday.

Always,

Josephine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cavman,

I hope that my story can bring some encouragement to you.

I went for an innocent Scan of my chest.

Test came back check for soft tissue of left lung, lesion to left kidney and cyst to left upper lobe of liver.

I went into the PET Cancer Test.

Lungs were clear, only and old scar. Kideys were followed up with a dye kidney scan and they were fine and so was the liver.

The glucose tracer did go to my right thyroid and to a suspicious area to colon.

I am betting that your lung will be just fine as mine.

My prayers are with you and trust that you will pray for me as I have my thyroid test for cancer on Tuesday.

Always,

Josephine

I sure will Josephine and thank you dearly for the kindness.

Cavman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Cavman,

Being that it will be Tuesday for us both, as I go into the machine, I will say a prayer for you and myself, that we will both be fine.

I pray that we can both post a fantastic report when all the test come in.

Be strong, as you have a lot of wonderful supporters on this site.

God Bless,

Josephine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Cavman

Goodluck on this thing. You know Hadit is mostly about claims, but lives are more important than claims. I don't see how you can get lung cancer without AO passing through the throat and tonsils. This is just one of the many flaws in these AO studies that make no rational sense. The VA will argue that a cancer on the AO list started in another body part so it is not covered. This thing is about the government protecting itself from liability. Ranch Hand was started to find a way to protect chemical makers from liability. The smoke screen was that they were trying to help veterans. Ranch Hand did show a significant relationship between DMII and AO. This is going to cost the VA and ultimately the taxpayers billions and billions of dollars. This is why the VA is digging in their heels on the blue water navy AO vets. This thing is about politics and money and not about medicene. If the VA and Congress had the capacity for shame they would be hanging their heads for what they have done to RVN vets, test vets and the vets exposed in the Gulf. Instead they are looking for loopholes to not pay.

Keep fighting for your health and claim, Cavman, and we wish you well.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cavman

Goodluck on this thing. You know Hadit is mostly about claims, but lives are more important than claims. I don't see how you can get lung cancer without AO passing through the throat and tonsils. This is just one of the many flaws in these AO studies that make no rational sense. The VA will argue that a cancer on the AO list started in another body part so it is not covered. This thing is about the government protecting itself from liability. Ranch Hand was started to find a way to protect chemical makers from liability. The smoke screen was that they were trying to help veterans. Ranch Hand did show a significant relationship between DMII and AO. This is going to cost the VA and ultimately the taxpayers billions and billions of dollars. This is why the VA is digging in their heels on the blue water navy AO vets. This thing is about politics and money and not about medicene. If the VA and Congress had the capacity for shame they would be hanging their heads for what they have done to RVN vets, test vets and the vets exposed in the Gulf. Instead they are looking for loopholes to not pay.

Keep fighting for your health and claim, Cavman, and we wish you well.

John

All I want to do is get college for my daughter while I still can. Thank you so much for your words. They help.

Cavman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use